Terminus not putting cards into the graveyard can also be relevant. A couple things that come to mind right away are Dredge and Sam Black Zombies.
I'd rather play Supreme Verdict against some decks, including Goblins and Maverick. Goblins can get a Goblin Matron and get their Goblin Ringleader back, this allowing them to 'retieve' those dead goblins. Same thing goes with Maverick, except they run Green sun's Zenith instead.
Decks like RUG, BUG and UW aggro control can generally be dealt with by 1:1ing threats. Often times a wrath might just be a 1:1 for 4 mana against them, that seems awful. Also, it assumes that you can get to 4 (including WW) mana through wastelands/stifles in time.
How long has it been since we have had to deal with Madness? Hasn't that deck pretty much been dead since Goyf was printed?
SnT decks are also probably just faster than a 4 mana wrath can come down. You might kill GB no matter how many cards they draw, but they are probably going to have 9-16 cards in hand to jam another one into play. Terminus + top also answers Emrakul at instant speed if he is Sneak attacked into play, or "hard cast" off Omniscience.
Entreat the Angels seems like the best argument for it to me, outside of Merfolk, but unless you only plan on playing against Miracles, I think Terminus outshines this card in the general metagame.
I guess it was untrue to say that you do not need to deal with counters, but I do think that the card is pretty bad compared to Terminus in most match ups. 4 mana is just too expensive against most decks, and the uncounterable clause doesn't seem like it would come up that frequently.
[Edit]
To say that you would use it against Goblins/Mav assumes that you will get to the 4 mana through wastelands. The fact that the goblins shuffle back in only matters if it was a 1 of. But you have probably just generated a huge ammount of card advantage so even if they do go find it again, you can always just answer it 1:1 with a swords or something. resolving a wrath against a deck like goblins probably just 4+:1ed them.
Or perhaps the banning of Survival of the Fittest.Originally Posted by that0neguy
I think it comes down to what your meta is comprised of. If there are a lot of tempo decks, especially ones that play Stifle then Supreme Verdict might edge out Terminus. Otherwise Terminus is likely better.
Saying four mana is too much, is outlandish. This is a deck that can operate of basics and generally leave fetchlands unused until a Stifle-happy opponent is tapped out. We also play Jace, the Mind Sculptor and an assortment of other cards at four (usually out of the board). Hell sometimes it is right to hardcast a Batterskull at five. So while I see where your logic is coming from in that you don't want to pay four for a sweeper, it is still is likely better in some scenarios than a Terminus. I think it warrants testing. I can see it as a maindeck and/or a sideboard card pending deck distribution in a given meta.
Legacy
Grixis Delver
Vintage
Mono Mentor
Team Leovold
There are 2 problems.
Even if you are up against stifle, you assume that they overextend into it. If the tempo player just plays 1 delver/goose/goyf at a time, 4 mana removal spells seem terrible.
Then you assume that you can get to 4 mana in a relavent time frame against wasteland (and possibly even stifle.)
It seems really mediocre against tempo to me.
I feel like there's better things to be doing than wrathing a RUG player. I'm perfectly happy 1-for-1ing them and occasionally catching them with an EE. Terminus is fine here, but I still think it's unnecessary and I'd rather have EE.
Sure there's the random Bant deck, but Merfolk is the main MU I can think of where being uncounterable is actually very relevant. Wrath effects are great here and being able to run it into a Daze, Cursecatcher, or Spell Pierce is really powerful.
There are a couple times though when the cannot regen is relevant, Thrun and Ezuri. Thrun is sometimes a SB card for Maverick, already a tough MU. Elves is generally MDing some number of Ezuri.
Between Wrath of God and Supreme Verdict, I think it depends whether you want to hedge against Elves or Merfolk.
(I'm somewhat undecided about where I stand with Terminus. We are a slow enough deck that RUG and GSZ decks like Maverick can probably recover to some degree.)
I've been playing EsperBlade for a few months with good success at my local store. It's been fun and offers great angles of attack against most everything. I'm looking to take the deck to SCG LA this weekend, and I wanted to get a few opinions. Here's what I'm running
4 Stoneforge Mystic
4 Snapcaster Mage
1 Clique
2 Engineered Explosives
1 Batterskull
1 Jitte
4 Brainstorm
3 Spell Pierce
1 Counterspell
4 Force of Will
4 Swords to Plowshares
2 Ponder
3 Inquisition of Kozilek
1 Duress (plan to swap for thoughtseize)
1 Lingering Souls
2 Jace, TMS
2 Island
2 Plains
1 Swamp
4 Polluted Delta
4 Flooded Strand
3 Underground Sea
2 Tundra
1 Scrubland
1 Academy Ruins
1 Glacial Fortress
1 Karakas
SB
2 Lingering Souls
2 Flusterstorm
2 Disenchant
1 Spell Pierce
1 Perish
1 Wrath of God
1 Sword of Feast and Famine
1 Darkblast
1 Jace, TMS
3 Surgical Extraction
I had 3 lingering souls main for a while, but cut them for extra countermagic, and Jitte has been obviously weaker.
