Page 140 of 258 FirstFirst ... 4090130136137138139140141142143144150190240 ... LastLast
Results 2,781 to 2,800 of 5144

Thread: [Deck] Imperial Painter

  1. #2781
    Member
    grim confident's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2011
    Location

    bj,china
    Posts

    26

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    I just started to build Painters deck.
    which MU Firebolt is a keycard?
    elves? delver? DRS?
    I do not really understand his purpose.

  2. #2782
    Member
    mcbain's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2014
    Location

    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts

    266

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    All of the above. Don't forget death and taxes. Bob. Pyro mancer. Planeswalkers.

  3. #2783
    Member
    grim confident's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2011
    Location

    bj,china
    Posts

    26

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by mcbain View Post
    All of the above. Don't forget death and taxes. Bob. Pyro mancer. Planeswalkers.
    thanks.

    but We really have enough time to flashback it?

    4 is not too much?

  4. #2784
    Member
    mcbain's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2014
    Location

    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts

    266

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    It's 5. And no.

    That being said sometimes I prefer lightning bolt. The. Again you can mill yourself EOT for a burn spell.

  5. #2785

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    @mcbain

    Uba Mask seems like an awesome idea, even without the double Welder lock. Maybe it's a bit narrow in term of match-up impacted though but I'll definitely give it a try when I understand the deck at a decent level.

    Could you explain why you feel that 4 Imperial Recruiters is better? Saying that experienced people do it like that is good, but that does not help in the convincing process

    @grim confident and mcbain

    I think by asking "4 is not too much", grim confident talked about the number of slots, not the casting cost.

  6. #2786

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    So a big reason I run 4 is because when you have a moon effect out with a SDT you have no other way of shuffling other than using petal into tutor and personally I would rather keep petal in play since I run 3 welders.


    EDIT: Also welder is our best card against abrupt decay MU. And recruiter is our only tutor for them.

  7. #2787

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Recruiter is the glue that holds the deck together. Play it for awhile and I'm 100% sure you'll agree. I'm literally never sorry to draw a Recruiter.

  8. #2788
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2014
    Location

    West Chester, PA
    Posts

    192

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by Lysandros View Post
    Recruiter is the glue that holds the deck together. Play it for awhile and I'm 100% sure you'll agree. I'm literally never sorry to draw a Recruiter.
    I've been sad to draw it on multiple occasions.

  9. #2789

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by drude1 View Post
    It's a combo deck. And the sooner you can get your combo pieces together the better.
    I agree that isochron scepter and bottled cloister are questionable at best. Isochron scepter seems far worse and while I don’t think Bottled Cloister is the right choice I think it’s a better choice than Isochron scepter.

    I do want to question this statement though. Imperial Painter isn’t a true combo deck. There are plenty of elements to this deck which are not there to farther our combo plan but instead to buy time/turns much like a control deck would. I think this deck fits perfectly into box of combo or control, and if anything would fit more into the overlapping space in the middle of the Venn diagram. I do agree that R/W favors combo more than Mono Red.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lysandros View Post
    Recruiter is the glue that holds the deck together. Play it for awhile and I'm 100% sure you'll agree. I'm literally never sorry to draw a Recruiter.
    I don't believe in "sacred cows" so I think entertaining the idea that Imperial Recruiter might not need to be a 4 of in this deck isn't inherently wrong, and I think there are times when drawing a Recruiter is worse than drawing a grindstone or something else. That said, it often can reset your top deck, or find a silver bullet (Revoker, Jaya Ballard, Magus, Welder, Spellskite, Vexing Shusher, Manic Vandal, Martyr of Ash, and a bunch of other situationally good cards.) and find half your win condition. It’s also a champ at chumping.

  10. #2790
    Member

    Join Date

    Oct 2012
    Location

    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts

    229

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Imperial Recruiter can sometimes be chained to supply you with a steady amount of chump blockers - which is always nice :D

    That being said, look at the recruiter like this:

    It serves as a tutor for half the combo - Check!
    But playing 4 Painter's Servants AND 4 Recruiters, you're effectively playing 8 Painter's Servants. Cutting 1 Recruiter can be justified.

    If you're playing a 4 Goblin Welder build (MonoR) like, I am, cutting 1 recruiter can be a valid choice.

    But ultimately, I believe it's a meta game choice.

    The meta I'm playing in currently is full of Elves and MUD decks, which leaves me to play 2 Manic Vandals... I prefer to essentially play 6 Manic Vandals after board against MUD, but to each it's own ;)

    Either way - 3 or 4.... Do what feels right for you :)

  11. #2791

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Guys, sudden shock can replace firbolt in the sb?

  12. #2792

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by ORDAL View Post
    Guys, sudden shock can replace firbolt in the sb?
    For sure. Flashback is great but sometimes split second is better.

  13. #2793
    Member

    Join Date

    Dec 2014
    Location

    West Lafayette, IN
    Posts

    112

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Sudden shock was great for the monastery swiftspears; plus has some use against infect.

  14. #2794

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by Uroborian View Post
    Sudden shock was great for the monastery swiftspears; plus has some use against infect.
    Also D&T. They can't activate Mom in response to you blowing whatever creature of theirs is causing you problems. Most often it's phyrexian revoker on Grindstone..

  15. #2795
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2014
    Location

    West Chester, PA
    Posts

    192

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Also good if anybody in your meta is running monastery mentor

  16. #2796
    Member
    mcbain's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2014
    Location

    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts

    266

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    http://magic.tcgplayer.com/db/article.asp?ID=12397

    Article on jacks recent barreling.

  17. #2797
    Member
    drude1's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Location

    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts

    670

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    I run sudden shocks and love them. Right now I am splitting between those and pyrokinesis.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  18. #2798

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Has anyone tested Rending Volley yet? I like the card a lot, kills most things with a painter in play (except for goyf or tasigur) and can't be countered.

  19. #2799
    Member
    mcbain's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2014
    Location

    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts

    266

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Drude1: please elaborate. I've used both before and could likely see the argument for pyrokinesis right now but I'll wait for your arguments.

    Totenbot: let's discuss this in relation to lightning bolt, sudden shock and fire bolt. I wouldn't push the 4 damage thing as its not as relevant.

    It does not: hit players or Planeswalkers, does not hit many things in junk-jund decks, specifically DRS, doesn't get passed an active mother...

    What it does do well: everything your 6-8 red blasts already do. Kills an equipped thalia mid combat with revoker in play on mother while he has a vial on 2 and you just countered his STP by welding painter back in for the bridge he just got under by minusing his guy! Oh wait. Let's just stick with the ones I mentioned

    (sorry, don't mean to troll. Just bored at work for a minute).

    Although with an active painter it does get better. Like you said.

  20. #2800

    Re: [Deck] Imperial Painter

    Quote Originally Posted by mcbain View Post
    Drude1: please elaborate. I've used both before and could likely see the argument for pyrokinesis right now but I'll wait for your arguments.

    Totenbot: let's discuss this in relation to lightning bolt, sudden shock and fire bolt. I wouldn't push the 4 damage thing as its not as relevant.

    It does not: hit players or Planeswalkers, does not hit many things in junk-jund decks, specifically DRS, doesn't get passed an active mother...

    What it does do well: everything your 6-8 red blasts already do. Kills an equipped thalia mid combat with revoker in play on mother while he has a vial on 2 and you just countered his STP by welding painter back in for the bridge he just got under by minusing his guy! Oh wait. Let's just stick with the ones I mentioned

    (sorry, don't mean to troll. Just bored at work for a minute).

    Although with an active painter it does get better. Like you said.
    All things I was kind of thinking about, but yeah, I mostly agree.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)