Brainstorm
Force of Will
Lion's Eye Diamond
Counterbalance
Sensei's Divining Top
Tarmogoyf
Phyrexian Dreadnaught
Goblin Lackey
Standstill
Natural Order
Thats not even close to what I had in mind. In Vintage you drop this creature T1 with the help of a Mox and Turn two and ongoing every Fetchland becomes a Black Lotus. So 5 Mana turn 2 in that case. Mind we don't even talk about Gush & Fastbond. Cobra Gush was a thing in Vintage for battling Sphere-effects.
I mean even in Legacy you can do some crazy shit with Lotus Petal or Mox Diamond to drop Cobra and go crazy with 4+ mana turn 2
www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!
Join us at Facebook!
The odd thing about Pauper is that they banned Infect, which is creature combo in a format that has an abundance of viable T1 answers to kill the creature or drain Invigorates so the kill doesn't happen. Storm I can understand, Nighthavk Storm was retarded, but Infect?
Originally Posted by Lemnear
Exactly
Just because there's an abundance of T1 removal, doesn't mean you've to play the gotcha game every game. Infect is clearly a step ahead every other deck in that format.
It's like arguing why flash is banned in legacy since there's force of will.
P.s. that Lotus Cobra art is so sweet! I've been looking for them since their release!
Just couple more hours![]()
One of the "better" ideas of SCV (Snake City Vault) was to go Land, Mox, Lotus Cobra. Next turn, fetch, Jace, the Mind Sculptor with Spell Pierce backup. I bet that is still a pretty decent opening even today.
Indeed. I really hope something comes off the list. I ponied up and bought a playset of Survivals, not because I really think it will come off the list, but it was just about the only thing that could come off the list that I don't own.
"The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
—Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order
WotC have been pushing Legacy online more so than in the past. They might start caring about how much "fun" this format is, or how much money it can make them. Also they might be looking at online data more than paper, which might make a ban more probable.
Sold my Enchantress stuff last year, as I only ever play Lands now. But I'm thinking I miss it and might try to rebuild. So if anything comes off, I hope it's Twist and not Earthcraft yet.
Supremacy 2020 is the modern era game of nuclear brinksmanship! My blog:
https://fieldmarshalshandbook.wordpress.com
You can play Lands.dec in EDH too! My primer:
http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/t...lara-lands-dec
Oh, I know, it's exceedingly unlikely anything changes.
If that is true, that they have taken an interest in Legacy online, than perhaps there is a chance. I wonder if that was what that Legacy Challenge thing was about?
I'm down with either of those, or both.
"The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
—Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order
Supremacy 2020 is the modern era game of nuclear brinksmanship! My blog:
https://fieldmarshalshandbook.wordpress.com
You can play Lands.dec in EDH too! My primer:
http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/t...lara-lands-dec
That's true. Looking at Vintage, they sure haven't made anyone* happy lately with a more heavy-handed approach. Me, on the other hand, I don't really mind switching decks (because my collection is somewhat large), but I am usually playing some BG/X deck in Legacy, and I would have a very hard time seeing them ever ban Decay or Deathrite (in Legacy). If something does get banned from Miracles, there is going to be much gnashing of teeth and pulling of hair.
That's one of the reasons I don't invest too heavily in one deck though, I'd hate to have it banned. There is always that risk though.
*Not literally everyone is upset, but I would venture there is a (relatively) large minority of people upset by the recent restrictions.
"The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
—Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order
That is a really good point. Honestly, Magic players typically don't stick around long enough to appreciate this fact. But as soon as action is taken and the format swerves, a new best deck emerges and players - often the same players - again start to complain.
You can't change human nature, so I really like the idea of a gentle hand guiding rather than the Blizzard approach for exactly the reason Crimhead put forth here.
"Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job."
"Politicians are like diapers. They should be changed often and for the same reason."
"Governing is too important to be left to people as silly as politicians."
"Politicians were mostly people who'd had too little morals and ethics to stay lawyers."
There may always be a best deck, but as long as that deck has a half decent foil that can pin it, rotate the format, thats fine. If you have the best deck being Grixis Delver, then Lands comes along and Stomps it before being slapped down by ANT and Imperial Painter who then get hit by Delver that seems OK.
Whats not ok is when a deck is the objectively best deck for 27 months out of 28.
*crosses fingers*
SDT ban... SDT ban... SDT ban...
For those interested in the latest Ancient decks (and the format in general) visit: http://ancientmtgdecks.blogspot.ca/
No changes, unfortunately.
There are currently 13 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 13 guests)