Page 59 of 113 FirstFirst ... 94955565758596061626369109 ... LastLast
Results 1,161 to 1,180 of 2259

Thread: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

  1. #1161
    ლ(ಠ_ಠლ)
    4eak's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2007
    Posts

    1,314

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    @ Misplayer

    I haven't been arguing about specific decks in your or my meta. This is about the average.

    The Dreadstill I'm referring to is the Ugr build, where the only non-blue cards maindeck are Goyf and EE. This deck is also a control deck that can go "oops I win" with Stifle-Nought and can also go Aggro with an early Goyf or two.
    Average Dreadstill Manabase:

    3.96- Island

    3.04- Flooded Strand
    2.80 - Polluted Delta
    (Only 3.96 fetches maximum can be used for Islands, assuming you drew no Islands, leaving 1.88 for Duals)

    3.78 - Mishra's Factory
    2.99 - Wasteland
    1.13 - Volcanic Island
    1.50 - Tropical Island

    Well over half the mana-base gets rocked by B2B. B2B is a strong tempo play against Dreadstill. Does that mean you will win because of B2B? No. But, it is certainly devastating enough to buy time for MUC to generate massive card advantage under the asymmetry of B2B's effect.

    B2B forces Dreadstill into a bottleneck, and it weakens several cards and synergies in the process, including the sideboard.

    Countertop is devastating. And, one of MUC's best shots at winning is by using B2B. B2B cuts off the value of Countertop and Standstill, while enabling MUC to more than double the amount of mana that would be available to the Dreadstill player at any point in the game.

    Mana resources win counterwars. Mana resources let you chain bomb. Mana advantage is the catalyst to the snowball of card advantage that the control player seeks.

    I completely agree, but in order for Islandwalk to be relevant in this situation, they need to resolve 2 Lords of Atlantis.
    Not true.

    Lord of Atlantis
    Creature - Merfolk 2/2, UU (2)
    Other Merfolk creatures get +1/+1 and have islandwalk.

    Without a sweeper, you are screwed if LoA hits play. Period.

    With countermagic and Vial, they have good odds of resolving/abusing it.


    @ Pelikanudo

    Vs Loam : -4 B2B -4 F.Spike - 3 Kira : +4Powder K, +4Relic + 3Vendilion
    Averages from 225 Loam decks:

    3.06222222222 - Forgotten Cave
    3.10222222222 - Taiga
    2.73777777778 - Tranquil Thicket
    3.60888888889 - Wasteland
    1.02666666667 - Badlands
    0.951111111111 - Bayou
    0.697777777778 - Volrath's Stronghold
    1.95111111111 - Bloodstained Mire
    3.54666666667 - Wooded Foothills
    0.524444444444 - Windswept Heath

    1.36888888889 - Forest
    1.0 - Mountain
    3.87555555556 - Mox Diamond

    You take out B2B against that?






    peace,
    4eak

  2. #1162
    A Dedicated Storm Player...
    Pelikanudo's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2008
    Location

    Universe > Laniakea > Virgo Supercluster > Milky Way Galaxy > Solar System > Earth By the moment...
    Posts

    595

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    I've been trying loam match ups and taking out B2B becuase trying this change I go on winning,
    The choice is that I have to side in 11 cards
    which cards will you take out ?

  3. #1163
    ლ(ಠ_ಠლ)
    4eak's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2007
    Posts

    1,314

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    @ Pelikanudo

    I'm not advocating your list. But, if I was playing it, I'd board like this:

    -3 Kira, Great Glass-Spinner
    -1 Call the Skybreaker
    -4 Force Spike
    -1 Meloku

    +4 Powder keg
    +4 Relic
    +1 Clique

    CtS + Relic is not a combo.





    peace,
    4eak

  4. #1164
    Punter
    Misplayer's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2008
    Location

    Worcester, MA
    Posts

    227

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    4eak,
    I think we'll have to agree to disagree about B2B in certain Dreadstill/NLU matchups. I was way off on Lord of Atlantis, maybe I just wanted it to say "you control" so that's what I assumed it said. In light of this, I agree with your analysis: the matchup is pretty brutal.

