Page 286 of 299 FirstFirst ... 186236276282283284285286287288289290296 ... LastLast
Results 5,701 to 5,720 of 5963

Thread: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

  1. #5701
    Member
    door's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2011
    Location

    Russia, SPb
    Posts

    128

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
    I won a 32 person GPT yesterday with ANT, playing the following list

    4 Brainstorm
    4 Ponder
    4 Gitaxian Probe
    3 Preordain

    4 Cabal Therapy
    2 Duress

    4 Dark Ritual
    4 Cabal Ritual
    4 Lotus Petal
    4 Black Lotus
    Really? Than it's not a surprise that you won =)
    Nothing is true, everything is permitted...

  2. #5702
    Greatness awaits!
    Lemnear's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2010
    Location

    Berlin, Germany
    Posts

    6,997

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by door View Post
    Really? Than it's not a surprise that you won =)
    Lol
    www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!

    Join us at Facebook!

    Quote Originally Posted by Echelon View Post
    Lemnear sounds harsh at times, but he means well. Or to destroy, but that's when he starts rapping.

    Architect by day, rapstar by night. He's pretty much the German Hannah Montana. Sometimes he even comes in like a wrecking ball.

  3. #5703
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2010
    Location

    Seattle, WA
    Posts

    182

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
    I'm intrigued by the people putting Ad Nauseam in the board and maindecking the Empty the Warrens in it's place, but I'm not sure I'm prepared to get rid of my crutch just yet.
    I sat next to someone at the seattle scg who died from 20, 19, and 18 with ad nauseam on the day there may have been more. I cast it I think once on the day, I was maindecking it again but I typically hate the card, but understand that sometimes it is needed for the early wins.

    I may cut it again, but at the same time want to add maybe a chrome mox or two to the board to make it better. Having to flip with no floating and no land drop and having to hit one of 3 petals, two rituals, LED, tutor is kind of rough sometimes, mainly the IMS. I feel much better about AN when I haven't used any petals and have a land drop floating

    Played the burning wish list from a little bit above. Really liked it I tweaked the sideboard a bit and want to do some more tweaking. But it felt really good, meltdown'd away two mox diamonds and a chalice in a G1, that felt dumb. Also definitely used IGG at least 3 times on the day. once there was no other path, the other times were probably ok to do something else but this worked the best. also a great swap for AN in the burn match up.


    For the burning wish versions teferi's realm may be too slow but a decent on color answer to CB. 3 mana is a ton though and by then they have probably found a counter spell for it or can set up a floating force via top (after you bounce the CB), also gives them a turn to set all of this up.

  4. #5704

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    For me Burning Wish is more of a crutch than anything else. I know the deck might be better without it, but I just can't let it go. I can't stand thinking I could just lose to T1 Shaman, T2 Seize my Tendrils and remove it. And Empty the Warrens has won me too many game too.

    I do admit I like to get a bit cute on the Wishboard, I used to play even a freakin' Ill-Gotten Gains. I even tried out playing a Reforge the Soul, for the draw 7 effect without the shuffle. But the mana cost is just to strict.

    I have a big tournament on Nov 15, and I'm just defaulting to the Burning Wish list. Anyone got any suggestions for the Wishboard?

  5. #5705

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Has anyone tested Entomb as a 1/2 of for use as a Tutor for PiF, and afterwards a Tutor to grab an instant/sorcery to play from the 'yard? I think it should at least be looked at. Maybe it's too dangerous with all the gy hate, but I was thinking about this last night and thought that maybe it should be tested. It's pretty solid in theory.

    -ABC

  6. #5706
    Member
    Dzra's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Location

    Plano, Texas
    Posts

    911

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by alderon666 View Post
    Anyone got any suggestions for the Wishboard?
    This is what can be wished for in my SB. It's possible that Virtue's Ruin will be replaced by that new commander thing.

