You shouldn't judge numbers on a list until you have played the deck extensively. Oftentimes, there is intricacies in 2-ofs and 1-ofs that aren't really visible unless you have played with the deck. I hate to reference that ......UW Tempo deck, but the 1-of Knight of the White Orchid is a good example. I don't think you can say that is a spoken rule, particularly in legacy, where games can get pretty swingy pretty fast.
Please do not quote deckcheck as a database of all legacy tournaments. It is good for referencing some lists, but it does not have all the events, and puts on a lot of really small ones nobody cares about as well. If you really want to win a debate through this method, you should look towards the t8s of large tournaments like SGCs and such, of which both these decks have little (or no?) placings, probably because of a combination of difficulty to adapt to and because the decks aren't very strong in the current metagame or in general because of the splashability of legacy, as 4eak mentioned.
A single card that does all that? What the hell does that mean? Well fuck it, it is clearly the superior draw engine anyways.
Except that top is pretty awesome by itself. And promise of power costs 5 mana, you are calling that reliable?
Ok. Innocent blood and chainer's edict are DEFINITELY not better than swords. I was reading your opinions and rationalizing them in my head, but this makes you lose a lot of credibility. White has better removal than black, because STP is a single card that "does all that"
What might those be?
When did cabal coffers become playable again in legacy?
In my opinion, you should just stay away from mono-colored control decks. They are all pretty bad right now. ...Or try a different format.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)