  5. #1165
    Fart Confidant
    idraleo's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2008
    Posts

    341

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    The only way to handle Merfolk if you don' t wanna to get the splash is a 2-3x of Llawan, Cephalid Empress in your sideboard. As Llawan hits the board, your opponent normally shuffle up his library and ask you to play the third game...
    3p1c h0rs3!!

  6. #1166
    Order of the Ebon Hand gets there...pro Swords...take 2...
    Jason's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2008
    Location

    Iowa
    Posts

    249

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    Quote Originally Posted by 4eak View Post
    Averages from 225 Loam decks:

    3.06222222222 - Forgotten Cave
    3.10222222222 - Taiga
    2.73777777778 - Tranquil Thicket
    3.60888888889 - Wasteland
    1.02666666667 - Badlands
    0.951111111111 - Bayou
    0.697777777778 - Volrath's Stronghold
    1.95111111111 - Bloodstained Mire
    3.54666666667 - Wooded Foothills
    0.524444444444 - Windswept Heath

    1.36888888889 - Forest
    1.0 - Mountain
    3.87555555556 - Mox Diamond

    You take out B2B against that?
    Agreed. The reason I win against Loam is because of Back to Basics. It absolutely destroys them. It's much worse than Magus of the Moon. You cannot take them out.

    Depending on the build of the deck, I would probably side as follows:
    +4 Relic
    +3 Powder Keg
    +3 Blue Elemental Blast
    -3 Kira
    -1 Call the Skybreaker
    -4 Force Spike
    -2 Vedalken Shackles

    Obviously, if the build ran more creatures, I would probably leave the Shackles in, but I have seen some with no more than 4x Tarmogoyf and 2x Countryside Crusher (which is really hard to steal with Shackles)
    End of turn...Morphling

    Quote Originally Posted by AriLax View Post
    Brainstorm is only useful in certain situations? Brainstorm is useful when you hand is not the stone cold nutter butter blade Ranchington Q. Farnsworth Esquire best. When Brainstorm is "dead", the game is already over.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ectoplasm View Post
    I heard Bryant Cook once set fire to his opponent's face for playing a Rule of Law.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    It's impressive the amount of effort you put into telling a story that actually makes you look much worse than the idiot.
    Team OMRIAIGTWYFEWARTCAE

  7. #1167
    Member

    Join Date

    Oct 2008
    Posts

    47

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    Against Merfolk, can't we use Snow-Covered Islands? Or am I missing something here?

  8. #1168
    Whatever

    Join Date

    Mar 2006
    Location

    L'Aquila, Italy
    Posts

    496

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    Quote Originally Posted by Glorfindel View Post
    Against Merfolk, can't we use Snow-Covered Islands? Or am I missing something here?
    Snow covered or not, islandwalk works anyway.
    Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity - Seneca, Roman dramatist

  9. #1169
    Member

    Join Date

    Oct 2008
    Posts

    47

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    Oh, duh, my bad. I should RTFC(omprehensive)R(ules).
    I was confused by some cards like Rime Dryad which have snow-covered forestwalk (which obviously doesn't work on normal forests).

  10. #1170

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    I think that MUC, in a combo-metagame like this, must run X copies of Vendilion Clique, that resolves so many matchs (ANT, Enchantress, TES), but, first, must have almost 3-4 copy of Stifle/Trickblind in the Sideboard (I prefere the second) against storm-combo (Solidarity, ANT; TES...).

    Then, I had find a probably useless card in my library, ''Divert''. I think that this tech could be use in the sideboard against Black Based Deck (Pikula, Eva Green, Aggro Rock, MBA) and to resolve counter's battles (against Blue based control). What do you think?

  11. #1171

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    I'm currently building a Mono Blue Control deck, mostly to play with my friends and participate in local tournaments, however I have a couple questions:

    1) Should I run 1-2 Misdirection main, or put them sideboard?

    2) I chose to run 4 Showers instead of shackles, I like the fact that it can steal all creatures and it can hit for 2 per turn. My meta is creature heavy, you think 4 are too many?

  12. #1172
    ლ(ಠ_ಠლ)
    4eak's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2007
    Posts

    1,314

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    @ DeMarki

    1) Should I run 1-2 Misdirection main, or put them sideboard?
    Neither. MisD has no targets worth the CdisA in Legacy.

