[Article]Eternal Europe: Khan's Dangerous Cards

[Bed Decks Palyer]

I have never actually heard anyone refer to the color combinations as Dega in real life (or any of the other Apoc names for that matter). I am pretty sure using the Apoc names is just something people started to say on the internet in an attempt to establish hipster cred.

+1 on never hearing that; and all that it takes to be sure on the bolded part is to check which users use that.

It's dumb that everyone is in here complaining about the name of the archetypes rather than the actual discussion points of the article. One can figure out what archetype he's talking about from the context clues alone...

I'm not going to figure anything. There are used names and shortcuts, I don't know why should I dick around a 256-cards spoiler to know what the article about Dega Through Time and Treaseru cruiser brings on the RUG Dlver. No way. I wouldn't start naming the established Legacy decks after random crap rare creatures that stink in my binder, coz you know, it's pretty ignorant towards the reader. One should do everything possible for the readers' convenience, and here we got an example of how it wasn't done because reasons. Yeah, it's not that bad as reading That Czech MtG Server where half of the people cannot write correctly so their sentecnes don't make any sense at all, but I still find it annoying and I'm not going to play by this rules. If it's "either subdue to our quirk or don't continue reading", then I got no trouble to click that little cross in the upper right.

Ib4 Fungal Shambler Delver. Go figure.


edit:

IDK just seems pathetic to get wrapped up in whether one calls BUG - BUG, Ana or Sultai, I can't see caring.

Perfect. Then lets don't care and call the thing BUG.