Page 122 of 376 FirstFirst ... 2272112118119120121122123124125126132172222 ... LastLast
Results 2,421 to 2,440 of 7512

Thread: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBx Explorer Zenith Control)

  1. #2421
    Aes Sídhe
    Arianrhod's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2010
    Location

    Williamsport, PA.
    Posts

    397

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Quote Originally Posted by Qweerios View Post
    Wait what? Rector allows the enchanting of Hexproof creatures? I understand how you can get an aura on Emrakul (because hes not Hexproof/Shroud), but I have never heard of enchanting a Mongoose before.

    My guess is that as the aura enters the battlefield, it is targeting as a permanent, therefore it isn't a spell or an ability anymore. Shroud effects only grant protection from spells and abilities.
    Quote Originally Posted by fireiced View Post
    I think it works the same way how Zur can "enchant" himself with auras even with him enchanted with shroud like Diplomatic Immunity with his triggered ability
    ^

    The enchantment comes into play already attached to something. It doesn't target, therefore shroud has no effect on it.

    Why is everyone cutting Primeval Titan from Scapewish, exactly? I could see going 1/1 split with Grave, but Primeval's way too good to cut. I've won a lot of games just on his back alone -- either because he sticks around and literally wins on his own, or just because he fetches up both Valakuts when he resolves and then you proceed to derp all over their face.

  2. #2422

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Quote Originally Posted by Arianrhod View Post
    ^
    Why is everyone cutting Primeval Titan from Scapewish, exactly? I could see going 1/1 split with Grave, but Primeval's way too good to cut. I've won a lot of games just on his back alone -- either because he sticks around and literally wins on his own, or just because he fetches up both Valakuts when he resolves and then you proceed to derp all over their face.
    Why would you run gravetitan in scapewish at all? Isn't the gameplan to have valakut in play and then bash with mountains? I also cannot see why you would run a non-GSZ target which on itself is fragile to pernicious deed due to tokens over a wincon GSZ target that also helps filter for topdecks as quite a few already stated that it can come to bothplayers in topdeck mode..

    What does the Grave titan do which makes it so highly liked at all?
    Scapewishers respond !!

    I would rather play scapewish, and if its not enough use loaming shaman to recycle your lands to do it over and over again

    Sylvan Savekeeper can put your lands in the graveyard if you need to as well, nice for primefall titan and protects your creatures
    Loaming Shaman is good for graveyard hate and works nice with primefall and scapewish
    Primefall titan is good for scapewish and gives a clock
    Primefall titan is bad versus submerge, wooptiedoo


    synergy for the win.. at least thats my take on the deck..
    DECK:Combo Control - BUG w EXP

  3. #2423

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Quote Originally Posted by Cire_dk View Post
    Well done, gratz

    I know you encountered a specific meta but in general would you prefer your bonfires to Pulse?

    How did 2 Gravetitans work for you, would you keep them in this list?
    My meta is INFESTED, I repeat INFESTED with merfolk and their islands all over the bloody place! besides gobos, zoo and maverick all are gunned down by the bonfire!

    Grave boy is really a meta call, the 2 zombies do A LOT of work against u/w miracles by chipping at their life low enough for me to slow roll valakuts against them. People might say primeval does the trick easily but it seems after getting jace bounced, my primeval gets countered NONSTOP as they already have prepared Terminus on top with counterbalance or just plain top decked a counterspell or force.

    Quote Originally Posted by Arianrhod View Post

    Why is everyone cutting Primeval Titan from Scapewish, exactly? I could see going 1/1 split with Grave, but Primeval's way too good to cut. I've won a lot of games just on his back alone -- either because he sticks around and literally wins on his own, or just because he fetches up both Valakuts when he resolves and then you proceed to derp all over their face.
    O Arianrhod! As I said I have very weird interactions with my decks, apparently I always draw valakuts against every testing game and game in the small tourny against u/w miracles. Besides it was a suggestion by my mate running u/w miracles so I figured I try it out!

