Your sb is very similar to mine with the exception of dryad arbor and thoughtseize. I think it's a meta-call. If there aren't many t1 kill decks like belcher around, I think thoughtseize is better. I just wanted 2 traps as a way to interact t0. Instead of arbor, I left pridemage in the board. Just curious, what'd you remove from the main for pridemage? I'm guessing a quirion or birchlore ranger.
A Quirion Ranger, yes. I don't think Trap is even better vs. T0 kill style things for the most part - TES Silences or discards it, and has 4 Probe for information anyway. Belcher gets owned, sure. Oops.dec has Therapy. The one place where the targeted discard can be pretty shitty is against Omnitell with Leylines from the board, but dunno how bad that matchup is overall. You should just be faster overall and have Karakas, Pridemage and Teeg so *shrug*
Originally Posted by Lemnear
I agree that silence is better against trap than thoughtseize. However, trap is better on the draw than on the play. If they had discard, they would discard your thoughtseize anyways. Probe gives them information but doesn't get rid of the trap so they'll have to dig for an answer before going off. Rogue hermit.dec is wildly inconsistent and uses cabal therapy to discard their own combo pieces. Sneak and show is actually a terrible matchup because they have a ton of counters to protect their combo while disrupting ours. Instead of mindtrap break/thoughtseize, another route to go is adding jitte, viridian shaman, etc to improve other matchups. I think any of these are reasonable.
Well that was a short period in the DTB section!
On the bright side: Let those Engineered Plagues go back to the dusty collections they came from so that we can shine again!
It's all good. This deck needs a bit of obscurity to do well since it's somewhat simple to hate out with the correct sideboard cards. In other news, I'm a little more than halfway done with my attempt at an updated primer. I guess I'm supposed to just post it here? Or do I PM it to a mod and they toss it on the first page? I have no idea how that works. If one of you wants to take a look and perhaps edit it, PM me and I can let you check it out on google docs when I'm done.
Wooo! Got First place tonight at our weekly legacy tournament. 13 people showed up so we had four rounds and I went 4-0. Didn't lose a single game so I ended up 8-0 for games. Luck was on my side, though.
Round 1 against Sneak Show he couldn't find anything to go with his Show and Tell.
Round 2 was against and he kept a sketch opening hand game 1 and I had 2 DRS out by turn 2. Game 2 My opening hand was Dryad militant, Bojuka bog, fetch, and a few other cards so I shut him down hard after after he threw some 20 cards in the GY. (The turn 4 RiP was pretty sick too).
Round 3 I played against a UW aggro-control suppression field deck. Game 1 was close because we just kept beating each other but he couldn't find any StP so I had lethal a turn faster. Game 2 I was able to combo out before he got anywhere.
Round 4 I played against maverick and comboed out pretty quickly both games.
Won $24 of store credit. So I either can play "free" the next 5 weeks, or buy some cards.
Legacy:
Combo Elves
WB Tokens
Cheeri0s
http://sales.starcitygames.com//deck...p?DeckID=53937
Riley Curran's deck from the last SCG Open is 62 cards O_o
He used the extra slots for Fyndhorn Elves.
Anyone have concrete boarding plans for NO Elves?
Sideboard (Viridian Shaman main)
1 Progenitus
1 Natural Order
4 Cabal Therapy
1 Thoughtseize
1 Gaddock Teeg
1 Qasali Pridemage
2 Abrupt Decay
1 Karakas
1 Bojuka Bog
1 Dryad Arbor
1 Scavenging Ooze
Storm:
-1 Heritage
-2 Crop Rotation
-1 Priest
-1 Regal
-1 Viridian Shaman
-1 Visionary
+4 Therapy
+1 Thoughtseize
+1 Teeg
+1 NO
Originally Posted by Lemnear
I can only assume there is a fault in registration. I think he just played one fyndhorn and cut quirion for a viridian.
62 cards seems so wrong with regards to conventional deckbuilding.
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what's for lunch.
Played another GPT today.