    SB: 1 Duress
    SB: 1 Empty the Warrens
    SB: 1 Massacre
    SB: 1 Meltdown
    SB: 1 Past in Flames
    SB: 1 Reverent Silence
    SB: 1 Tendrils of Agony
    SB: 1 Virtue's Ruin

  7. #5707

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    Has anyone tested Entomb as a 1/2 of for use as a Tutor for PiF, and afterwards a Tutor to grab an instant/sorcery to play from the 'yard? I think it should at least be looked at. Maybe it's too dangerous with all the gy hate, but I was thinking about this last night and thought that maybe it should be tested. It's pretty solid in theory.

    -ABC
    I tested Entomb once. I don't think it works how you think it does though. When you flashback Entomb, the 2nd card you find can't be cast, so it essentially is irrelevant to flashback except for corner cases of getting Therapy with goblins in play.

  8. #5708
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2010
    Location

    Seattle, WA
    Posts

    182

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Dzra View Post
    This is what can be wished for in my SB. It's possible that Virtue's Ruin will be replaced by that new commander thing.

    SB: 1 Duress
    SB: 1 Empty the Warrens
    SB: 1 Massacre
    SB: 1 Meltdown
    SB: 1 Past in Flames
    SB: 1 Reverent Silence
    SB: 1 Tendrils of Agony
    SB: 1 Virtue's Ruin
    why not play infest over the new commander thing kills almost everything you want with no life spent and costs the same. i cannot think of any x/3's you want to kill.

  9. #5709
    Member
    Dzra's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Location

    Plano, Texas
    Posts

    911

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by ThomasDowd View Post
    why not play infest over the new commander thing kills almost everything you want with no life spent and costs the same. i cannot think of any x/3's you want to kill.
    Yeah that's a fair point. I feel like there must have been a reason I was running Virtue's Ruin over Infest, but nothing is coming to mind at the moment.

  10. #5710
    banned

    Join Date

    Jul 2013
    Location

    black metal bed room
    Posts

    2,188

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Dzra View Post
    Yeah that's a fair point. I feel like there must have been a reason I was running Virtue's Ruin over Infest, but nothing is coming to mind at the moment.
    KotR and any Sword of This and That equipping Teeg.

  11. #5711

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by door View Post
    Really? Than it's not a surprise that you won =)
    Believe it or not, that was totally unintentional. Brain fart :)

    Played at a small tournament last night, took the list from the GPT, moved Ad Nauseam to the board in place of the 3rd Carpet of Flowers, then put Empty the Warrens main. In my extremely limited testing, Empty was freaking horrible. Anytime I was behind and Ad Nauseam would've been bad, Empty was worse because all of the aggressive deck have fliers, so Empty can't block them to save me. I almost lost to affinity because I ended up with a hand that was all rituals and Empty while I was still at like 16, and Ad Naus would've been way better. I played against Sneak and Show, Affinity, Lands, and UWR Delver and sided it out almost every matchup (I may have left it in vs Sneak and Show, don't remember). In the matchups where they're most likely to have Leyline, Empty is the worst kill spell because they can just race it when you're not playing it turn 1 like TES.

    I do think I want an Empty in the board for Surgical Extraction decks maybe, but even then I've been playing this for almost 6 months and I've only had Tendrils extracted or Deathrited like twice. Sure, it can happen, but it's not nearly actually all that likely.

  12. #5712

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    I actually agree and disagree with Jeff. I don't think taking Ad Nauseam out of the deck is that great. It frustrates me when people refer to it as a "crutch". That is just not true. What it is, is just another option, another line of play.. Like Jeff was saying, There are situations where AN is just hands down the best line available. Now, that being said, i do think there are times where EtW is just awesome. Which is one of the reason i enjoy playing Burning Wish in my deck.

    I'm also surprised you were siding out EtW against UWR. I guess if they're packing a bunch of EE it can be sketchy, and Batterskull is not very friendly either. But i actually think EtW is amazing against those types of decks. It lets you go off without needing as much gas, so you can take advantage of your opponent lacking an answer or being tapped down much easier. A top decked or Brainstormed EE will probably make me cry though. What is everyone else's strategy for UWR? There are a few UWR variations running around our locals, and it's never an easy match.