    Quote Originally Posted by KMS View Post
    Why would you run gravetitan in scapewish at all? Isn't the gameplan to have valakut in play and then bash with mountains? I also cannot see why you would run a non-GSZ target which on itself is fragile to pernicious deed due to tokens over a wincon GSZ target that also helps filter for topdecks as quite a few already stated that it can come to bothplayers in topdeck mode..

    What does the Grave titan do which makes it so highly liked at all?
    Scapewishers respond !!

    I would rather play scapewish, and if its not enough use loaming shaman to recycle your lands to do it over and over again
    No I myself do not like grave titan over primeval as primeval makes the game end so much faster just by digging mountains in to play after the initial 2 valakuts. By the way @KMS I really love your idea on boseiju to make sure my spells get forced through. Maybe 1 Crop Rotation to grab this bad boy in play? Really need to see Arianrhod's opinion as I basically modified by deck from his

    Besides deed in the u/w matchup is really to fight against those annoying End of my Turn Entreats, GSZ for Huntermaster and roll this 1 man wolf army will threaten leathal against any deck I play against, Grave Titan is just to come down to seal the deal after they deal with Huntmaster.

    That said, I still find Grave Titan extremely clunky, but they just proved their worth in that 1 win I had against u/w miracles with said zombie tokens chipping down an active jace, 4 life off the opponent and let me stay in game by chumping taigos and mishra factories as I tried to draw the last mountain to finish him off

  4. #2424

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Quote Originally Posted by Osmin View Post
    Share the knowledge with others!
    I usually side 1-2 explorers, 1-2 wood elves and 1 flex for 3 REB and 2 extirpates

    actually that is about it, can't really side a lot with a wish board

    Note: I never side out therapies, I JUST LOVE THIS CARD! [although Arianrhod suggested taking out 1-2]

  5. #2425

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    More fuel for GBR Nic Fits, perhaps? 8cc is scary high, but it has a Grave Titan-esque ability and crazy synergy with Broodmate Dragon to end almost any game the next turn.

    Dragon Fit?

    Utvara Hellkite 6RR
    Creature - Dragon (M)
    Flying
    Whenever a dragon you control attacks, put a 6/6 red dragon creature token with flying onto the battlefield.
    6/6
    Last edited by Claymore; 09-18-2012 at 11:36 AM. Reason: I need more adjectives

  6. #2426
    Aes Sídhe
    Arianrhod's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2010
    Location

    Williamsport, PA.
    Posts

    397

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    I've contemplated trying to build a Jund-color Dragon Fit list a few times -- we have the mana production to actually use Sarkhan the Mad, and with Top, we could have a functional Bob that doesn't actually kill us. Load up on like Broodmate, Thundermaw, and other assorted playable dragons, and go to town. I've never actually built it other than just assembled synergies in my head, though, and I'm fairly sure that 8 mana is just too damn much. If such a list were to exist, if it wanted an 8-drop, it would surely be Hellkite Overlord, not that thing.

  7. #2427
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    I do love me some hellkite overlord! *That dude is so sweet... Sadly it just isn't good. *Sarkhan Vol seems kinda sweet to... Putting him down tell Non cast emrakuls to eat one. *

    I've been thinking of dropping punishing fires... It weakens my mana base to wasteland and it makes for some Grindy games. *May go back to GB once RTR comes out. *

    Edit: with rector and fetters, it's the same reason in standard that solar flare was playing dead weight and pacifism. You can use Sun Titans recursion ability to bring back enchantments and hit Thrun and Geist of Saint Traft.
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    I've been taking shitty brews and tier 2 decks to tournaments and losing with them for years now. Welcome to the club. We meet for cocktails after round 6.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevestamopz View Post
    Top quality german restraint there.

    If I'm at the point where I'm rage quitting, you can bet your kransky that I'm calling everyone involved a cunt.

  8. #2428

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Too bad Dragonspeaker Shaman is so fragile or Dragon-Nic-Fit could be okay. But that new Dragon? I'd rather run Bogardan Hellkite, but Inferno Titan is leagues better than either Hellkite.