Almost the same LSV decklist with 3 Cradle and 1 Crop Rotation and some changes to the sideboard
4 Cabal Therapy
1 Natural Order
1 Progenitus
1 Scavenging Ooze
2 Abrupt Decay
1 Quasili Pridemage
1 Gaddock Teeg
1 Crop Rotation
1 Bojuka Bog
1 Karakas
1 Dryad Arbor
Round 1: Gösta with G/W HelmRIP Enchantress
Game 1
Mulligan to 5 but managed to play NO turn 3 for the win
Sideboard
- 1 Bayou, Cradle, Elvish Visionary, Quirion Ranger, Birchlore Rangers, Heritage Druid, Deathrite Shaman
+ 2 Abrupt Decay, 1 Progenitus, Natural Order, Crop Rotation, Dryad Arbor, Quasili Pridemage
Game 2
Glimpse turn 3. 1-0 (2-0)
Round 2: Tobias with LED Dredge
Game 1
He manages to get a good turn 1, but can't kill me and doesn't therapy my NO before I play it turn 3 and attack him down to 1. I win on my next turn.
Sideboard
- 1 Cradle, Herritage Druid, Priest of Titiania, Birchlore Rangers, Quirion Ranger, Fyndhorn Elves
+ 1 Progenitus, Dryad Arbor, Natural Order, Scavenging Ooze, Crop Rotation, Bojuka Bog
Game 2
Long and strange game. He holds a hand with gas but no dredger. I have to play Bojuka Bog from my hand turn 2 to remove a Faithless Looting and 4 other cards. He manages to dredge his deck but I get enough mana to gain about 30 life with my Ooze in 3 turns and kill him with a Deathrite Shaman trough his Stormtide Leviathan. 2-0 (4-0)
Round 3: Jesper with Burn
Game 1
Turn 2 Glimpse into lots of guys, hardcast Behemoth turn 3
Sideboard
- 1 Cradle, Priest, Quirion Ranger, Bichlore Rangers, Fyndhorn Elves, Elvish Visionary
+ 2 Abrupt Decay, 1 Scavenging Ooze, 1 Dryad Arbor, Natural Order, Progenitus
Game 2
He drew 5 lands, I win turn 5 playing around Price to Progress + Fireblast on 7 life. He had a hand with almost nothing. 3-0 (6-0)
Round 4. Draw
Round 5. Draw
Top 8: Matthias with U/G Enchantress
Game 1
Turn 3 Regal Force with mana to spare. Glimpse and NO does the job without passing the turn.
Sideboard
- 1 Cradle, Fetch, Fyndhorn Elves, Quirion Ranger, Bichlore Ranger, 2 Herritage Druid (took the wrong card, should have been a Visionary, blaming 3 hours of sleep)
+ 2 Abrupt Decay, 1 Quasili Pridemage, 1 Scavenging Ooze, 1 Natural Order, 1 Dryad Arbor
Game 2
Turn 3 NO Behemoth for exactly lethal. 4-0 (8-0)
Top 4: Scoop against a player going to the GP.
I still sideboard a bit to much I believe. I think I like Progenitus a bit to much, like round 1 and 3 in hindsight I shouldn't board it in. But 11-1 in played matches in the last 3 tournaments so I must be doing something right when playing:)
Last edited by spetznaz; 03-17-2013 at 09:53 PM.
Congratulations for your performance!
That Dryad Arbor you used on your R1's sideboarding did not seem to be on your SB, and if I did not miscount, your SB contained only 14 cards. I guess that the missing one was Dryad Arbor ...?
And how do you (and others) that play with a combination of 2x Crop Rotation + Bojuka Bog + Karakas on you 75 evaluate this combination?
...
On another issue, I, too find myself in doubt of which are the "only right match ups" to sideboard Progenitus in, so that I don't end up oversideboarding and diluting the deck.
I think that I would not bring in Progenitus in your R1 match, and that I would, instead, try to race them (only counting with the extra help from Qasali + Abrupt Decays).
But then, couldn't Progenitus stop/lock the Hem-RIP combo? If this is so, I would end up losing this potential out...
Against Burn, I guess I would bring Progenitus in, too, to have a potential "safe" way of keeping a creature threat on the battlefield, so that I don't loose to any "Piroclasm effect". (Again, I don't know if it is the "right" way of playing this match up with this list.)
My mana base for crop rotation sb plan is similar to LSV's except -2 fetch (8), +1 horizon canopy, +1 forest. I'll typically side out 1 forest for karakas or bojuka bog. If I bring in both (reanimator), I'll side out horizon canopy as well.
As for NO-prog, I'll bring them in against any fair deck not running heavy countermagic.
Edit: Progenitus does not stop Helm/RIP combo since RIP exiles progenitus as an "instead".