    2) I chose to run 4 Showers instead of shackles, I like the fact that it can steal all creatures and it can hit for 2 per turn. My meta is creature heavy, you think 4 are too many?
    Creature heavy metagames are perfect for Shackles. Sower is really at its best against aggro-control, but not so much against Aggro decks. If your metagame is really that creature heavy, then you really should go with Shackles.

    Krosan Grip and Qasali Pridemage are the only real reasons one should consider Sower over Shackles. That risk is very often worth it in creature heavy metas.

    Your land base and draw consistency should be quite stable to support Vedalken Shackles.




    peace,
    4eak

  13. #1173

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    We are no longer considering Morphling as a win condition due to the M10 rules changes, correct?

  14. #1174

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    Quote Originally Posted by UberNewHacks View Post
    We are no longer considering Morphling as a win condition due to the M10 rules changes, correct?
    A few pages back there is a bit of "discussion" about it. I think Morphling is still considered best.

  15. #1175
    Poisonous Foogoofiish
    deadlock's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    271

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    Following Wizards new direction and going to play just dumb and warm bodys in the form of two Call the Skybreaker (+ Shackles ofc) in my list.
    Last edited by deadlock; 07-27-2009 at 04:28 PM.
    BBB

  16. #1176
    Poisonous Foogoofiish
    deadlock's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    271

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    Sorry for the double post, but this thread needed a bump.


    So, noo love for muc?
    ...
    Then what about Moon MUCr:

    // Lands
    1 [B] Tropical Island
    6 [SHM] Island (2)
    1 [TSP] Academy Ruins
    3 [B] Volcanic Island
    4 [TE] Ancient Tomb
    3 [ON] Flooded Strand
    3 [ON] Polluted Delta

    // Spells
    3 [IA] Brainstorm
    3 [MR] Thirst for Knowledge
    4 [MR] Chrome Mox
    2 [MR] Chalice of the Void
    2 [SHM] Firespout
    3 [FD] Engineered Explosives
    4 [FD] Vedalken Shackles
    4 [DD2] Fact or Fiction
    4 [DD2] Counterspell
    2 [EVE] Call the Skybreaker
    4 [AL] Force of Will
    4 [DK] Blood Moon

    // Sideboard
    SB: 3 [B] Red Elemental Blast
    SB: 2 [FUT] Magus of the Moon
    SB: 2 [MR] Chalice of the Void
    SB: 2 [SHM] Firespout
    SB: 3 [B] Blue Elemental Blast
    SB: 3 [LRW] Sower of Temptation

    Basically you switch out B2B for Blood Moon and pick up some nice perks along the way.
    The current build can set Chalice to 1 and 2 without much hurt (only BS and CS are affected).
    The maindeck is supposed to present no real target for spot removal, so that Magus and Sower can savely brought in g2-3.
    BBB

  17. #1177

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    Quote Originally Posted by deadlock View Post
    Sorry for the double post, but this thread needed a bump.


    So, noo love for muc?
    ...
    Then what about Moon MUCr:

    // Lands
    1 [B] Tropical Island
    6 [SHM] Island (2)
    1 [TSP] Academy Ruins
    3 [B] Volcanic Island
    4 [TE] Ancient Tomb
    3 [ON] Flooded Strand
    3 [ON] Polluted Delta

    // Spells
    3 [IA] Brainstorm
    3 [MR] Thirst for Knowledge
    4 [MR] Chrome Mox
    2 [MR] Chalice of the Void
    2 [SHM] Firespout
    3 [FD] Engineered Explosives
    4 [FD] Vedalken Shackles
    4 [DD2] Fact or Fiction
    4 [DD2] Counterspell
    2 [EVE] Call the Skybreaker
    4 [AL] Force of Will
    4 [DK] Blood Moon

    // Sideboard
    SB: 3 [B] Red Elemental Blast
    SB: 2 [FUT] Magus of the Moon
    SB: 2 [MR] Chalice of the Void
    SB: 2 [SHM] Firespout
    SB: 3 [B] Blue Elemental Blast
    SB: 3 [LRW] Sower of Temptation

    Basically you switch out B2B for Blood Moon and pick up some nice perks along the way.
    The current build can set Chalice to 1 and 2 without much hurt (only BS and CS are affected).
    The maindeck is supposed to present no real target for spot removal, so that Magus and Sower can savely brought in g2-3.

