Page 100 of 147 FirstFirst ... 509096979899100101102103104110 ... LastLast
Results 1,981 to 2,000 of 2929

Thread: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

  1. #1981
    Member
    mcbain's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2014
    Location

    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts

    266

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    .

  2. #1982
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Apr 2014
    Posts

    950

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by mcbain View Post
    By your explanation then, if i stifle the depths, hold priority, and wasteland the depths. When the stfile resolves the ability should not trigger again.

    Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk
    I don't think his post is entirely correct either. He's right about stifling the dark depths trigger in that case it'll just go on the stack again. I don't think he's correct about the other part though, while the dark depths trigger is on the stack if you have some way to destroy the depths then the trigger just can't resolve because there is no depths to sac. Obviously a judge/rules forum question but that is how i've seen it work with all the lands players around me.

    7/15/2006: Dark Depths's last ability is a state trigger. It will not trigger again while the ability is on the stack, but if the ability is countered and Dark Depths is still on the battlefield with no ice counters on it, it will trigger again immediately.

  3. #1983
    Member
    mcbain's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2014
    Location

    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts

    266

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    By your explanation then, if i stifle the depths, hold priority, and wasteland the depths. When the stfile resolves the ability should not trigger again.

    And also,

    Reading the depths combo write up in the lands forum agrees with my explanation. So does the judge explanation....

    The trigger checks twice. One, to triger on the first place and the second on resolution (when its dead from wasteland).

    Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk

  4. #1984

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by mcbain View Post
    The trigger checks twice. One, to triger on the first place and the second on resolution (when its dead from wasteland).
    But then why would you even need to Stifle it in the first place? (That is, why wouldn’t it be enough to simply Wasteland it?)

  5. #1985
    Member
    mcbain's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2014
    Location

    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts

    266

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Confirmed, your wrong.

    If you have wasteland and they combo you will 2:1 them (multiple sources). The only way they can get passed it is a port or waste on your waste prior to the combo.

    As it is a statebased effect if will just retrigger from stifle.



    Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk

  6. #1986
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Apr 2014
    Posts

    950

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by mcbain View Post
    By your explanation then, if i stifle the depths, hold priority, and wasteland the depths. When the stfile resolves the ability should not trigger again.

    And also,

    Reading the depths combo write up in the lands forum agrees with my explanation. So does the judge explanation....

    The trigger checks twice. One, to triger on the first place and the second on resolution (when its dead from wasteland).

    Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk
    I think I may have explained myself poorly. You don't need to stifle at all, you just need some way to destroy the dark depths while the make merit lage trigger is on the stack. Stifling does nothing in this situation unless you are trying to stifle the thespian stage copy effect.

  7. #1987
    Hey guys, let's do it! The blue yonder awaits! Yahoo!
    Chatto's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2011
    Location

    The World
    Posts

    1,011

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by now View Post
    But then why would you even need to Stifle it in the first place? (That is, why wouldn’t it be enough to simply Wasteland it?)
    Stifle won't make a difference, so don't bother. Also, RGCL will never combo without Wasteland or Port when an opponent has Wasteland open.

    Question: do you guys have a lot of RGCL-hate? Winter Orb is a pain in the ass, obviously, but real dedicated hate? Or do you guys play the tempo-game? (Which by the way can be enough)
    "Be it ever so crumbled, there's no place like home."

    RGCL (GQ)


    Quote Originally Posted by Dice_Box View Post
    Welcome aboard, in her dark name we do dedicate this performance.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_Mcdonalds View Post
    That actually sounds erotic.
    Youtube-playlist dedicated to RGCL

  8. #1988
    Member
    mcbain's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2014
    Location

    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts

    266

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Stifle was not the main point of discussion. It was mainly the clarification on when to wasteland your opponent during the combo.

    The correct answer is to wait until the legend rule has happened then kill the other remaining land with the trigger on the stack.

    As for fighting lands its not that great of a MU and generally revolves around loam, mainly it not resolving.

    Bash with goose and watch your opponent stare at thier hand of mazes and punishing fires.

    Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk

  9. #1989
    Hey guys, let's do it! The blue yonder awaits! Yahoo!
    Chatto's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2011
    Location

    The World
    Posts

    1,011

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by mcbain View Post
    Stifle was not the main point of discussion. It was mainly the clarification on when to wasteland your opponent during the combo.

    The correct answer is to wait until the legend rule has happened then kill the other remaining land with the trigger on the stack.

    As for fighting lands its not that great of a MU and generally revolves around loam, mainly it not resolving.

    Bash with goose and watch your opponent stare at thier hand of mazes and punishing fires.

    Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk
    My bad, just dropped in, didn't read the whole discussion. Anyway, like I said: I'll never combo without my own Wasteland, when facing a Wasteland.

    Don't forget the mana-denial plan (Tabernacle, Wasteland, the occasionsl Ghost Quarter, and Rishadan Port), though bashing with Goose sounds like a solid plan
    "Be it ever so crumbled, there's no place like home."

    RGCL (GQ)


    Quote Originally Posted by Dice_Box View Post
    Welcome aboard, in her dark name we do dedicate this performance.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_Mcdonalds View Post
    That actually sounds erotic.
    Youtube-playlist dedicated to RGCL

  10. #1990

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by mcbain View Post
    Stifle was not the main point of discussion. It was mainly the clarification on when to wasteland your opponent during the combo.