Last edited by nudon; 03-18-2013 at 04:34 PM.
Thanks!
Yes a Dryad Arbor in the side, that is correct:) Elves is very well placed in my local meta, lots of fair decks and almost no combo.
I play 3 Cradle/1 Crop Rotation and the second crop rotation in the board. That configuration seems versitile, you can side out a Crop Rotation against counter heavy decks and still have a reasonable big chance of getting cradle, or increase your virtual "Cradle count" to 5 versus decks where you have to be a fast combo deck. If i board in Karakas/Bojuka Bog it is usually in place of a Forest/Karakas depending on if I bring in Pridemage/Teeg.
Going to play combo elves at SCG KC. I got 33rd at St Louis last time so hopefully I can do just as well. I'm going to try and do playtesting this week because I now have access to a second cradle and natural orders. Here is the decklist I'm going to play:
creatures - 31
4x Deathrite Shaman
2x Llanowar Elves
1x Dryad Arbor
1x Quirion Ranger
4x Elvish Visionary
4x Wirewood Symbiote
4x Nettle Sentinel
4x Heritage Druid
3x Birchlore Rangers
1x Regal Force
1x Elvish Archdruid
1x Craterhoof Behemoth
1x Emrakul, The Aeons Torn
Spells - 13
4x Glimpse of Nature
4x Green Sun's Zenith
3x Natural Order
2x Crop Rotation
Land - 16
8x Fetches
4x Forest
2x Gaea's Cradle
1x Cavern of Souls
1x Bayou
The problem I come across is assembling a sideboard. What I'm thinking of running is:
Sideboard - 14
1x Krosan Grip
1x Beast Within
1x Viridian Shaman
2x Inquisition of Kozilek
2x Cabal Therapy
1x Gaddock Teeg
3x Leyline of Sanctity
1x Dryad Militant
1x Bojuka Bog
Which leaves me with one open spot. I maY be able to get a maze of ith or karakas but it's a very unlikely. I also have a second RiP I could add fore more GY hate, I have more IoK and cabal therapy, more beast within and k-grip, another leyline, surgical extraction, and mindbreak trap. What're your guys thoughts?
Legacy:
Combo Elves
WB Tokens
Cheeri0s
MonoG Elves! finished 2nd at my LGS yesterday. It ran Natural Order into Craterhoof win though, which gave it CRAZY consistency. There were 4 rounds, and it went 3-1 (first 3 matches 2-0, then lost in finals vs ANT).
I was playing Rw Gobbos, and it beat me pretty easily.
The decks were:
MonoG Elves! Combo
ANT
Rg Gobbos
Rw Gobbos
Junk
Stoneblade
Miracles
Burn/Sligh
Mystic Affinity
''The man who passes the sentence should swing the sword.'' Lord Eddard Stark - A Game of Thrones
-Adsum
-ChrisMeister on MTGO
4 Nettle Sentinel
4 Heritage Druid
4 Birchlore Rangers
4 Quirion Ranger
4 Wirewood Symbiote
4 Llanowar
4 Fyndhorn
4 Visionary
1 Craterhoof
1 Regal force
1 Summoner's Pact
2 GSZ
4 Glimpse
3 Natural Order
1 Crop Rotation
13 Forest
1 Cradle
1 Dryad
He didn't bring a board with him though, but he ran over everyone, lol.
He swung for 120 or so Trample damage on T3 vs Rg Gobbos, lol.
''The man who passes the sentence should swing the sword.'' Lord Eddard Stark - A Game of Thrones
-Adsum
-ChrisMeister on MTGO
No Mortarpod, no Emrakul, no Viridian Zealot? That guy is so irresponsible he deserved to lose :D
Are GSZ/Pact numbers budget restrictions or intentional?
Originally Posted by Lemnear
He didn't even feel like playing. :P
We had to convince him, lol.
I don't think the numbers are due to budget concerns (he owns 3 Cradles, one Urza foil), but just for the heck of it. He doesn't really care for his Elves! deck, the money he invests into MTG goes into his pimped out EDH, lol. :P
''The man who passes the sentence should swing the sword.'' Lord Eddard Stark - A Game of Thrones
-Adsum
-ChrisMeister on MTGO
Well, apart from ANT that field is pretty free to Elves to be honest. Even more so when monogreen can scoff at mana disruption attempts.
Originally Posted by Lemnear
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)