Page 221 of 428 FirstFirst ... 121171211217218219220221222223224225231271321 ... LastLast
Results 4,401 to 4,420 of 8554

Thread: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

  1. #4401
    Member

    Join Date

    Jul 2013
    Location

    Orlando fl
    Posts

    12

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Barook View Post
    Jund doesn't run white, though.
    Oo year. I forgot about that. They also run Bob's.

  2. #4402

  3. #4403
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Since I lack the Groves, Taiga and Plateau on MODO and don't want to drop money on it yet, I'm looking for some playtesting on Cockatrice since the general deck/player quality there is pretty poor.

    The Dark Punishing Maverick build looks like it has potential. Having extra removal at hand is pretty handy in fair creature match-ups. Although the mana base indeed looks like a clusterfuck.

    @Tombstalker: PF can also combat enemy Planeswalkers, which is pretty nice to have.

  4. #4404

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    ... Yeah you guys. I'm probably just gonna sell my deck. I think its hilarious that this forum just got the recognition it always deserved; by becoming an established "G/W" Maverick build, and all of you start this GWB nonsense and yeah Thalia is freaking ridiculous considering you have to build part of your manabase around her ( the only damn reason why shes even in the deck is primarily because of what she does to OTHER deck builds) I'm sorry, I thought this was aggro Maverick, not defensive Maverick... Whatever I have much more to say, but its not worth it anyways.. Here's my build if it helps any of you:

    4Knight of The Reliquary
    4Mother of Runes
    4Noble Hierarch
    3Qasali Pridemage
    3Stoneforge Mystic
    3Aven Mindcensor
    2Scavenging Ooze
    2Scryb Ranger

    2Umezawa's Jitte
    1Sword of Light and Shadow

    2Sylvan Library

    4Swords to Plowshares

    4Green Suns Zenith

    2Elspeth, knight Errent

    1Forest
    1Plains
    2Temple Garden
    3Savannah
    4Windswept Heath
    3Horizon Canopy
    3Wasteland
    2Misty Rainforest
    1Dryad Arbor

    Any questions please ask... Ill try and help with my collective knowledge of the meta game and what not, but I don't have much faith in this deck anymore...

  5. #4405
    Foreign Black Border
    Lord_Mcdonalds's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2012
    Location

    Houston, Texas
    Posts

    753

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Nice temple gardens bro.
    Quote Originally Posted by iatee View Post
    I still have a strong suspicion that if 'Thalia, Heretic Cathar' had been named 'Frank, Heretic Cathar', people would be a lot more skeptical of it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Goin Aggro View Post
    Ugh, there he goes again, talking about the girlfriend. We get it dude.

  6. #4406

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Posting my updated list for suggestions/comments. Biggest change was removing Aven Mindcensors for a SFM package and adding the 4th Thalia to MD. I probably have the least amount of experience of any of you guys so any criticism is appreciated. I'll be taking this to a couple small local tournaments this weekend and potentially the open in Baltimore next week.

    Main
    4 Noble Hierarch
    4 Knight of the Reliquary
    4 Mother of Runes
    4 Thalia
    2 Qasali Pridemage
    2 Scavenging Ooze
    3 Stoneforge Mystic
    1 Scryb Ranger
    1 Gaddock Teeg

    4 Swords to Plowshares
    4 GSZ
    1 Sylvan Library
    1 Jitte
    1 Batterskull
    1 Elspeth, Knight-Errant

    4 Wasteland
    4 Savannah
    4 Windswept Heath
    2 Horizon Canopy
    2 Forest
    1 Plains
    1 Misty Rainforest
    1 Maze of Ith
    1 Gaea's Cradle
    1 Karakas
    1 Dryad Arbor
    1 Cavern of Souls

    Side
    2 Choke
    3 Oblivion Ring
    1 Sword of Feast and Famine
    1 Gaddock Teeg
    2 Ethersworn Canonist
    2 Rest in Peace
    1 Loxodon Smiter
    1 Bojuka Bog
    1 Sylvan Safekeeper
    1 Linvala

    Even though GWb may be the right direction, I'm mostly looking for tweaks on the standard GW until I pick up a couple bayous which wouldn't be in this upcoming week anyways.

  7. #4407
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I would like to discuss the new Theros spoiler:

    Polukranos, World-Eater
    Legendary Creature - Hydra
    X Monstrosity X. (If this creature isn’t monstrous, put X +1/+1 counters on it and it becomes monstrous.)
    When Polukranos, World Eater becomes monstrous, it deals X damage divided as you choose among any number of target creatures your opponents control. Each of those creatures deals damage equal to its power to Polukranos.
    5/5

    It might be an upgrade to Master of the Wild Hunt - in the end, it comes down to immunity to Karakas vs immunity to Bolts. Polukranos could also do some insane things in builds with Cradle. Aside from killing a few dudes, it's realistically an 8/8 or 9/9 after pumping which trumps most of the creatures in the format.

