Page 314 of 428 FirstFirst ... 214264304310311312313314315316317318324364414 ... LastLast
Results 6,261 to 6,280 of 8554

Thread: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

  1. #6261
    get outta here, humanity.
    iamajellydonut's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2009
    Location

    Butugychag
    Posts

    2,031

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by tescrin View Post
    Now, while damage has been done you're still an "attacking creature" until the end of the combat damage step (or possibly to the end of combat step. I don't quite remember at the moment as I haven't had to care.
    I may be mixing up
    • 511.3. As soon as the end of combat step ends, all creatures and planeswalkers are removed from combat. After the end of combat step ends, the combat phase is over and the postcombat main phase begins (see rule 505).
    Quote Originally Posted by sdematt View Post
    tits.

  2. #6262
    Member

    Join Date

    Mar 2010
    Location

    Rochester NY
    Posts

    8

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by tescrin View Post
    It's not "double attacking" it's psuedo vigilance.

    To understand you have to understand the combat steps:



    Now, while damage has been done you're still an "attacking creature" until the end of the combat damage step (or possibly to the end of combat step. I don't quite remember at the moment as I haven't had to care.
    I may be mixing up
    That actually made it very clear. Thanks for that!

  3. #6263

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I am new to the forum and i hope you guys might be able to make some positive contributions
    I will use this list im my local store in Brazil within 35-38 players, but most of all using control and combo decks and is quite painful to play against (storm, reanimator, bug shardless, stoneblade, miracles....)
    How does this list look?

    4x Deathrite Shaman
    4x Knight of the Reliquary
    3x Mother of Runes
    3x Thalia, Guardian of Thraben
    2x Stoneforge mystic
    1x Sylvan safekeeper
    1x Gaddock teeg
    1x qasali pridemage
    1x Scavenging ooze
    1x Dryad arbor


    4x Green Sun Zenith
    3x Abrupt Decay
    3x Swords to Plowshares
    2x Hymn to tourach
    1x Thoughtseize

    2x Sylvan Library
    1x Umezawa's Jitte
    1x Sword of fire and ice

    4x Verdant catacombs
    4x Windswept Heath
    4x Wasteland

    2x Savannah
    2x Scrubland
    1x Bayou
    1x Karakas
    1x Horizon Canopy
    1x Plains
    1x Swamp
    1x Forest

  4. #6264
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Maindeck discard is generally worse than either removal or additional disruptive creatures. There's also the dissynergy between Thalia and <spells>. I would recommend Liliana over Hymn or Thoughtseize as hand disruption, but not over more Thalia first.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  5. #6265

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I agree with Koby. But if you really want a main deck discard spell to hedge against combo, I'd go with Tidehollow Sculler because he's also a clock. Also, BB can be hard to achieve.

  6. #6266
    Is Cancer

    Join Date

    Jul 2014
    Posts

    1,146

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by iamajellydonut View Post
    • 511.3. As soon as the end of combat step ends, all creatures and planeswalkers are removed from combat. After the end of combat step ends, the combat phase is over and the postcombat main phase begins (see rule 505).
    I'm unsure if this is meant as clarification or refutation. I'll say that it doesn't work as a refutation, but I don't want to get into rules talk unless we're actually in disagreement; in which case it's probably better to send it to the rules forum anyway.

    Quote Originally Posted by Koby View Post
    Maindeck discard is generally worse than either removal or additional disruptive creatures.
    [Disclaimer: I'm in the Maverick section, and the above quote is quite possibly only in reference to maverick, but the general response has to do with GWB colored decks.]

    I think this is a misunderstanding that comes from the GW point of view. I think the issue is that GW can't fit Bob AND removal AND Discard And the GSZ package AND liliana. That's why we have Maverick, Junk, and DGA as different versions.

    Discard is wonderful at the "any type of deck" interaction; allowing you to remove permanents, spells, creatures, you name it; preventing Lily from ever activating or SFM from every generating CA; generating virtual CA for yourself.
    The issue with Discard is that it sucks so bad late game it requires Sylvan Library/SDT, Dark Confidant, Liliana, and possibly other cards so that you can draw enough or filter enough that the impact it has early game outweighs the negative it has on the late game via card draw/filtering mechanics.

