Page 57 of 119 FirstFirst ... 74753545556575859606167107 ... LastLast
Results 1,121 to 1,140 of 2375

Thread: [Deck] U/R Delver

  1. #1121
    Member
    blindspotxxx's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2012
    Location

    Manila, Philippines
    Posts

    160

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Glad someone still uses the deck :)

    After playing the other decks I can't seem to go back to U/R Delver lol

    Red needs a power up in Legacy.. Badly!

  2. #1122
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2011
    Location

    Elmira, N.Y
    Posts

    224

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    To my fellow U/R Delver players. I feel very strongly about playing "smash to smithereens" instead of "smelt".
    S2S can get you out from under chalice on 1 and also maintains the tempo that this deck needs.

  3. #1123

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by Mythic Games View Post
    To my fellow U/R Delver players. I feel very strongly about playing "smash to smithereens" instead of "smelt".
    S2S can get you out from under chalice on 1 and also maintains the tempo that this deck needs.
    In terms of maintaining tempo I feel that Smelt is significantly better in this regard, the 1 mana makes too much of a difference, especially with Snapcaster.
    If you expect a lot of chalice of the void in your metagame then I could understand playing Smash to Smithereens, I don't think the difference is really all that significant anyway

  4. #1124

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by H3llsp4wn View Post
    @kombatwiki
    If he's not bad, why does he board into a bad version of SnT, when he has a pretty decent MU? FoW is no argument, since you board in better Blasts...
    I don't know. In general I think he's a better player than I am. Maybe it's just an idea he wanted to try or something

  5. #1125
    Stackbuilder

    Join Date

    Mar 2012
    Posts

    859

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by Mythic Games View Post
    To my fellow U/R Delver players. I feel very strongly about playing "smash to smithereens" instead of "smelt".
    S2S can get you out from under chalice on 1 and also maintains the tempo that this deck needs.
    Search this thread. This discussion has come up several times already.

  6. #1126
    Member

    Join Date

    Jun 2012
    Location

    Atlanta, GA
    Posts

    0

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by Mythic Games View Post
    To my fellow U/R Delver players. I feel very strongly about playing "smash to smithereens" instead of "smelt".
    S2S can get you out from under chalice on 1 and also maintains the tempo that this deck needs.
    Smash to Smithereens is obviously the better card, but that doesn't mean it is the right choice. If you have to play against Chalice of the Void on a regular basis then playing Smelt would be pretty dumb and you should definitely play Smash to Smithereens. In fact, the reason I started playing Smelt in the first place was to beat the Spell Pierces out of Stoneblade, but now that none of the lists are playing Spell Pierce (at least the deathblade decks aren't) it might be correct to go back. I'm not sure though, I really like the 1 mana for Snapcaster.

  7. #1127

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    The only time I cast smelt in the 2 events it got Negated (like, the actual card Negate) so I don't exactly have the most useful sample size

  8. #1128
    Member

    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Montreal, Qc
    Posts

    80

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    This is the list with which I'm trying to incorporate Young Pyromancer. The approach is to max out on ''free'' spells as much as possible and to reduce the number of ''dead'' cards g1. This is why 3-4 Price of Progress and 1-2 Grim Lavamancer would be mandatory in the sideboard. The 2 Vapor Snag could become a Spell Pierce and a Gitaxian Probe. What do you guys think?

    4 Goblin Guide
    4 Delver of Secrets
    2 Grim Lavamancer
    3 Snapcaster Mage
    3 Young Pyromancer

    4 Force of Will
    4 Daze
    2 Spell Pierce
    2 Vapor Snag
    4 Brainstorm
    3 Gitaxian Probe
    4 Lightning Bolt
    3 Chain Lightning

    2 Volcanic Island
    3 Island
    3 Mountain
    4 Scalding Tarn
    3 Misty Rainforest
    3 Arid Mesa

  9. #1129
    Just call me Dick.
    Richard Cheese's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2011
    Location

    Your mom's house.
    Posts

    2,105

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew.Schneider View Post
    Smash to Smithereens is obviously the better card, but that doesn't mean it is the right choice. If you have to play against Chalice of the Void on a regular basis then playing Smelt would be pretty dumb and you should definitely play Smash to Smithereens. In fact, the reason I started playing Smelt in the first place was to beat the Spell Pierces out of Stoneblade, but now that none of the lists are playing Spell Pierce (at least the deathblade decks aren't) it might be correct to go back. I'm not sure though, I really like the 1 mana for Snapcaster.
    If you're running into a lot of Chalice decks, isn't Shattering Spree really where you want to be? Getting to or even shouldn't be that difficult with this deck.
    I think the biggest thing is the deep seeded emotional understanding that the right play is the right play regardless of outcomes. The ability to make a decision 5 straight times, lose 5 times because of it, and still make it the 6th time if it's the right play. - Jon Finkel

    "Notions of chance and fate are the preoccupation of men engaged in rash undertakings."