  9. #2429
    Member
    Ayotte's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Location

    Madison, WI
    Posts

    39

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    So I've been lurking this thread for a while now and trying different variations of the deck on Cockatrice. It is a lot of fun, but I'd say my biggest issue right now is my mulligan decisions. I've had way too many games where I either didn't mulligan enough and couldn't play + sac an Explorer, and also way too many games where I remembered those other games and mulliganed too much just trying to find an Explorer. This experience will come with time, though.

    I'd like to purchase the deck as my first entrance into actually owning legacy cards. For this reason, I think the best option is to start with straight GB and then once that's complete I can work on a white or blue splash. Here is the list I just drew up at work for what I might buy. Please tell me what is wrong with it before I spend money on cards I shouldn't want. I don't know what metagame I'm up against, since I haven't actually competed at my LGS's legacy tournaments yet.

    Creatures (13)
    4 Veteran Explorer
    2 Eternal Witness
    2 Sakura-Tribe Elder
    1 Thragtusk
    1 Grave Titan
    1 Thrun, the Last Troll
    1 Wickerbough Elder
    1 Scavenging Ooze

    Artifacts (3)
    3 Sensei's Divining Top

    Enchantments (4)
    3 Pernicious Deed
    1 Phyrexian Arena

    Planeswalkers (3)
    2 Liliana of the Veil
    1 Garruk Primal Hunter

    Sorceries & Instants (15)
    3 Maelstrom Pulse
    4 Cabal Therapy
    2 Thoughtseize
    2 Innocent Blood
    4 Green Sun's Zenith

    Lands (22)
    4 Bayou
    4 Verdant Catacombs
    1 Misty Rainforest
    1 Polluted Delta
    2 Phyrexian Tower
    4 Forest
    5 Swamp
    1 Volrath's Stronghold

    The sideboard will come later. Thanks!

  10. #2430
    Member
    Qweerios's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2010
    Location

    Montreal
    Posts

    1,024

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    @Ayotte,

    -Leave Sakura out of a 2colored list;
    -Don't buy 2 Phyrexian Towers yet, you might not need the second;
    -Don't buy Pulses yet, Decay might just replace it;
    -Don't play any non-forest Fetches;
    -Play an even number of Forests and Swamps, or;
    -Play more Forests than Swamps.

    I would also suggest Primeval Titan and 2 Treetop Village instead of Grave Titan. Since a Titan is your singleton bomb, make it GSZ-friendly and dont be afraid about the stability of your manabase in GB, it is very resilient as it is. Thoughtseize is a card I would never recommend to a newcomer in Legacy because it is stupid expensive and not that much better than Inquisition of Kozilek or Duress. As for IB, it will probably be replaced by Decay/Liliana altogether, but its not expensive, so go ahead and buy 12 playsets...
    Do you know what assuming does? It makes an ass out of you and me.
    Get it...? Ass, u, me?

    ... ffs I was trying to be funny...

  11. #2431
    Member
    Ayotte's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Location

    Madison, WI
    Posts

    39

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Quote Originally Posted by Qweerios View Post
    @Ayotte,

    -Leave Sakura out of a 2colored list;
    Okay.
    -Don't buy 2 Phyrexian Towers yet, you might not need the second;
    Okay
    -Don't buy Pulses yet, Decay might just replace it;
    I was listing pulses because I thought the main purpose of them was to deal with planeswalkers, which is an important issue for this deck. I already own one pulse.
    -Don't play any non-forest Fetches;
    Should I have more green fetches? I only own the fetches I have listed, which is why they're the ones I listed.
    -Play an even number of Forests and Swamps, or;
    -Play more Forests than Swamps.
    Oh, yeah, I meant to do that. Thanks.