    Also, i'm not sure EtW is in the board to beat extraction. I mean yeah, that's one thing it can do, but i really like EtW against tempo decks. There are 2 UR Delvers in our local meta and EtW is an all-star against it. Against RUG and similar decks, a quick EtW is just nasty. I feel like i find myself siding it in a lot.


    @alderon666
    I only run 2 maindecked Wishes with 2 Preordain as extra cantrips.

    My wish board is currently looking like this

    2 Empty the Warrens
    1 Tendrils of Agony
    1 Pyroclasm
    1 Massacre
    1 Cabal Therapy
    2 Thoughtseize

    The 2nd EtW is the newest thing i have been trying and i actually love it. What that lets me do is bring in an Empty and still have one in the board to wish for. The extra discard is because i'm not running G right now. There haven't been any counterbalance around for a while here, so i figure the G splash is just unnecessary. Sometimes i do want extra disruption to bring in though, and without Xantid Swarms, Thoughtseize seems to fit the bill. Again the extra discard lets me side 2 in, and still have 1 in the board to wish for.

  13. #5713

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by AlleywayJack View Post
    Against RUG and similar decks, a quick EtW is just nasty.

    I must be missing something, I guess. If you're at a high enough life against RUG that you can afford to make 10 or 14 goblins and wait two more turns to finish them off, when they have burn and Delvers that can go over the top, aren't you usually at a high enough life to just Ad Nauseam?

  14. #5714

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
    I must be missing something, I guess. If you're at a high enough life against RUG that you can afford to make 10 or 14 goblins and wait two more turns to finish them off, when they have burn and Delvers that can go over the top, aren't you usually at a high enough life to just Ad Nauseam?
    Empty is normally a turn 1/2 play. It only costs 4 mana from hand and 6 from Wish, you normally go all-in on turn 1 or play a discard first and then do it the next turn.

    It's good if you know you're not facing Batterskull.

    I'll probably go for something like this:

    SB: 1 Duress
    SB: 1 Empty the Warrens
    SB: 1 Massacre
    SB: 1 Meltdown
    SB: 1 Past in Flames
    SB: 1 Tendrils of Agony
    SB: 1 Toxic Deluge

    I won't have a green splash, probably just gonna conceed to a resolved CB and leave it at that.


    The reason to go for Toxic Deluge instead of Infest is obviously to kill Emrakul by paying 15 life... duh!

  15. #5715

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Patrunkenphat7 View Post
    I tested Entomb once. I don't think it works how you think it does though. When you flashback Entomb, the 2nd card you find can't be cast, so it essentially is irrelevant to flashback except for corner cases of getting Therapy with goblins in play.
    Why can't you cast the second card you find? That makes no sense to me.

    -ABC

  16. #5716

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Oh snap, i haven't seen Toxic Deluge yet. I'm not exactly sure it's that great though. You could easily get away with Virtue's Ruin and not pay any life. Honestly though i like Pyroclasm the best as a wishable sweeper. It can't beat Mom and a hatebear but it is the cheapest option. I find it a lot easier to play Pyroclasm and then combo off, than any of the other options. With Thalia your looking at paying 4 mana for a sweeper. That's steep.

    Is Meltdown really worth it? I play it in my DDFT sideboard but i'm not sure it's really necessary here. Although if you have Affinity or some MUD in your meta i guess you could put up an argument for it.

    You don't have to just scoop to CB. I'm playing 2-3 Wipe Away in the board, just in case i do run into it. It's crude but an EOT Wipe Away will do the trick.

    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    Why can't you cast the second card you find? That makes no sense to me.

    -ABC
    Past in Flames only gives the cards currently in your grave flashback. So any card put in after PiF resolves wont have flashback.