  10. #1130
    Member
    blindspotxxx's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2012
    Location

    Manila, Philippines
    Posts

    160

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Shattering Spree is a sorcery, I'd rather have Smash that deals 3 damage as well.

  11. #1131
    Member

    Join Date

    Jun 2012
    Location

    Atlanta, GA
    Posts

    0

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    If you're running into a lot of Chalice decks, isn't Shattering Spree really where you want to be? Getting to or even shouldn't be that difficult with this deck.
    The card is reasonable, but you need to have the instant speed for the stoneblade matchup.

  12. #1132

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    I run 2 Smash to Smithereens & 1 Shattering Spree because of abnormally great number of Affinity & Chalice decks in local metagames, also Nivmagus elemental is even more 1 drop filled than normal list, though spree also has nice synergy with Nivmagus.
    But Schneider is absolutely right that instant speed is where you wanna be against Stoneblade, especially if mystic lives.

  13. #1133
    Member
    FANAttIC's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2011
    Location

    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts

    262

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Played legacy tournament yesterday.
    Etched Champion is such a pain. How do you deal with that?
    I have 3 Smash to S. in side and they are good against the rest but against affinity I am control and he just keep coming.
    I was thinking of Jitte but, if Champion is on defense, the Jitte will never get counters (unless I have flipped Delver).
    The best card for me was Price of Progress but Ravager can nullify that plan.

  14. #1134
    Member

    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Montreal, Qc
    Posts

    80

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Possible SB material? Not sure if it does anything better than Sulfuric Vortex but at least we're on the right track.


  15. #1135
    Member
    FANAttIC's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2011
    Location

    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts

    262

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Mindsparker is pure trash for legacy. Maybe some other format.

  16. #1136
    Member

    Join Date

    Apr 2011
    Location

    Catalunya - Spain
    Posts

    16

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by FANAttIC View Post
    Played legacy tournament yesterday.
    Etched Champion is such a pain. How do you deal with that?
    I have 3 Smash to S. in side and they are good against the rest but against affinity I am control and he just keep coming.
    I was thinking of Jitte but, if Champion is on defense, the Jitte will never get counters (unless I have flipped Delver).
    The best card for me was Price of Progress but Ravager can nullify that plan.
    In a meta with Chalice and Trinisphere, and with occasional Affinities, I used to play Meltdown. With X=2 (cmc3) all the affinity lands are destroyed + all the small dudes + equipement + acceleration. Then, you will probably be able to kill the 2/2 with any removal
    A PRO doesn't draw, he tutors every turn.

    JMLL

  17. #1137

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    I'm tired of Goblin Guide. Even with the white splash you still have to clear the way for your ghast. I don't want to worry about foe's creatures at all, really. At least Goblin Baloon Brigade or Cloud of Faries has evasion, LOL. I'm not sure NivMagus card disadvantage is worth it either. I think the new Young Pyromancer might be too slow also, as is Guttersnipe and Talrand. But I'm not satisfied with that GG slot at all and see few good replacements .

    The new vid on SCG shows UR getting it's ass handed to it by DnT, exposing many of the decks problems, though GG isn't as horrible there as it is againat green decks, though GG helps him get his Ports online earlier.

  18. #1138

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Quote Originally Posted by beez View Post
    I'm tired of Goblin Guide. Even with the white splash you still have to clear the way for your ghast. I don't want to worry about foe's creatures at all, really. At least Goblin Baloon Brigade or Cloud of Faries has evasion, LOL. I'm not sure NivMagus card disadvantage is worth it either. I think the new Young Pyromancer might be too slow also, as is Guttersnipe and Talrand. But I'm not satisfied with that GG slot at all and see few good replacements .

    The new vid on SCG shows UR getting it's ass handed to it by DnT, exposing many of the decks problems, though GG isn't as horrible there as it is againat green decks, though GG helps him get his Ports online earlier.
    As someone new to this deck, that vid made me wonder if I made the right choice. It seems like the DnT deck has way better draws against us and if we don't get early pressure (t1 or t2) then it's prob a loss. I thought the whole point of guide was to get 4-6 damage through early then let your burn/delver/lavamancer get you there. I really want this deck to be good, but, damn, I do not want to get my ass handed to me match in, match out like that vid.

  19. #1139
    Rob Rogers
    HammafistRoob's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2007
    Location

    Wareham, MA
    Posts

    1,024

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    You can't win every matchup. Be a man and board Sulfur Elemental if you expect plenty of white dorks. (Creatures, not the players)
    Team Hammafist-We don't take kindly to those who don't take kindly.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jander78 View Post
    You still have to appreciate a well timed "fuck yall niggas" though.
    Quote Originally Posted by FTW View Post
    WotC should either stop printing such good blue creatures or start printing more Hammerfist Giants
    "Got any trade boogas?"

  20. #1140
    Member
    blindspotxxx's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2012
    Location

    Manila, Philippines
    Posts

    160

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Can you link the video? :)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)