    EDIT: It's now back to XX activation cost. If that's true, it's junk.

    On another topic: (Artifact) recursion

    I'm kinda annoyed that destroyed equipment is lost forever, e.g. SoFaF vs. BUG since it downright wins games. An Eternal Witness/Volrath's Stronghold package might sound interesting since you can tutor for both, but the question whether or not those cards fit into the general game plan.

    Quote Originally Posted by bumgun View Post
    Even though GWb may be the right direction, I'm mostly looking for tweaks on the standard GW until I pick up a couple bayous which wouldn't be in this upcoming week anyways.
    Fair enough, otherwise, I would have suggested DRS.

    I would probably run SoFaF in the maindeck. I recently added it and I love it - good against GB/x decks, control and combo. There are also those nifty interactions, e.g. when equiping it to a Dryad Arbor to turn it into a creature with vigilance.

    RiP is bad for you since it makes your Knights crappy.

    In general, I would rather run an E-Tutor board to fish for silver bullets. That also opens up sideboard slots. Both Tormod's Crypt and Grafdigger's Cage are nice GY hate target and fulfill different purposes.

    If you meta is BUG infested, Master of the Wild Hunt might be interesting for you as well since he kills DRS like a champ.

  8. #4408
    Member

    Join Date

    Jul 2013
    Location

    Orlando fl
    Posts

    12

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by bumgun View Post
    Posting my updated list for suggestions/comments. Biggest change was removing Aven Mindcensors for a SFM package and adding the 4th Thalia to MD. I probably have the least amount of experience of any of you guys so any criticism is appreciated. I'll be taking this to a couple small local tournaments this weekend and potentially the open in Baltimore next week.

    Main
    4 Noble Hierarch
    4 Knight of the Reliquary
    4 Mother of Runes
    4 Thalia
    2 Qasali Pridemage
    2 Scavenging Ooze
    3 Stoneforge Mystic
    1 Scryb Ranger
    1 Gaddock Teeg

    4 Swords to Plowshares
    4 GSZ
    1 Sylvan Library
    1 Jitte
    1 Batterskull
    1 Elspeth, Knight-Errant

    4 Wasteland
    4 Savannah
    4 Windswept Heath
    2 Horizon Canopy
    2 Forest
    1 Plains
    1 Misty Rainforest
    1 Maze of Ith
    1 Gaea's Cradle
    1 Karakas
    1 Dryad Arbor
    1 Cavern of Souls

    Side
    2 Choke
    3 Oblivion Ring
    1 Sword of Feast and Famine
    1 Gaddock Teeg
    2 Ethersworn Canonist
    2 Rest in Peace
    1 Loxodon Smiter
    1 Bojuka Bog
    1 Sylvan Safekeeper
    1 Linvala

    Even though GWb may be the right direction, I'm mostly looking for tweaks on the standard GW until I pick up a couple bayous which wouldn't be in this upcoming week anyways.

    I play GW too. Your deck looks similar to mine. I don't play stone forge. I play 2 mind censors 2 jittes and 1 thrun .

    Thurn is a lot better then I expected. Try one out vs heavy removal decks. He's a beast. mind censor is good with 4 thalia becuase it gives you a heavy land disrupion style. 2 jittes becuase 9/10 times thats the equitment you want.

  9. #4409

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_Mcdonalds View Post
    Nice temple gardens bro.
    Thanks. I need them just in case I get a Surgical Extraction played on my Savannahs. Surprisingly though, they don't come out as often because I'm usually able to kill my opponent in less turns than I would need to play them.. The opponents I can kill anyway

  10. #4410

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by bumgun View Post
    Posting my updated list for suggestions/comments. Biggest change was removing Aven Mindcensors for a SFM package and adding the 4th Thalia to MD. I probably have the least amount of experience of any of you guys so any criticism is appreciated. I'll be taking this to a couple small local tournaments this weekend and potentially the open in Baltimore next week.

    Main
    4 Noble Hierarch
    4 Knight of the Reliquary
    4 Mother of Runes
    4 Thalia
    2 Qasali Pridemage
    2 Scavenging Ooze
    3 Stoneforge Mystic
    1 Scryb Ranger
    1 Gaddock Teeg

    4 Swords to Plowshares
    4 GSZ
    1 Sylvan Library
    1 Jitte
    1 Batterskull
    1 Elspeth, Knight-Errant

    4 Wasteland
    4 Savannah
    4 Windswept Heath
    2 Horizon Canopy
    2 Forest
    1 Plains
    1 Misty Rainforest
    1 Maze of Ith
    1 Gaea's Cradle
    1 Karakas
    1 Dryad Arbor
    1 Cavern of Souls

