Quote Originally Posted by Sloshthedark View Post
I have hard time believing this, in fact it's impossible imo, how many goldfishes+list please? If it's true, I'll play it in a heartbeat

I have my 2 Pif, 2Toa, GT on
7,84% 7,84%
28,76% 36,60%
36,60% 73,20%
15,03% 88,24%
11,76% 100,00%

T1-5 %, cumulative
avg. 2,941

by T4 2,667 11,76% fail


TES in current list on

13,33% 13,33%
32,00% 45,33%
24,67% 70,00%
12,67% 82,67%
17,33% 100,00%

T1-5 %, cumulative

avg. 2,887

by T4 2,444 17,33% fail


150 goldfishes both, very agressive, mull < 5% - every hand with a land/reasonable nolander played, EtW beating T2 SFM and every AdN cast = kill
It was a typo, meant to say not by t4 (I count fizzles from t5 on), but it wasn't very far from the truth anyways, although my last set I added a bunch of t3's so the speed a dropped a little. I play out Ad Nauseams since ANT isn't the best there, no EtW in the list. This is still fast, and probably explained by the fact that half of them were on the draw, although there was surprisingly little difference between the play and draw (still 1-17-17-3-2 on the play, but had more of the mulls on the draw), being able to play 2-3 lands and 1-3 cantrips is what mattered more than an extra card.

Goldfishes: 80
Turn-1: 3 - 3.75% - 3.75%
Turn-2: 32 - 40% - 43.75%
Turn-3: 33 - 41.25% - 85%
Turn-4: 5 - 6.25% - 91.25%
Turn-5/Fizzle: 7 - 8.75% - 100%
Mull%: 20%
Mull5%: 2.5%

List is the 55 basic cards with 4 preordain and ad nauseam (so 6 discard, no empty, no grim, no top, 15 lands).