  17. #5717
    Member
    Dzra's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Location

    Plano, Texas
    Posts

    911

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by AlleywayJack View Post
    Is Meltdown really worth it? I play it in my DDFT sideboard but i'm not sure it's really necessary here.
    Possibly not. It's mainly there for Chalice, which can be played around or Abrupt Decay'd. It can possibly hit Revoker also (out of a non-W deck) since I don't run Pyroclasm. I mostly just don't like SBing a lot with this deck and outside of the obligatory 3 Abrupt Decay and 3 Xantid Swarm, I usually find that I have plenty of extra space for situational tutor targets.

  18. #5718

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    Why can't you cast the second card you find? That makes no sense to me.

    -ABC
    AlleywayJack answered it above; PiF only give flashback to card in the GY at the time it resolves.

    Empty is sick because it provides speed for a relatively "slow" combo deck. Turn 1 10+goblins or turn 2 12+ goblins is a more consistent kill than turn 2 AN often with no mana floating. I could spend all day listing the corner cases where you want a win-con other than tendrils and goblin synergies like Therapy, but the real reason it's good is that it gives you a truly fast line of action because your opponent can hit you with a Thoughtseize or set up their threat with a slew of soft counters.

  19. #5719
    Member

    Join Date

    Apr 2012
    Location

    Schenectady,NY
    Posts

    39

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Really wish there was a way to make a Doomsday line good in Wish ANT. Any Wish players ever tried it?

  20. #5720
    Site Contributor
    Admiral_Arzar's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2010
    Location

    Denver, CO
    Posts

    1,289

    Re: [DTB] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils)

    Top 4'd my local with this list. Went 3-1, beating Dark Maverick, RUG, and Merfolk while losing to Jund (!).

    4 Lotus Petal
    4 Lion's Eye Diamond
    4 Dark Ritual
    4 Cabal Ritual

    4 Gitaxian Probe
    4 Ponder
    4 Brainstorm
    2 Preordain
    2 Lim-Dul's Vault
    4 Infernal Tutor

    3 Duress
    3 Cabal Therapy

    1 Tendrils of Agony
    1 Past in Flames
    1 Ad Nauseam

    4 Polluted Delta
    4 Misty Rainforest
    1 Island
    1 Swamp
    2 Underground Sea
    1 Volcanic Island
    2 Gemstone Mine

    Sideboard
    2 Chain of Vapor
    3 Xantid Swarm
    3 Carpet of Flowers
    3 Dread of Night
    3 Abrupt Decay
    1 Tropical Island

    The Jund loss came down to killing myself with Ad Nauseam game 2 (from fifteen with a land drop, sometimes you just get unlucky) and getting a slow hand that got blown out by Extirpate on Infernal Tutor in game 3. I have done extensive testing against this matchup and found it to be strongly favorable pre and post-board, but sometimes you just lose regardless. I didn't drop a game in any of the other matches. The deck feels really solid, as always LDV and Preordain are the weak links but since I lack Grim Tutors I don't have anything to replace them with. As this deck is a little slow I might test SDT in place of Preordain sometime. I cut Empty the Warrens from the board because I never actually boarded it in, and never really wanted it in any matchup. If I add it back in I may just move the Tropical to the maindeck to make room - the sideboard is very strong currently.

    Quote Originally Posted by MTG Junkie View Post
    Really wish there was a way to make a Doomsday line good in Wish ANT. Any Wish players ever tried it?
    I haven't tried it, but now that we're playing Gitaxian Probe, all you would have to do is drop some other cantrip for SDT and cut a random card for Ideas Unbound.
    Lord of the Chalice

    Quote Originally Posted by Julian23 View Post
    Since playing against Spiral Tide provides a lot fun for both players is something only someone who's not had sex for quite a while could enjoy, I pull out GW Maverick.
    Quote Originally Posted by Brainstorm Ape View Post
    Spikes are supposed to enjoy winning by leveraging their talents, but this card can't fetch the most SKILL INTENSIVE card in all of Magic?

    Clearly aimed at Modern plebs, not gonna be a pillar of our format.
    Stompy Discord: https://discord.gg/6cesvkz

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)