    Side
    2 Choke
    3 Oblivion Ring
    1 Sword of Feast and Famine
    1 Gaddock Teeg
    2 Ethersworn Canonist
    2 Rest in Peace
    1 Loxodon Smiter
    1 Bojuka Bog
    1 Sylvan Safekeeper
    1 Linvala

    Even though GWb may be the right direction, I'm mostly looking for tweaks on the standard GW until I pick up a couple bayous which wouldn't be in this upcoming week anyways.
    Don't run Thalia, It makes the deck look weak (which it isn't). I'm pretty sure that Karakas is there partly because of Thalia as well.. Jesus, Thalia is screwing this deck (Maverick) up one card at a time -_- .. Cant even cast GSZ correctly or your own STPs.. I also think that one more Sylvan Library wouldn't hurt (CA is important in an aggro/disrupt deck) One more Canopy too. People on here wouldn't believe it, but it works awesome with Sylvan

  11. #4411
    Member

    Join Date

    Jul 2013
    Location

    Orlando fl
    Posts

    12

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by AreYouSerious??? View Post
    Don't run Thalia, It makes the deck look weak (which it isn't). I'm pretty sure that Karakas is there partly because of Thalia as well.. Jesus, Thalia is screwing this deck (Maverick) up one card at a time -_- .. Cant even cast GSZ correctly or your own STPs.. I also think that one more Sylvan Library wouldn't hurt (CA is important in an aggro/disrupt deck) One more Canopy too. People on here wouldn't believe it, but it works awesome with Sylvan

    Look here playa. Maverick needs Thalia its the only card that gives you a shot vs control decks , combo decks and some heavy removal aggro decks. The card is the only reason this deck can even have a fair shot vs most decks.

  12. #4412

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    So how exactly do you plan on beating any remotely competitive combo deck without Thalia? Did you notice that Maverick became competitive mostly because of Thalia making the deck not auto-Lose to Storm?

  13. #4413
    ad nauseam blind
    Tombstalker's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2011
    Location

    circles within circles
    Posts

    201

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    YES what AYS says..just forget thalia even exists. She's bad very bad.. I would invite you to post in the DnT thread as well please :)
    You just sent him to the place were brain cells go to die. The Las Vegas of The Source, if you will.
    -The Treefolk Master

  14. #4414

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    also, I'm pretty sure the Karakas isn't there because of Thalia. Actually, if you aren't running Karakas, you probably are doing something wrong.

  15. #4415
    Site Contributor
    apple713's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2012
    Location

    Manhattan, NY
    Posts

    2,086

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I posted about thalia in a diff thread regarding her inclusion. Its relevant here.


    @ Thalia, she is included strictly so I dont get blown out by combo decks. Since I can protect her with mother, that means that she'll not be answered easily by the other decks. The list of decks she affects is

    High tide
    ANT
    TES
    Belcher
    ONMI-derp <----complete blow out if protected.
    are there other combo's going on? enchantress....

    S&T & other decks that cantrip, including rug, UR, miracles, UB tempo decks with stifle
    Shardless (slows the cascade very minimally but still)
    Play 4 Card Blind!

    Currently Playing
    Legacy: Dark Depths
    EDH: 5-Color Hermit Druid

    Currently Brewing: [Deck] Sadistic Sacrament / Chalice NO Eldrazi

    why cards are so expensive...hoarders

  16. #4416
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Hmm, seems the moronic index is high this weekend. Thalia is a pretty good reason to play both D&T and Maverick in a given metagame. Without her, I'd sooner play Vial Bant with Clique and Daze and FoWs.

    As long as Legacy continues to be centered on efficient spells (StP, Brainstorm, Abrupt Decay, Lightning Bolt, etc) Thalia will be good. She's too damn good when paired with Wasteland against such decks.

    Additionally, any argument with the premise that an opponent to Surgical Extractions your dual land is one that I reject and dismiss categorically. This is poor justification for including inferior lands in a two color deck. Play more basics or fetches instead. Actually, play more Wasteland first.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  17. #4417

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Koby View Post
    Hmm, seems the moronic index is high this weekend. Thalia is a pretty good reason to play both D&T and Maverick in a given metagame. Without her, I'd sooner play Vial Bant with Clique and Daze and FoWs.

    As long as Legacy continues to be centered on efficient spells (StP, Brainstorm, Abrupt Decay, Lightning Bolt, etc) Thalia will be good. She's too damn good when paired with Wasteland against such decks.