    I would also suggest Primeval Titan and 2 Treetop Village instead of Grave Titan. Since a Titan is your singleton bomb, make it GSZ-friendly and dont be afraid about the stability of your manabase in GB, it is very resilient as it is. Thoughtseize is a card I would never recommend to a newcomer in Legacy because it is stupid expensive and not that much better than Inquisition of Kozilek or Duress. As for IB, it will probably be replaced by Decay/Liliana altogether, but its not expensive, so go ahead and buy 12 playsets...

    I was considering the primeval and treetop. Thanks for the advice there. I already own 4 thoughtseizes. I also really like Innocent Blood as a card, and I was assuming that I would want some cheap removal that's not pulse or deed. I also wanted to make sure to have a way to bin explorer, since not having a sacrifice effect has lost me a few games in the past couple weeks.
    Thanks for the advice. What should I use instead of the elders?

  12. #2432

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    testing this:

    1 Sylvan safekeeper
    1 scapeshift
    1 terrafore as sweet gsz target, should grow fast with protection from safekeeper
    1 primefall titan
    4 veteran explorer
    1 loaming shaman
    1/2 phantasmal image
    perhaps a random knight of the reliquary though i rather have trample then searching lands

    just played picelli, and he kicked my butt. game one i had a few misplays leaving an open board at 2 hp which should not happen.. if I get excited im at my worse

    game 2 extirpate on therapy and got killed by ooze/lilliana
    im ok with the setup though it needs quite some refinement..
    I played surgical extraction MB to test as well rather had brainstorm for sure

    What actually killed me is two games graveyard dependant.. (extirpate+ooze, with liliana's +1 is not what you want to face) should go for more agro style game 2
    overall im happy with the results, and i should have won game1 period
    Had leviathan in play and therapy's in the gy, could have called but forgot, then out tapping myself and threapy with the wrong guy for recurring nightmare intoleviathan again.. so stupid should not have happenend
    DECK:Combo Control - BUG w EXP

  13. #2433

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Sakura isn't there to mana fix, its there to accelerate. You just saw his problem of mulling into oblivion of not having Explorers, and taking out the backup doesn't help.

    Likewise, taking out Towers and Bloods when he admits having problems losing games to not having a sac outlet is also bad.

    Decay doesn't strictly replace Pulse, but a 1+/1+ split might work too.

    I'd say those fetches are okay. The only single problem one is Polluted Delta, but for starting out it shouldn't be all that bad. The most important part of the forest fetch is to give you better chance at throwing down Explorers, and Delta gets Bayou gets Explorer. You run the risk of Bayou getting wasted, but fuck it, that specific scenario won't be all that common here. Maybe switch it out later, but don't feel like its going ro ruin your whole deck.

    Play test and buy whichever list makes you happy, but make sure you test such changes. Like taking out Grave Titan and putting in Treetops, which fuck over your mana base.
    Last edited by Claymore; 09-18-2012 at 02:11 PM. Reason: fhj

  14. #2434

  15. #2435
    Play Deed. Nuke the World.
    EpicLevelCommoner's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2010
    Posts

    321

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Quote Originally Posted by KMS View Post
    And to awnser a previous question(I think iona because that can keep you for casting your solution) though its not as devastating if you dont have a direct awnser, then emraku is pretty bad.. it should not attack.
    Anyways I dont think they are that terrible at all, they give allot of stress and you SHOULD have awnsers mainboard for those matchups
    That's the problem I'm having: there's just so much viable, yet situational removal available for this deck. Off the top of my head, we have Edicts, Decay, Damnation, Pulse, Deed, Grip, etc. It's becoming a pita to prepare a removal suite that is consistent in both utility and frequency.

    Or is this archetype just that metagame sensitive?

  16. #2436
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Italy, Eternal
    Posts

    1,848

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    No Deathrite Shaman? As a 3-of i can't see it as bad in this deck. Pretty nice synergy with liliana too. I wouldn't play more than 3 as multiple of it aren't as good when u run a rock-like deck like nice-fit.