In anticipation of a combo heavy SCG La metagame, I wanted to make the following changes.
-1 Lingering Souls
-1 Snapcaster Mage
-1 Jitte (move to SB)
+1 Sword of Feast and Famine
+2 Geist of Saint Traft
-1 Spell Pierce (will replace 1 disenchant in SB)
-1 Glacial Fortress
-1 Plains
+3 Wasteland
Against the various Sneak and Show/OmniShow decks, I sometimes have trouble closing out the game. Geist seems like a good clock. I like Jitte better in the main, but without soul tokens, it's more difficult to get Jitte counters, hence SoFaF. I'm concerned that these changes will leave me a little too soft against RUG delver and Maverick. What do you think?
I'm less sure about the wasteland addition. A 1 of Dustbowl seems more conventional, but I wanted to try wasteland because it's faster and increases the lifespan of Spell Pierce against decks which rely heavily on City of Traitors and Ancient Tomb. Furthermore, I'm more comfortable with 23 lands. Thoughts?
Finally, I've been unimpressed with Ponder. I usually don't have mana to cast it during the early turns (SFM, Discard, Spell Pierce, and Brainstorm take precedence). I see it as more of a mid to late game play useful for digging for a threat. I fully admit that I could be playing it wrong. What do you think of 2x Baleful Strix in the ponder slots?
The strix pitches to Force, blocks profitably, and digs (admittedly worst than ponder). It might be too durdley, but it seems good as an infiniblocker when combined with Ruins.
Thanks in advance for your consideration.
I like the idea of Baleful Strix, especially with Academy Ruins and Restoration Angel. Might be worth testing.
Finally someone who sees the potential!
List I have been brewing for local meta that has a bit of everything but storm combo.
Main:
1 Academy Ruins
4 Flooded Strand
2 Island
1 Karakas
1 Marsh Flats
1 Plains
1 Swamp
4 Polluted Delta
4 Tundra
3 Underground Sea
4 Brainstorm
2 Counterspell
4 Force of Will
3 Inquisition of Kozilek
4 Swords to Plowshares
2 Lingering Souls
3 Spell Pierce
2 Engineered Explosives
2 Jace, the Mind Sculptor
1 Umezawa's Jitte
4 Stoneforge Mystic
2 Vendilion Clique
1 Batterskull
4 Snapcaster Mage
Side:
3 Surgical Extractions
1 Spell Pierce
1 Sword of Feast and Famine
2 Disenchant
3 Relic of Progenitus
1 Lingering Souls
3 Oblivion Rings
1 Engineered Explosives
What have been people's thoughts on Dust Bowl? On paper it definitely seems like where we want to be... good for long grinds and requires less space than Wastelands. I'm still hesitant though. Sometimes LD is needed now and that's where I really miss Wasteland.
I'm working on a new list.. thinking about 2 wastelands and 1 dust bowl. I rly dont wanna lose a game cuz I cant destroy a single maze in time =s
Dust Bowl does a fine job for me. With esper I find the Mana denial route is game we don't want to play. We can ALWAYS find something to do with our Mana. Stoneblade is much weaker when it misses a land drop and we want to reach 5 Mana. It doesn't make sense to remove lands for wastelands.
I can understand using a wasteland in place of ponder.
I think uw with wastelands could work.
If we can't beat the maze, then we chump block with our germ, gain life and go to the Jace strategy.
That seems like a whole lot of slots you're putting into colorless lands. I'm more worried about getting Wastelanded myself than being able to destroy Mazes. That said, I still think it's important to have at least 1-2 ways to stop Maze.
Do none of you guys think Volrath's Stronghold makes the cut? I find it really makes my opponent's think twice about attacking into a Snapcaster Mage.
If I was looking for all the value, I'd go for Riptide over Stronghold. I'm trying to minimize colorless lands though.
At the moment I play Academy Ruins as my Utility-Land of choice. Twice. Cause I play 2 EE Mainboard and 1-2 more in the Sideboard. Cant see me playing any Utility-Lands besides Ruins+Karakas though...
Greetings
let's talk splash colors for the sb.
black for discard effects or red for REB?
i've been RED for months, but i want to try something new. does anyone have an argument for sb discard?
I don't know about SB discard but MD discard is awesome, MD Thought Seize with SB Spell Pierce is my go to combination and I think the SB options in black are better than the SB options in red, namely Perish. Unless you're playing MD Lightning Bolts or Grim Lavamancers I don't think REB is worth splashing for, with Flusterstorm as an option, you need more out of your splash than another situational counterspell.
Have you guys seen Detention Sphere yet? I think it may replace our Engineered Explosives, it's way more cost efficient vs. Tarmogoyf and Counterbalance fwiw ... and pitches to FoW!
EE > Sphere because it hits Mongeese.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
