Page 89 of 140 FirstFirst ... 397985868788899091929399139 ... LastLast
Results 1,761 to 1,780 of 2789

Thread: [Deck] Burn

  1. #1761
    3-point-shooter

    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Posts

    526

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Today is the Burn Day!

    [jpg]http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=123931&stc=1&d=1315824159[/jpg]

    We get the 5th Bolt. It is not much stressful to fit in 2 Badland, and black has also nice SB options.

    12 Fetches
    2 Badland
    6 Mountain
    4 Goblin Guide
    4 Grim Lavamancer
    20 Bolt
    4 Fireblast
    4 Price of Progress / Searing Blaze
    4 Flamerift

    [jpg]http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=123920&d=1315800071[/jpg]

    This can certainly find places in builds with Keldon Marauder.

  2. #1762
    3-point-shooter

    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Posts

    526

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Today is the Burn Day!



    We get the 5th Bolt. It is not much stressful to fit in 2 Badland, and black has also nice SB options.

    12 Fetches
    2 Badland
    6 Mountain
    4 Goblin Guide
    4 Grim Lavamancer
    20 Bolt
    4 Fireblast
    4 Price of Progress / Searing Blaze
    4 Flamerift



    This can certainly find places in builds with Keldon Marauder.

  3. #1763

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    I'm a little thrilled about Brimstone Valley, since the card can replace Browbeat, infact placing the final nail in the Browbeat coffin. [I know there are many burn players that dont like browbeat] It does make sense to combo with Keldon Marauder, though I believe there's a need for a mogg fanatic 2.0 with the Marauder or we are looking at a 3 damage spell for 3cc.

    Bump in the Night is exciting! I was a big black/red necro player so it's nice to find a use for those badlands once again.

    I'm slightly debating on adding Bob to a burn deck. Fireblast, riftbolt and whatever 3cc spells sucks ass!

    On there otherhand I've been looking for a use for [card]Kederekt Parasite[/card] for sometime.

  4. #1764
    Non-basic lands are Mountains
    ThoSha's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2011
    Posts

    173

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Burn with Bob makes sense. I thought of that a while ago either and came to the conclusion splashing black just for bob sucks. But now theres another good reason to do it.

    Brimstone Valley sucks ass, its not nearly as efficient as Browbeat. The bad thing on browbeat was the drawback that it mostly just does 5 for cmc3. I would play Vortex in this slot anyway. Much better card than a "big" bolt.
    True strength lies in action. Let the weak react to me! -Kamahl, Pit Fighter

  5. #1765
    Mega Shark VS. Giant Octopus!
    bowvamp's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2009
    Posts

    344

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Bump in the Night isn't even slightly comparable to bolt. It's lava spike for black. When lava spike was introduced, it was a debatable conclusion. This card does not make it a good idea to splash black. Also, I'm sure that this has been asked at one point or another, but what does everyone think of Shrine of Burning Rage? I think it's better than Vortex, that's for sure.
    feefox: each card in hand!!!!
    ridicolous
    only fortune

  6. #1766
    Bear Cub > Tarmogoyf

    Join Date

    Jul 2007
    Posts

    775

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    If it were better than Vortex, people would use it. No one uses it.
    Most people blindly suggest new cards for decks. True contributors also suggest what to remove. It's not about what's good, but rather what's better than the current selections.

  7. #1767
    Mega Shark VS. Giant Octopus!
    bowvamp's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2009
    Posts

    344

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Haha kirby. I know it's not life loss, but redirect and stifle effects aren't exactly running all over the place. Every red spell you play gets you a turn ahead of Vortex. It's also only a 2 mana investment up front.

    EDIT: I feel like such a tool now. Lol, I didn't know that it was 2 damage a turn effectively. That makes vortex much better (but still not cutting it for my md).
    Last edited by bowvamp; 09-13-2011 at 09:44 PM.
    feefox: each card in hand!!!!
    ridicolous
    only fortune

  8. #1768
    Bear Cub > Tarmogoyf

    Join Date

    Jul 2007
    Posts

    775

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Ok, I'll be more specific.

    1) One of Burn's worst enemies is life gain. This card does nothing to negate life gain.

    2) Sulfuric vortex can be very roughly equated to two damage per turn for a single investment of 3 mana, and starts taking effect as soon as turn three. This card takes a total of five mana, only does damage once, needs time to ramp up, and in my estimation will do less overall damage than the Vortex. It will certainly do less damage per mana invested, which ends up slowing you down.

    By all means, test it out and tell us what you think. Make sure you test against decks running Rhox War Monk, Jitte, and/or Batterskull. I love to be proven wrong, but think you'll have an uphill battle attempting to do so in this case.
    Most people blindly suggest new cards for decks. True contributors also suggest what to remove. It's not about what's good, but rather what's better than the current selections.

  9. #1769
    Member
    keys's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    London
    Posts

    1,053

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    What's better in Sullivan style burn, Figure of Destiny or Kargan Dragonlord? With MM out of the picture, I am leaning towards Figure, but the flying on the Dragon is pretty good.

  10. #1770
    Member
    RogueMTG's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2008
    Location

    Central NY
    Posts

    290

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Quote Originally Posted by keys View Post
    What's better in Sullivan style burn, Figure of Destiny or Kargan Dragonlord? With MM out of the picture, I am leaning towards Figure, but the flying on the Dragon is pretty good.
    After some testing, I came to the conclusion that they both kind of suck. Horrible top decks lategame and too slow early on, I really never wanted to see either. What does the rest of your list look like?