  17. #2437
    Aes Sídhe
    Arianrhod's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2010
    Location

    Williamsport, PA.
    Posts

    397

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Quote Originally Posted by Claymore View Post
    Sakura isn't there to mana fix, its there to accelerate. You just saw his problem of mulling into oblivion of not having Explorers, and taking out the backup doesn't help.

    Likewise, taking out Towers and Bloods when he admits having problems losing games to not having a sac outlet is also bad.

    Decay doesn't strictly replace Pulse, but a 1+/1+ split might work too.

    I'd say those fetches are okay. The only single problem one is Polluted Delta, but for starting out it shouldn't be all that bad. The most important part of the forest fetch is to give you better chance at throwing down Explorers, and Delta gets Bayou gets Explorer. You run the risk of Bayou getting wasted, but fuck it, that specific scenario won't be all that common here. Maybe switch it out later, but don't feel like its going ro ruin your whole deck.

    Play test and buy whichever list makes you happy, but make sure you test such changes. Like taking out Grave Titan and putting in Treetops, which fuck over your mana base.
    I agree with some of this and disagree with some as well. Qweerios knows his GB, so I'd trust his judgment here. I know he's had a great deal of success with Primeval->2x Treetop, specifically. I like a lot of your advice for just like some random standard player who wants to get into it, but if he already owns Thoughtseizes, and wants to just straight up buy dual lands, this isn't a usual case where we need to use kit gloves and gently caress them into the format. Ayotte seems to want to dive in headfirst.

    Also, keep in mind that yeah, while he's had those problems, I'm much more inclined to blame Cockatrice's failure of a random generator. Real-life pilots of the deck have had no problems similar to what he's describing, certainly not to the extent that he has. Sakura-Tribes are unnecessary in G/B, especially in a list without Nightmare. Innocent Blood is okay, the 2nd Tower isn't necessary in G/B, etc. Yeah, they smooth out having / saccing Explorers, but again, real-life pilots don't have trouble with that -- only cockatrice does.

    If you own Thoughtseizes already, more power to you. You definitely do want green fetches, because you always want to be able to fetch a basic forest to go with your Explorer -- that way you don't expose yourself needlessly to wasteland.

    I do agree that IMO Decay splits with Pulse. Probably a 2/2 in G/B?

    But yeah, tl;dr, listen to Qweerios on this one, Ayotte.

  18. #2438
    Member
    Qweerios's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2010
    Location

    Montreal
    Posts

    1,024

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Quote Originally Posted by Gheizen64 View Post
    No Deathrite Shaman? As a 3-of i can't see it as bad in this deck. Pretty nice synergy with liliana too. I wouldn't play more than 3 as multiple of it aren't as good when u run a rock-like deck like nice-fit.
    I honestly don't see what issues Deathrite Shaman solves for Nic Fit.

    @Claymore,

    If you take away the color-fixing aspect of Sakura, you are left only with ramp. Ramping 1 tapped land off of 1G is terrible by Legacy's, and Nic Fit's standards. If you are aiming for a more high CMC/explosive type of GB Nic Fit, I would suggest adding more Towers before secondary/sub-par ramp.
    Do you know what assuming does? It makes an ass out of you and me.
    Get it...? Ass, u, me?

    ... ffs I was trying to be funny...

  19. #2439
    Member
    Ayotte's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Location

    Madison, WI
    Posts

    39

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Well, I can see no reason to believe Arianrhod doesn't know what he's talking about.

  20. #2440

    Re: [Deck] Nic Fit (GBW Explorer Zenith Control)

    Sounds good :P.

    Thoughts on the new Wurm? 2GGWW 5/5 trample, when etb make a 5/5 trample wurm token.

    Feels like the Broodmate Dragon for Rector. I wish it had a Titan attack effect too, but the cycling with Nightmare for trample wurms warms my loins.

    Might be a bit hasty and ill-thought out, but might challenge Grave Titan for its spot considering you can directly GSZ for it. This hints at removing Fierce Empath, although the Sun Titan doesn't quite have a match just yet.
    Last edited by Claymore; 09-18-2012 at 03:07 PM. Reason: fh

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)