    The correct answer is to wait until the legend rule has happened then kill the other remaining land with the trigger on the stack.

    As for fighting lands its not that great of a MU and generally revolves around loam, mainly it not resolving.

    Bash with goose and watch your opponent stare at thier hand of mazes and punishing fires.

    Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk
    Yeah my bad. The stifle part I described is right, but my wasteland was wrong.

    Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  11. #1991

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    How do you make the sideboard agains miracles?

    Which cards you normally take off?

  12. #1992
    Member
    KobeBryan's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2011
    Location

    Arcadia, CA
    Posts

    2,232

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by Tiago View Post
    How do you make the sideboard agains miracles?

    Which cards you normally take off?
    dazes and wasteland...thats 5 cards

    1 sulfuric
    2 pyroblast
    1 sulfer elemental/library
    1 clique

  13. #1993

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by Tiago View Post
    How do you make the sideboard agains miracles?

    Which cards you normally take off?
    +2 orb
    +2 reb
    +1 invasive surgery
    +1 null Rod
    +1 fluster
    -2 dismember
    -3 goyf (i only play 3 and 1 snapcaster / vendilion/ izzet charm )
    -2 bolts

    Love this boarding but you need the orbs otherwise you board like kobebryan said.

  14. #1994

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by Tiago View Post
    How do you make the sideboard agains miracles?

    Which cards you normally take off?
    My go to board is something like this
    OTP:
    -4 wasteland
    2 dismember
    4 bolt/daze (depends how they play, how many mentors they have, etc)

    +2 Pyro
    2 fluster
    1 sylvan
    1 vortex
    1 surgical
    1 null rod
    1 sulfur elemental
    1 vendilion clique

    OTD
    -4 wasteland
    2 dismember
    4 daze

    +2 Pyro
    2 fluster
    1 sylvan
    1 vortex
    1 surgical
    1 null rod
    1 sulfur elemental
    1 vendilion clique

    Orb is really good too if you have it.

    Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  15. #1995
    Member

    Join Date

    Mar 2014
    Location

    Tennessee
    Posts

    20

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    I think sb winter orb is almost mandatory at this point. The miracles matchup is like night and day depending on if you stick an orb or not. I've won games on turn 10+ just because of winter orbs and cantrips finding replicable armies of mongooses.

  16. #1996

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Good morning fellows!

    Great news, I played a 26 players tournment yesterday with canadian and I got 2nd place. 5v-1l.

    I'll write some considerations after the list appears in tcdecks.

    Bye
    2x0 TES
    2x1 Omni-Sneak
    2x1 Eldrazi
    0x2 Deadguy Ale (BWg Blade)
    2x0 RUG Delver


    Deadguy Ale won the tournment.

    =D


    My last 4 legacy tournments:

    Canadian - 5V-2L - 5th
    Grixis - 3V-1D-2L - 8th
    Canadian - 5V-1L - 1th
    Canadian - 5V-1L - 2th

  17. #1997

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Very nice, congrats! I wish there were more Legacy tournaments in my area, but they are few and far between, unfortunately. I've 4-1'd the last two online Leagues i played in, though, with 2 Git Prbes, 2 Tarfire, and 2 Spell Snares in the flex spots. As opposed to killing 5/5's with Dismember, i just want to get Goyf big and the extra burn has been good for DRS's and overall reach. Pierce always felt like the weakest card in the deck, i've been happy with Snares.

    http://deckstats.net/decks/56084/451448-rug-delver

  18. #1998

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by LewisCBR View Post
    Very nice, congrats! I wish there were more Legacy tournaments in my area, but they are few and far between, unfortunately. I've 4-1'd the last two online Leagues i played in, though, with 2 Git Prbes, 2 Tarfire, and 2 Spell Snares in the flex spots. As opposed to killing 5/5's with Dismember, i just want to get Goyf big and the extra burn has been good for DRS's and overall reach. Pierce always felt like the weakest card in the deck, i've been happy with Snares.

    http://deckstats.net/decks/56084/451448-rug-delver
    Hmmmm, very interesting using 2 tarfire to increase Tarmogoyf... I don't like probe and snare, I used once and it was terrible, i guess I did 2-5 in a tournment..

    You can check the list I used yesterday here> http://www.ligamagic.com.br/?view=decks/view&id=403848

    No big secret, is a generic list, but this main deck is really strong. I repeated this main in last 3 tournments.

  19. #1999

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Does anyone feel like this deck is never a good deck to main constantly at your LGS? I've always found that I can do well at large events locally and even better abroad when people don't know what I'm on. Then when I play weekly 4 round events I average probably 2/2 - 3/1. I'm just curious if anyone else also feels that this deck is at a huge disadvantage when people know you're on it vs when they're blind.

    Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

  20. #2000

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by Contract Killer View Post
    Does anyone feel like this deck is never a good deck to main constantly at your LGS? I've always found that I can do well at large events locally and even better abroad when people don't know what I'm on. Then when I play weekly 4 round events I average probably 2/2 - 3/1. I'm just curious if anyone else also feels that this deck is at a huge disadvantage when people know you're on it vs when they're blind.

    Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
    Absolutely. The Wasteland-Stifle-Daze plan is obviously much stronger game 1 if your opponent does not know what deck you're playing. Then again, similar arguments can be made for most decks, I guess.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)