    And of course as Koby mentions in the latter of the post; the main issue isn't that Hatebears are better; it's that Thalia is the BOSS hatebear and she doesn't like you having 20-25 non-creature spells in your deck; which is where Junk is at. (~10 removal, 6-7 discard, 2-3 sylvan libraries/sdt, 2-3 equipment, etc..)


    I think the "proper" way to mix Junk/Maverick is something like:

    -16-18-
    4 DRS
    4 Bob
    1 Teeg
    1 Scooze
    0-2 QPM
    2-4 SFM
    3 KotR

    -21-23-
    3-4 GSZ
    2-3 Library
    3-4 Decay
    3-4 Plow
    3 Liliana
    2-3 equips
    5-7 discard

    22(?) lands

    You get a mix of Hatebear (Teeg) with Discard and Liliana to help stabilize. I'll be trying a KotR junk again soon; but in general it feels like you get less value and have color issues with this formation (BB, GB and GW) where as GWb has GW and GB as the only combinations so it's "centered."
    Quote Originally Posted by Nestalim View Post
    Wrong. Gideon Emblem protect you from losing and you can even open your binder and slam some cards on the board, not even the HJ can DQ you now.

  7. #6267

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by tescrin View Post
    1 Siege Rhino <= singleton feels weak IMO. I'd rather have a Walker personally, or a bomb.

    1 Batterskull <= Not as good in this deck as mentioned. Can be used in the side as an anti-Empty The Warrens card.

    -23 Lands- <= This is probably fine with maze, but may be 1 too high.


    Consider some utility lands. I enjoyed Cabal Pit a bit as a way to kill off Mom or similar. Being able to fetch a kill card is nifty. Bog is an alright card as well; but it's obnoxious to start with and is somewhat mediocre.


    An aside; it's only "Dark Maverick" if it has Dark Confidant. It typically looks like a mashup of Maverick and Junk (GSZ package, KotR, Confidant, Discard)
    Thanks for the info.

    Batterskull has been put in sideboard for now but I'm still wondering if I should replace it with light and shadow.

    I put rhino in cause at 4cc he's easy to cast and can be tutored relatively quickly. Also he was my answer to chump blocking (and TNN to some extent).
    Edit: Also, he can be hardcast most games. What other choices do I have? Is Sigarda really that much better?

    I've adjusted the land count to 22 but It could go back to 23 if I exchange rhino for Rogue's passage as mentioned earlier.
    Would that be better than having a trample creature that can be tutored for?
    Last edited by Cpt-Qc; 10-15-2015 at 11:22 PM.

  8. #6268
    The crazy nastyass honey badger

    Join Date

    Dec 2013
    Location

    A desk chair, The Netherlands
    Posts

    1,909

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Well... Sigarda can't be hit by your opponents' spotremoval, eats Delver for breakfast and flies over TNN. But mostly the "can-only-be-answered-by-big-ass-sweepers" bit.

  9. #6269

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by L10 View Post
    I agree with Koby. But if you really want a main deck discard spell to hedge against combo, I'd go with Tidehollow Sculler because he's also a clock. Also, BB can be hard to achieve.
    Quote Originally Posted by Koby View Post
    Maindeck discard is generally worse than either removal or additional disruptive creatures. There's also the dissynergy between Thalia and <spells>. I would recommend Liliana over Hymn or Thoughtseize as hand disruption, but not over more Thalia first.
    thank you guys, I really appreciate it for your opinions
    I'll report to a post after the tournament, giving my feedback and observation about how the deck run exclusively against combo.

  10. #6270
    Is Cancer

    Join Date

    Jul 2014
    Posts

    1,146

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Cpt-Qc View Post
    I've adjusted the land count to 22 but It could go back to 23 if I exchange rhino for Rogue's passage as mentioned earlier.
    Would that be better than having a trample creature that can be tutored for?
    Can't say for sure. If you want an evasive huge-dude; I'd go Sigarda, as much as I'm "meh" on it. If you *just* want evasion, you can go the Scryb Ranger route. Siege Rhino is a fine card it seems, but I feel like it's home is more in Nic Fit where it can be cast several times.

