Quote Originally Posted by Nidd View Post
I was refering to this part of your post:

You are speaking of an aggressive rush, but you don't specify which deck you mean. When speaking of "aggressive decks", I don't think many think of Counterbalance. Zoo, Goblins and GoyfSligh would come to mind. And playing Bob against these 3 decks seems to be a bad plan, regarding the fact that they deal a lot of damage and that Bob can get a real liability. If you have a SDT in play, then it of course looks different, but I suppose dropping both SDT and Bob happens far less than Zoo playing an aggressive game.
He OBVIOUSLY meant "aggressive rushes" by the decks that you side Bob in against. Like Landstill suddenly attacking you with Clique and Factory or Countertop having an aggressive draw. And you obviously do not board Confidant against Zoo, Goblins or Goyf Sligh so why would he mean those decks.

However, since everybody in this thread is so sure that all changes Saito made to the deck are bad and that his testing with these changes and his tournament victory were just a fluke or a statistic variance I won't bother explaining it. I am sick of out of context quoting and purposeful misunderstandings like the one above, I am out of this thread.