  11. #1771
    Bear Cub > Tarmogoyf

    Join Date

    Jul 2007
    Posts

    775

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    That said, I like FoD. Imagine pumping 5 mana into Dragonlord, and just when you're about to get him to a 4/4, they remove him. Starting small is good, and pumping at instant speed is good. That said, I don't think I'd run them either. Lavamancers, Hellspark Elementals, etc. will likely do more for you than these.
    Most people blindly suggest new cards for decks. True contributors also suggest what to remove. It's not about what's good, but rather what's better than the current selections.

  12. #1772
    The Original

    Join Date

    Jul 2009
    Location

    Austria
    Posts

    34

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    I think instant speed pump is way better, but as already said, they are both suboptimal.

    After the banning of Mental Misstep, will counterbalance rise again?
    Fast combo will definitely try get in the lead of the meta. And Burn is a little bit too slow against it.

    Has anyone already tested a list with black?
    Drakes claim to be dragons-until the dragons show up.

    The dust can count only to 50.

    Angels attacked them,............ with swords.

  13. #1773
    Bear Cub > Tarmogoyf

    Join Date

    Jul 2007
    Posts

    775

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    There's some discussion of Bump in the Night over at MTGS. But really, the best reason to splash black is for the sideboard (Perish against Goyf/Knight, etc.), and it's not clear that there's a net benefit.
    Most people blindly suggest new cards for decks. True contributors also suggest what to remove. It's not about what's good, but rather what's better than the current selections.

  14. #1774

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Quote Originally Posted by kirbysdl View Post
    There's some discussion of Bump in the Night over at MTGS. But really, the best reason to splash black is for the sideboard (Perish against Goyf/Knight, etc.), and it's not clear that there's a net benefit.
    I've been testing bump and it's best in those builds that are using fetchlands.

    Although I might omit bump for Dr Vincent Price (The Fly) [The 3/2 blue flying transformer] it seems like a good card with Goblin Guide and he offer evasion.

  15. #1775
    Member
    zmattk's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2010
    Location

    Michigan
    Posts

    37

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Hey guys, I haven't played too much burn but I figured I'd make the deck since I have all the cards and MM is banned now. I've been looking at some of the mono R lists and I see a lot of people playing Shard Volley instead of Magma Jet. Is Magma Jet just too outdated now and the 2 cc and 2 damage just not good enough even with scry?

    Also I do not plan on playing black since if I wanted to buy confidants and badlands I'd just make a different deck.

  16. #1776

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Quote Originally Posted by zmattk View Post
    Hey guys, I haven't played too much burn but I figured I'd make the deck since I have all the cards and MM is banned now. I've been looking at some of the mono R lists and I see a lot of people playing Shard Volley instead of Magma Jet. Is Magma Jet just too outdated now and the 2 cc and 2 damage just not good enough even with scry?

    Also I do not plan on playing black since if I wanted to buy confidants and badlands I'd just make a different deck.
    wow... Social influence...

    Sorry you have been mistaken, burn was really strong when Mental Misstep was legal because combo was really put into check due to fear, now we must battle combo.

    anyway...

    Shard Volley sucks because the card requires a mountain and we play fireblast.

    I'm not really a fan of Magma Jet because a good build dont need to scry, although players that play with 20 to 22 mountains may find Magma Jet helpful... then again 22 lands is too much IMHO

    Bob sucks, for starters we play fireblast (a 6 damage hit) but what makes the card worse is that we are skipping turn 2 for a draw at turn 3.

  17. #1777
    Member

    Join Date

    Sep 2008
    Location

    Santiago, Chile
    Posts

    58

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Quote Originally Posted by bowvamp View Post
    Haha kirby. I know it's not life loss, but redirect and stifle effects aren't exactly running all over the place. Every red spell you play gets you a turn ahead of Vortex. It's also only a 2 mana investment up front.

    EDIT: I feel like such a tool now. Lol, I didn't know that it was 2 damage a turn effectively. That makes vortex much better (but still not cutting it for my md).
    I play 3 shrines in Sligh and has been totally awesome. It almost reads: "your red cards deal 1 more damage to target player" It fixes the problem of losing gas in the lategame that almost all mono red burn heavy decks have, and can easily deal 8 damage by it's own. 3 copies seem fine to me, and I wouldn't compare it to Vortex. Each one has it's advantages, and playing both in the deck seems totally fine for me.

  18. #1778
    Member
    Kanadell~'s Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2011
    Location

    Catalunya, Spain
    Posts

    27

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    IMO, Bump in the night is not worth to splash only for it, cause it makes our manabase weaker. And brimstone volley is not so god 'cause it costs 3 and does 5 in the best case, so it's not worth it.
    Currently playing in Legacy:

    Burn
    Affinity
    Merfolk

  19. #1779

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Artifacts
    4x Great Furnace
    4x Mishra's Bauble
    4x Ankh of Mishra
    4x Urza's Bauble
    4x Lodestone Bauble

    Creatures
    4x Keldon Marauders
    4x Simian Spirit Guide

    Land
    12x Mountain

    Spells
    4x Fireblast
    4x Lava Spike
    4x Rite of Flame
    4x Rift Bolt
    4x Lightning Bolt

    Sideboard
    3x Smash to Smithereens/Shattering Spree
    3x Scald
    3x Shrapnel Blast
    3x Goblin Arsonist
    3x Red Elemental Blast/Guttural Response

    My take on Ankh Burn...also with Baubles for ultimate drawing potential and some ramp...what do you think?

  20. #1780

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Burn loses to a resolved Batterskull. Burn loses to Storm or Reanimator getting Iona. This are issues that need to be resolved before Burn can compete.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)