    I often don't have an issue of requiring evasion to connect; either because the Sword I choose has the correct protection, Mom is there, or some other nuance. Another point is that you don't have to hit the player with Jitte, so Jitte tends to be my go to and the evasion matters little; since the CA generated by connecting is enough to seal the deal.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nestalim View Post
    Wrong. Gideon Emblem protect you from losing and you can even open your binder and slam some cards on the board, not even the HJ can DQ you now.

  11. #6271
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    How has Pithing Needle as a sideboard slot been working out for folks? Which matchups do you normally bring in it for?
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  12. #6272
    Member
    bakofried's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2009
    Location

    Bakersfield, Ca
    Posts

    744

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    When I was testing it, I brought Needle in against Miracles. Most of the time I named Top; in corner cases, Jace and E. Explosives. I didn't test against other MU's with Needle in the 76.
    Quote Originally Posted by ktkenshinx View Post
    The Reserved List is a) not legally binding, b) antiquated, c) broken, and d) preventative of maximum game enjoyment. Wizards will remove as many cards from that list as possible to increase the fun of their game. Using market research, they can find a balance between printing enough cards to lower a price from $40 to $15-$20, and not utterly ruining their value. This will be both an economically feasible AND sensible move.
    -ktkenshinx-

  13. #6273
    Salt of the earth

    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Canada
    Posts

    4,685

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    It's an excellent all-star. I like it against Miracles for Top (or Jace), I like it against Sneak for Sneak, Vial, etc.

    -Matt

  14. #6274
    Englishman in New York
    Fl0do's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Location

    Western Austria
    Posts

    39

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I think Needle is great, I'm playing 2 in my SB at the moment.

    I'm boarding it vs:

    Miracles (SDT, Jace)
    Shardless Sultai (Liliana, Jace, sometimes Deathrite)
    Jund (Liliana, sometimes Deathrite)
    Death & Taxes (Vial, Equipment, Mangara, sometimes Mother of Runes)
    Sneak and Show (Griselbrand, Sneak Attack)
    Elves (Wirewood Symbiote, Quirion Ranger, sometimes Deathrite)
    Lands (Thespian's Stage, Rishadan Port, sometimes Wasteland)
    Goblins (Vial, ..)
    Merfolk (Vial, Mutavault)
    Infect (Inkmoth Nexus)
    12-Post (SDT, Expedition Map, ...)
    and probably many more
    //Edit: totally forgot Stoneblade and Painter ^^

    and if I have space I'm boarding it also vs. ANT/TES because naming a fetchland is real and has won me at least one game (depends on what I saw in the first game).
    Formerly known as Bierbaron.

  15. #6275
    Member

    Join Date

    Mar 2010
    Location

    Rochester NY
    Posts

    8

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    So far I've only used Pithing Needle against Plainswalkers, Thespian Stage, and some Fetchlands. Even with only those three targets, it has definitely found a permanent place in my SB.

  16. #6276

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick


  17. #6277
    Cavern on Soldier
    Jon's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2013
    Location

    Woodstock, Georgia, America
    Posts

    226

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by yuMi- View Post
    I dont pay for premium because they are generally wrong. "His list" is probably a list he took off someone else on the internet.
    Soldier Stompy

    Quote Originally Posted by nedleeds View Post
    Isn't the reward for an IQ the right to play standard? I'd rather get rickets.

  18. #6278
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,133

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Jon View Post
    I dont pay for premium because they are generally wrong. "His list" is probably a list he took off someone else on the internet.
    "I decided to cut this [role player] because it doesn't look right. Let's add maximum DRS and SFM and Batterskull instead. New deck: GW Deathblade" - SCG Writer, probably.
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  19. #6279
    Cavern on Soldier
    Jon's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2013
    Location

    Woodstock, Georgia, America
    Posts

    226

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quote Originally Posted by Koby View Post
    "I decided to cut this [role player] because it doesn't look right. Let's add maximum DRS and SFM and Batterskull instead. New deck: GW Deathblade" - SCG Writer, probably.
    "Stoneforge is so powerful, I added it to Miracles and won something because I only know how to fetch batterskull. " - BVMD
    Soldier Stompy

    Quote Originally Posted by nedleeds View Post
    Isn't the reward for an IQ the right to play standard? I'd rather get rickets.

  20. #6280

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Are you guys pros in disguise? you've got great Maverick insight :O

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)