View Poll Results: Do you enjoy Legacy right now

Voters
190. You may not vote on this poll
  • Itīs Great

    61 32.11%
  • itīs okay

    84 44.21%
  • Not really

    45 23.68%
Page 2 of 15 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 283

Thread: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

  1. #21
    Member
    from Cairo's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    RI
    Posts

    1,093

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    I picked "it's ok"

    I don't feel that excited about Legacy at the moment. Feels like "tiers" are sort of established, there's still room for 20ish random decks to spike an event. Nothing has really shaken things up like the Delve cards did. I imagine Fatal Push will put up some results and the recent-ish printings of Leovold, Recruiter/Prelate, Nissa (and probably a few others I'm not thinking of) have boosted some established decks. I'm happy enough playing in this metagame, but would not be opposed to seeing some shake ups.
    TPDMC

  2. #22
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts

    1,658

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    Quote Originally Posted by twndomn View Post
    OP should clarify the context. What kind of state, the financial state or the meta-game state? I would imagine OP's referring to the meta, not the reserved-list availability aspect of Legacy.
    While I get what you're saying, those two factors are inextricably linked.

    Quote Originally Posted by from Cairo View Post
    I picked "it's ok"

    I don't feel that excited about Legacy at the moment. Feels like "tiers" are sort of established, there's still room for 20ish random decks to spike an event. Nothing has really shaken things up like the Delve cards did. I imagine Fatal Push will put up some results and the recent-ish printings of Leovold, Recruiter/Prelate, Nissa (and probably a few others I'm not thinking of) have boosted some established decks. I'm happy enough playing in this metagame, but would not be opposed to seeing some shake ups.
    I basically share this feeling. I'd be up for just about any nonland card getting banned or unbanned just to shake the meta up, but I have a lot of advantages over other players that allow me to change decks easily if something happens to one that I like.

  3. #23
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    Quote Originally Posted by JBlaze View Post
    The Treasure Cruise/Dig Through Time era had a streamlining effect on the format in that it made people realize how powerful the consistency of the blue cantrip shell really was.
    I agree with this. The delve cards were when I started disliking the format for this exact reason. It homogenized decks far too much.
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    I've been taking shitty brews and tier 2 decks to tournaments and losing with them for years now. Welcome to the club. We meet for cocktails after round 6.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevestamopz View Post
    Top quality german restraint there.

    If I'm at the point where I'm rage quitting, you can bet your kransky that I'm calling everyone involved a cunt.

  4. #24

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    It feels stale to me. Ok, but stale. The "new" Leovold deck doesn't really seem that different, despite using 2 of a new card.

    I was watching Romariovidal on twitch last night, having a hilarious time playing Legacy Birds (this list). A friend on the stream mentioned how inbred the meta seems, and legacy in general. This deck with crappy removal, anthems, and tokens, seemed like a breath of fresh air and I stayed up for multiple hours despite tiredness and a headache because of how great it was. Even went 6-1 in league matches with it before he called it a night.

  5. #25
    Member

    Join Date

    Jul 2013
    Location

    Texas
    Posts

    1,184

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    I wish there was an "it's complicated" option. I'd rather play Legacy than any other format or no magic at all, and I value getting a midweek reprieve from work and stuff more than I really care about winning.

    But there really is nothing like playing at big, competitive tournaments, and for Legacy right now it just seems like your legitimate options for doing well at one are very narrow.

    I agree with much of what's been said in this thread. This format desperately needs a major banned list update, multiple cards going on and off. Deckbuilding is too on rails at the moment and I think that's what's bothering people the most.

  6. #26
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    I also picked "It's ok".

    The period between 2009-2012 was my favorite because things were pretty constantly changing, and a very wide range of fair decks were possible (even outside of the "blue shell"). Since 2013, the developments have been relatively few and far between. We had the delve era and the onset of eldrazi, a couple new combo decks popped up, but mostly the same cast.

  7. #27
    Site Contributor
    Stuart's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2015
    Location

    Austin TX
    Posts

    516

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    Quote Originally Posted by maharis View Post
    I wish there was an "it's complicated" option. I'd rather play Legacy than any other format or no magic at all, and I value getting a midweek reprieve from work and stuff more than I really care about winning.