    Additionally, any argument with the premise that an opponent to Surgical Extractions your dual land is one that I reject and dismiss categorically. This is poor justification for including inferior lands in a two color deck. Play more basics or fetches instead. Actually, play more Wasteland first.
    Sorry Koby, but I'm gonna have to use your post as my whole reply thing considering there is a lot of individuals I have to respond to about my post. First off, I don't think anybody is seeing the bigger picture here, if your running cards like Thalia simply because of the prevalence of (how Koby puts it so adequately) "efficient" spells your are basically making up for the fact that, you yourself, don't have efficient spells. There is an expression that I could use here that would COMPLETELY fit Mavericks situation in the next couple of years and its that you can dress a pig up in a tuxedo, but when it comes to etiquette and manners, its still a pig! Using Thalia as the tuxedo and wrapping the pig (the decks that are already screwing up Mavericks build in order to win against certain decks; might I add that some of those decks are winnable simply because maverick is aggro) with it isn't going to make the lil bugger any more desirable.. Well, maybe :3 but that's in the literal sense. You Koby (in a sense) are exactly on the money with Mavericks problems, as long as legacy is centered around efficient spells, we creature/aggro based strategists are going to be hit HARD. That being said, would it not make sense to go with the flow of super-efficient spells and finally snatch us up some winnings and quite possibly some.. Earnings .. Oh and Koby, you have such a play used on you and come back to post your reaction (not having any dual mana base simply because of someones blatant arrogance would be quite a bitch to come back from) and like I said to all you devoted Maverick fans, if you need help I am more than willing to lend a keyboard ^_^

  18. #4418

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by AreYouSerious??? View Post
    ... Yeah you guys. I'm probably just gonna sell my deck. I think its hilarious that this forum just got the recognition it always deserved; by becoming an established "G/W" Maverick build, and all of you start this GWB nonsense and yeah Thalia is freaking ridiculous considering you have to build part of your manabase around her ( the only damn reason why shes even in the deck is primarily because of what she does to OTHER deck builds) I'm sorry, I thought this was aggro Maverick, not defensive Maverick... Whatever I have much more to say, but its not worth it anyways.. Here's my build if it helps any of you:

    4Knight of The Reliquary
    4Mother of Runes
    4Noble Hierarch
    3Qasali Pridemage
    3Stoneforge Mystic
    3Aven Mindcensor
    2Scavenging Ooze
    2Scryb Ranger

    2Umezawa's Jitte
    1Sword of Light and Shadow

    2Sylvan Library

    4Swords to Plowshares

    4Green Suns Zenith

    2Elspeth, knight Errent

    1Forest
    1Plains
    2Temple Garden
    3Savannah
    4Windswept Heath
    3Horizon Canopy
    3Wasteland
    2Misty Rainforest
    1Dryad Arbor

    Any questions please ask... Ill try and help with my collective knowledge of the meta game and what not, but I don't have much faith in this deck anymore...
    SB:
    3Pithing Needle
    3Gaddock Teeg
    1Bojuka Bog
    Annnnd.. Help me out

  19. #4419

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Tombstalker View Post
    YES what AYS says..just forget thalia even exists. She's bad very bad.. I would invite you to post in the DnT thread as well please :)
    Funny thing actually, I've never done any research on DnT :P . Let me look into it and I'll let you know what I find

  20. #4420
    Member

    Join Date

    Jul 2013
    Location

    Orlando fl
    Posts

    12

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by AreYouSerious??? View Post
    Sorry Koby, but I'm gonna have to use your post as my whole reply thing considering there is a lot of individuals I have to respond to about my post. First off, I don't think anybody is seeing the bigger picture here, if your running cards like Thalia simply because of the prevalence of (how Koby puts it so adequately) "efficient" spells your are basically making up for the fact that, you yourself, don't have efficient spells. There is an expression that I could use here that would COMPLETELY fit Mavericks situation in the next couple of years and its that you can dress a pig up in a tuxedo, but when it comes to etiquette and manners, its still a pig! Using Thalia as the tuxedo and wrapping the pig (the decks that are already screwing up Mavericks build in order to win against certain decks; might I add that some of those decks are winnable simply because maverick is aggro) with it isn't going to make the lil bugger any more desirable.. Well, maybe :3 but that's in the literal sense. You Koby (in a sense) are exactly on the money with Mavericks problems, as long as legacy is centered around efficient spells, we creature/aggro based strategists are going to be hit HARD. That being said, would it not make sense to go with the flow of super-efficient spells and finally snatch us up some winnings and quite possibly some.. Earnings .. Oh and Koby, you have such a play used on you and come back to post your reaction (not having any dual mana base simply because of someones blatant arrogance would be quite a bitch to come back from) and like I said to all you devoted Maverick fans, if you need help I am more than willing to lend a keyboard ^_^
    Maverick is a midrange aggro deck. Meaning its a slow deck that wins mid game. Therefore vs other faster decks you can get ran over. The deck plays disructive cards like Thalia, mind censor , and teeg ect. To slow decks down so it can win mid late game. You need Thalia bro. Sorry

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)