    I'm not sure if a deck that is built to prey on decks with weak mana bases should run so many non basics.

  18. #1178

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    // Lands
    17 [CS] Snow-Covered Island
    3 [CS] Scrying Sheets
    2 [TSP] Academy Ruins

    // Creatures
    1 [MR] Platinum Angel

    // Spells
    4 [FNM] Brainstorm
    4 [AL] Force of Will
    3 [CHK] Sensei's Divining Top
    4 [FNM] Counterspell
    1 [TE] Capsize
    3 [US] Back to Basics
    2 [FD] Vedalken Shackles
    3 [CS] Counterbalance
    4 [MR] Chalice of the Void
    3 [MR] Thirst for Knowledge
    2 [FNM] Fact or Fiction
    4 [UD] Powder Keg

    // Sideboard
    SB: 1 [US] Back to Basics
    SB: 4 [DIS] Spell Snare
    SB: 4 [A] Blue Elemental Blast
    SB: 4 [AQ] Energy Flux
    SB: 2 [IA] Hydroblast

  19. #1179
    Member

    Join Date

    Feb 2009
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    119

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    It’s a pity that no one is talking anymore about MUC, as it is my favourite deck.
    I have built two versions which are very similar; one with a white-splash.

    Lands: 23
    3 flooded strand
    3 polluted delta
    17 island

    draw: 12
    4 fact or fiction
    4 think twice
    4 brainstorm

    counter: 16
    4 force of will
    4 counterspell
    4 spell snare
    4 force spike

    Board-control: 7
    4 vedalken shackles
    3 nevinyrral’s disk

    win-condition: 2
    2 Morphling

    SB: 4 back to basics
    SB: 4 blue elemental blast
    SB: 4 relic of progenitus
    SB: 3 Disrupt

    -------------------------------

    Lands: 23
    4 flooded strand
    4 polluted delta
    1 plain
    1 tundra
    1 swamp
    12 island

    draw: 12
    4 fact or fiction
    4 think twice
    4 brainstorm

    counter: 12
    4 force of will
    4 counterspell
    4 spell snare

    Board-control: 11
    4 swords to plowshares
    4 vedalken shackles
    3 engineered explosives

    win-condition: 2
    2 decree of justice

    SB: 4 back to basics
    SB: 4 blue elemental blast
    SB: 4 relic of progenitus
    SB: 3 Disrupt


    In my former builds, I run a draw-engine of 4 FoF and 4 TT, but sometimes my hand was very clunky – especially when I didn’t draw a TT – thus I have decided to include BS.
    However, this problem couldn’t be solved by just replacing TT with BS.

    BtB is strong, but it has nothing to do with the gameplan of the deck, so I have found it to be acceptable to put it into the SB, as I really needed room for a strong draw-engine and a strong counter-suite.


    I apologize for my English.^^

  20. #1180
    Member
    Gui's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Brasil
    Posts

    1,073

    Re: [Deck] Mono-Blue Control (MUC)

    Don't you think "strong draw engines" should benefit better of running several different situational solutions and finding then instead of several 4-ofs?
    MUC is not quite great in the format these days, but if I would run it, I would probably go to a 2~3 B2B version with at least 1~2 Kira MD since it's faster than Morphling
    3 Nevinyrral's seems too much in the mono-u version, and 3EE seems too much in the MUbwC too... you probly should go Kegs...

    I like MUC to me more of a Tempo delayer until and after you get a finisher, which can be morphling or anything else... that's why I would run strong draws, some board solutions against rushs, and couters which are the deck objective... And I would prefer Kira over Morphling cos it's easier to do the tempo role...

    Just thoughts thou... Probably MU merfolks is a lot more consistant than MUC
    If you fail to explain the reason behind your choice, technically, it's the wrong choice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape View Post
    It's one of the ten strongest cards in Legacy. And in truth, in any deck you design, you really need to have a good reason -not- to run Wasteland.
    Zerk Thread -- Really, fun deck! ^^

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)