    But there really is nothing like playing at big, competitive tournaments, and for Legacy right now it just seems like your legitimate options for doing well at one are very narrow.

    I agree with much of what's been said in this thread. This format desperately needs a major banned list update, multiple cards going on and off. Deckbuilding is too on rails at the moment and I think that's what's bothering people the most.
    This sums up my feelings completely. I'm always happy to go play Thursday night Legacy, and prefer it to every other format, but I'd like to see some shakeups via bannings, unbannings, and new printings (as long as those printings aren't more prisony creatures like Sanctum Prelate or Leovold).

  8. #28
    我不是你的英雄。
    Jonathan Alexander's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    854

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    Feel free to yell at me for this, but if you dislike creature power creep and miss diversity and brews, you should try out Pauper. It has many of the things people seem to look for in Legacy plus it doesn't have that stupid 1k USD pricetag for every deck.
    Don't mind me, i'm just writing about Pauper these days: theweeklywars.wordpress.com

    deckstats.net archive

  9. #29

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    Survival of the Fittest banned while Show and Tell is not just force me to say "it's okay". I think Survival was the favourite deck for many people and banning non-blue power cards is just plain stupid while keeping blue unharmed.

  10. #30
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Jul 2011
    Location

    Maastricht, NL
    Posts

    2,539

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    I voted "It's okay". It's still the coolest format, but they did their sweet best to cock it up. I mean: printing Emrakul, Delver, Treasure Cruise and Griselbrand... Really? It didn't take a genius to see that those were going to be a problem. And just when they printed a solution for a format that was getting too fast and overpowered, they banned it because eveybody was playing it. Yeah, what did you expect? The card didn't cost mana to cast, so everybody actually could play it. Their second reason was even worse: there were even more decks playing blue than before the printing of Misstep. But they never gave the format time to adapt to that fact. Besides, they of course completely ignored the fact that Delver was a much bigger reason for the abundance of blue in that time.

    After the Alara block, only one good thing happened in Legacy: the printing of Liliana of the Veil. Everything else just made things worse.

  11. #31
    Member
    Spam's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2014
    Location

    Italy
    Posts

    200

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    The format it's quite enjoyable at the moment. You have a good amount of choice between decks and the games are quite fun. Sure, you might smash into a T1 kill or a chalice, but it's part of the game. To be fair, I'm enjoying it that much that I've finally dumped my modern deck forever.

    Enviado desde mi Moto G (4) mediante Tapatalk
    Quote Originally Posted by clavio View Post
    Brainstorm is easy to play

  12. #32
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Germany, RLP, KO
    Posts

    444

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    I feel like Legacy has become less interactive and therefore less fun.

    Nowadays there are so many strategies, which are hard to stop or at least to interact with or just have the "I win"-button.

    Turn 2: Show and Tell, Emrakul
    Recurring Thespian's Stage + Dark Depths
    Turn 1: Reanimate, Griselbrand
    Dredge
    Elves Combo

    There are still the slower fair/good stuff decks, but I feel their number has decreased.

    I miss the days when Survival was still legal.... Goblins, Landstill, High Tide, Survival, Threshold, Zoo. When you played
    decks which actually led you play the game at least for a few turns (except Belcher) and relatively slowly advanced to the win, instead of winning in one attack phase with Emrakul or Marit Lage in the early turns.

  13. #33
    Land Destruction Enthusiast
    Megadeus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2012
    Location

    Kennesaw, GA
    Posts

    5,572

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    Quote Originally Posted by Asthereal View Post
    I voted "It's okay". It's still the coolest format, but they did their sweet best to cock it up. I mean: printing Emrakul, Delver, Treasure Cruise and Griselbrand... Really? It didn't take a genius to see that those were going to be a problem. And just when they printed a solution for a format that was getting too fast and overpowered, they banned it because eveybody was playing it. Yeah, what did you expect? The card didn't cost mana to cast, so everybody actually could play it. Their second reason was even worse: there were even more decks playing blue than before the printing of Misstep. But they never gave the format time to adapt to that fact. Besides, they of course completely ignored the fact that Delver was a much bigger reason for the abundance of blue in that time.

    After the Alara block, only one good thing happened in Legacy: the printing of Liliana of the Veil. Everything else just made things worse.
    I never played legacy with misstep, but I've played it in vintage. It's fucking miserable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Cheese View Post
    I've been taking shitty brews and tier 2 decks to tournaments and losing with them for years now. Welcome to the club. We meet for cocktails after round 6.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevestamopz View Post
    Top quality german restraint there.

