Page 21 of 23 FirstFirst ... 1117181920212223 LastLast
Results 401 to 420 of 445

Thread: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

  1. #401
    It's Tricky

    Join Date

    Nov 2009
    Posts

    209

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    Who cares what they should be called? They all run TNN and it's warping the meta towards decks with TNN / Anti-TNN decks / Decks that don't care about TNN (combo). Is that a healthy meta?
    My point had less to do with nomenclature and more to do with the fact they're named a certain way because they're the linchpin of the deck. They are not TNN decks.

    I disagree with the level of warping TNN is causing. And format warping itself isn't necessarily a bad thing for that matter. That's what a metagame is. Different effects people have to plan around.

  2. #402

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by 2Rach View Post
    And format warping itself isn't necessarily a bad thing for that matter. That's what a metagame is. Different effects people have to plan around.
    This argument could easily be used for Hulk Flash or Mental Misstep.

  3. #403
    It's Tricky

    Join Date

    Nov 2009
    Posts

    209

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    This argument could easily be used for Hulk Flash or Mental Misstep.
    Indeed. But like I said, I don't agree with the degree of warping.

  4. #404
    Pray for Rain
    Tammit67's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Philadelphia, PA, USA
    Posts

    1,534

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    This argument could easily be used for Hulk Flash or Mental Misstep.
    Sure, but that would be disingenuous to the point he is making :)
    Matt Bevenour in real life

  5. #405

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by 2Rach View Post
    Indeed. But like I said, I don't agree with the degree of warping.
    Just because you don't disagree with the amount of warping doesn't make said warping good for the game. Ergo, WotC will ban cards if they cause too much negative warping.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tammit67 View Post
    Sure, but that would be disingenuous to the point he is making :)
    The argument about a deck being a TNN or not a TNN deck is irrelevant. Maybe that's a secret joke...?

  6. #406
    It's Tricky

    Join Date

    Nov 2009
    Posts

    209

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    Just because you don't disagree with the amount of warping doesn't make said warping good for the game.
    True. And? I think the effect TNN is playing is being overhyped.

  7. #407

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by 2Rach View Post
    True. And? I think the effect TNN is playing is being overhyped.
    There's enough data to show that this is not the case. Anyways, this has gone off topic long enough. I'll continue this in the B/R thread.

  8. #408
    In response: Snapcaster Mage
    catmint's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2011
    Posts

    923

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by 2Rach View Post

    UWR Delver was a thing before TNN. Did you call it a Geist of Saint Traft deck?

    Stoneblade was a thing before TNN. Did you call it a Lingering Souls deck?

    Deathblade was a thing before TNN. Did you call it a Dark Confidant deck?

    BUG Delver was a thing before TNN. Did you call it an Abrupt Decay deck?

    You're not following yourselves logically.

    It's a good card with a wide range of uses. It's not a card that can be defined as an archetype.

    But if we differ on this, let's just agree to disagree.
    Well they are TNN decks in the sense of they adopt 1 card (TNN) to replace other cards (confidant, souls, geist, tombstalker) to get better. They are not TNN decks in the sense of that their whole gameplan revolves around TNN. Anyway I think the point is that format diversity is hurt.
    Currently playing: Elves

  9. #409
    Member
    Norm's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2011
    Location

    Dalian, China
    Posts

    191

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Am I in the BOTG spoiler thread? I literally just got done reading through a bunch of TNN rants in the banned and restricted thread, then found myself here in the exact same place.


    Dafuq?

  10. #410
    Legacy Vagabond
    Shawon's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2007
    Location

    Cheshire, CT
    Posts

    1,091

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    Am I in the BOTG spoiler thread? I literally just got done reading through a bunch of TNN rants in the banned and restricted thread, then found myself here in the exact same place.


    Dafuq?
    I've seen SCD threads completely derailed into B/R topics, but never have I ever seen a spoiler thread with a full page of B/R posts. Wow.

    EDIT: Come to our rescue, Nihil Credo!

  11. #411
    Sushi or Meat and Eggs
    Cire's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Posts

    2,253

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    What ever happened to talking about how shitty this set was?