    If I'm at the point where I'm rage quitting, you can bet your kransky that I'm calling everyone involved a cunt.

  14. #34
    Greatness awaits!
    Lemnear's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2010
    Location

    Berlin, Germany
    Posts

    6,997

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    The format is going downhill since Innistrad.

    Just look what happened there and afterwards: Delver, DRS, Terminus, Entreat, TNN, Griselbrand, Treasure Cruise, Dig Through Time, Decay, Eldrazi, snapcaster mage, etc.
    www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!

    Join us at Facebook!

    Quote Originally Posted by Echelon View Post
    Lemnear sounds harsh at times, but he means well. Or to destroy, but that's when he starts rapping.

    Architect by day, rapstar by night. He's pretty much the German Hannah Montana. Sometimes he even comes in like a wrecking ball.

  15. #35
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Germany, RLP, KO
    Posts

    444

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemnear View Post
    The format is going downhill since Innistrad.

    Just look what happened there and afterwards: Delver, DRS, Terminus, Entreat, TNN, Griselbrand, Treasure Cruise, Dig Through Time, Decay, Eldrazi, snapcaster mage, etc.
    QFT!

    Or let's just start one set before, New Phyrexia. Phyrexian Mana was a mistake as well.

  16. #36
    Global Moderator
    mistercakes's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2009
    Location

    Copenhagen
    Posts

    2,278

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    i listed that the format is great. there's still a variety of decks to play and each time i go to a tournament, i am still surprised at the diversity in my matchups. counterbalance/abrupt decay is generally a problem for me, but other than that i'm quite happy with the format.

    i'm also glad that there are other ways to deal with these cards/decks! i'm not a delver, miracles, s&t or eldrazi player out of spite.

    i think just the fact that there are this many decks that you can show up with is great, even if many of them are blue based. i've played in many tournaments and there are many times where i dodge a lot of the mainstream decks and play vs tier 2 decks all day long.

    i'm guessing this depends on how spikey your local meta is. i can see having a different opinion if i showed up each week and there were 3 miracles players out of 8.
    -rob

  17. #37
    It's not easy being green

    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Posts

    1,635

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Alexander View Post
    Feel free to yell at me for this, but if you dislike creature power creep and miss diversity and brews, you should try out Pauper. It has many of the things people seem to look for in Legacy plus it doesn't have that stupid 1k USD pricetag for every deck.
    Been playing Pauper a lot lately and it's fun as hell. The only thing I miss is being able to play an actually good combo deck since they all seem to accrue insane amounts of whining and get banned.

    But apart from that, it's really fun. There's no cantrip cartel, you actually get to play. The format's a ton about eking out value, playing interactive magic without humongous haymakers or Planeswalkers and coming out ahead. Plus how can I lie, Capsize-locking people after drowning them in hardcast Mulldrifters is as fun as it is evil.

    Seriously. It's a format where Mulldrifter is the best card that's gotten away with murder and is somehow still legal. That can't be an entirely bad thing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Asthereal View Post
    After the Alara block, only one good thing happened in Legacy: the printing of Liliana of the Veil. Everything else just made things worse.
    As an Elves player, I liked the printing of Deathrite and Decay.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lemnear
    (On Innistrad)
    Yeah, an insanely powerful block which put the "derp!" factor in Legacy completely over the top.

  18. #38

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    Quote Originally Posted by Megadeus View Post
    I would be interested to see what people see in this meta that we currently have that makes it so great to them.
    First off, I was not a big fan of the Thresh, Maverick, Stoneblade era. The meta was too heavy with fair decks; and too many of those decks were just good-stuff.

    I like Legacy now because it feels more diverse (to me). Looking at our DTB, we have:
    • One fast combo deck
    • One classic "hard control" deck
    • One midrange value deck
    • One big-mana stompy deck
    • One aggressive tempo deck
    • One weenie-prison deck.
    We have six decks with radically different play-styles, each one running a distintive set of threats and answers. Looking back, it's hard to find another time when the top decks were this different in terms of play-styles, threats, and answers.

    Even looking to the next tier, the second best decks include UB Reanimator, Sneak Show, Pyromancer, Lands, Elves, Aggro Loam, Burn, and maybe a couple others? These decks add a lot of variety too.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord_Mcdonalds View Post
    The format is fine, the problem is, there aren't many new things happening. Sure, someone may have some spicy brew, but it's almost assuredly something that has been done before and is simply being revisited. Everything has been done and wizards isn't printing cards that are both good enough and interesting enough to better the format.

    Eldrazi was the most "different" thing to happen but it isn't exactly attacking the format in a way that hasn't been done before (or at least, in a dramatically new fashion)
    I have to disagree. Eldrazi is quite a bit different than MUD; but more importantly the meta now has a tier one Stompy deck, which is quite a big difference.

    Then there is the new Reanimator shell. Two new tier-one decks in a single year seems like a lot to me.

    Quote Originally Posted by janchu88 View Post
    and here just my 2 cents on the topic:
    In my specific case i think it began with the Eldrazi entering the arena, with tons of chalice decks, Loam-lock decks, Miracles still at the top and so on i think the Meta got "controllier" than before and lots of the more dynamic decks disappered. Its not as if i wasnt able to beat those strategies, but many of the currently well doing decks feel to me as if if they were just trying to slam as many lock pieces as possible and hope that they eventually will get there. The latest episode in the game of hatebears was adding Leovold to BUG... and this is the only thing that really changed over the course of recent legacy history, hatebears and stompy decks were added, thats it
    Funny, but I feel the opposite! If anything, the control decks are more aggressive now than in the earlier days.

    Used to be decks like Enchantress, Pox, or Geddon Stax were a lot more competitive. But those creature decks keep getting better and better, while pure prison is left in their dust! Nowadays the best "prison" decks need to be loaded with speedy threats (D&T or Eldrazi), or include a fast combo which can end a game out of nowhere (Lands).

    That said the format is still incredibly fun and diverse - at least from the perspective of a Lands player where I find great strategic variety from one match to the next. Also I play a lot of RUG Lands - and while it doesn't put up significant numbers I find the deck powerful, well positioned, and (for the most part) a hard-control prison deck.
    Supremacy 2020 is the modern era game of nuclear brinksmanship! My blog:
    https://fieldmarshalshandbook.wordpress.com

    You can play Lands.dec in EDH too! My primer:
    http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/t...lara-lands-dec

  19. #39
    Foreign Black Border
    Lord_Mcdonalds's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2012
    Location

    Houston, Texas
    Posts

    753

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    Quote Originally Posted by Crimhead View Post

    I have to disagree. Eldrazi is quite a bit different than MUD; but more importantly the meta now has a tier one Stompy deck, which is quite a big difference.

    Then there is the new Reanimator shell. Two new tier-one decks in a single year seems like a lot to me.
    Eh, both can be boiled down to "play lock piece, beat face", and while MUD can go for a more prison oriented game, they play out similarly.

    Aggressive Griselbrand with disruption, I've seen that a couple of times.

    Do agree people are looking at 2012 with rose colored glasses, remember RUG playing Counterbalance as the sideboard plan for the mirror?
    Quote Originally Posted by iatee View Post
    I still have a strong suspicion that if 'Thalia, Heretic Cathar' had been named 'Frank, Heretic Cathar', people would be a lot more skeptical of it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Goin Aggro View Post
    Ugh, there he goes again, talking about the girlfriend. We get it dude.

  20. #40
    Some dipshit of a Moderator.
    Dice_Box's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2013
    Location

    A Tabernacle in some random Valley.
    Posts

    4,843

    Re: Do you enjoy the current state of legacy?

    Legacy today is very Xerox like in nature. I expect to see the same thing happening from the same cards who have all taken up a larger and larger meta share. Am I looking at the past with Sunglasses of Urza? No, I don't feel like I am.
    It is better to ask and look stupid then keep your mouth shut and remain so.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spam View Post
    Do not make fun of lands masters, they've spent many years mastering the punishing fire technique in the secret loam monastery. Do not mistake them with the miracles masters, eternal rivals, they won't like it.
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    I hope your afterlife is filled with eternal torment.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dice_Box View Post
    Fuck. Which one of my quotes do I drop for this?
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    Something about how fun it is pulling the wings off flies and microwaving the neighbors cat?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)