  12. #412

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Cire View Post
    What ever happened to talking about how shitty this set was?
    Spirit of the Labyrinth happened.

  13. #413
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Italy, Eternal
    Posts

    1,848

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Cire View Post
    What ever happened to talking about how shitty this set was?
    Set is too shitty for me to even care about how shitty the set is. For how much "top down" flavor this set should be, it feel like crap. Enchantment creature in a greek block? What's greek about that? I CAN see scry, but everything else what the hell. Everything being a creature don't really sit in a set that should be about flavor: what about all the philosophers and we got what, 0 reference on them? Poets? No instead we get enchantment creatures, seriously. We got no lands of the city-states either. Instead we got dragons. Innistrad was 10 times this block was in term of flavor and i don't think it was done particularly well either, but at least it wasn't as ugly as this.

  14. #414
    Some dipshit of a Moderator.
    Dice_Box's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2013
    Location

    A Tabernacle in some random Valley.
    Posts

    4,843

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Seth View Post
    Spirit of the Labyrinth happened.
    I smiled. Well played.
    It is better to ask and look stupid then keep your mouth shut and remain so.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spam View Post
    Do not make fun of lands masters, they've spent many years mastering the punishing fire technique in the secret loam monastery. Do not mistake them with the miracles masters, eternal rivals, they won't like it.
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    I hope your afterlife is filled with eternal torment.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dice_Box View Post
    Fuck. Which one of my quotes do I drop for this?
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    Something about how fun it is pulling the wings off flies and microwaving the neighbors cat?

  15. #415
    Member

    Join Date

    Apr 2011
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    313

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    TNN discussions are really offtopic here. Just ban the damn thing! There is nothing more to say about it.

  16. #416
    Member
    Norm's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2011
    Location

    Dalian, China
    Posts

    191

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by joven View Post
    TNN discussions are really offtopic here. Just ban the damn thing! There is nothing more to say about it.
    "Hey man, we should really stop arguing here.

    P.S: Screw you!"

  17. #417

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemnear View Post
    Rather than using their brain to combat that duo, they simply run it too.
    Playing a deck is a great way to learn its weaknesses/bad matchups and learn how to beat it. So, I can see people who hate TNN also use it for this reason.

  18. #418
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,496

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Cire View Post
    What ever happened to talking about how shitty this set was?
    Not worth talking about.

    SoL is good, Lion King might be good (but needs testing), the rest is shit. Too much overcosted crap or underpowered cards. Take Satyr Firedancer for example: It's an interesting card and would certainly fit a balls-to-the-walls aggro strategy, but a 1/1 vanilla body makes it incredibly underwhelming for said plan.

  19. #419

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Gheizen64 View Post
    Set is too shitty for me to even care about how shitty the set is. For how much "top down" flavor this set should be, it feel like crap. Enchantment creature in a greek block? What's greek about that? I CAN see scry, but everything else what the hell. Everything being a creature don't really sit in a set that should be about flavor: what about all the philosophers and we got what, 0 reference on them? Poets? No instead we get enchantment creatures, seriously. We got no lands of the city-states either. Instead we got dragons. Innistrad was 10 times this block was in term of flavor and i don't think it was done particularly well either, but at least it wasn't as ugly as this.
    It was more about myths and shit. It doesn't help that we already have a lot of Greek mythos imbued in our creature base (i.e. shit like minotaurs and cyclops exist already) . I like the flavor behind enchantment creatures but to each their own I guess.


    I find it really strange how twofaced the community is about new stuff. We bash the new sets for being shitty, then get mad when they print stuff that actually makes an impact. I guess like most gaming communities we simply don't know what we want but we sure are unhappy with what we got. With the downside that Wizards doesn't seem to get it right either. :(

    Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  20. #420
    Say no to creatures.

    Join Date

    May 2013
    Posts

    387

    Re: [Born of the Gods] Spoiler Thread

    The impact could be more subtle like Wear/Tear, Abrupt Decay, Craterhoof Behemoth etc. etc.
    Legacy: Rituals
    Vintage: Drains

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)