Whenever I see a kid in a wheelchair it makes me a little sad. Because I always think, "Gee, they could have used those same wheels to make a bike for a regular kid. What a waste."
Matthias Hunt prominently featured a variant of this deck in the Pro Tour and did well with it.
Teferi rose because of some almost Mono-Blue deck that happens to run a splash for Blood Moon (and Spreading Sea for basics) to shit all over Modern's greedy mana bases, with seemingly great effect.
So, what you're saying is that after I sat on my Amulets of Vigor for years, they spiked not a month later than I have sold them? This is a bad bad day...
![]()
That's not hoarding. If it is, I'm responsible for fetch and dual spikes across the board...
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
At least Amulet is a 4-of maindeck card, whereas Teferi is a 1-of in the sideboard, lol.
Basically all the stuff that did well at the Pro Tour jumped (Batterskull, Pyro Ascension, Blood Moon, PiF, Azusa, Snapcaster, Goyf, Cryptic etc.)
Speculators buy out everything that gets hyped in the wake of a GP/PT - it isn't just limited to Legacy.
See: Fist of Suns
"If magic is your crutch, cast it aside and learn to walk without it." —Teferi
Which decks ran Porphyry Nodes?
Edit: Okay, the winning deck. It's still strange, though.
Play 4 Card Blind!
Currently Playing
Legacy: Dark Depths
EDH: 5-Color Hermit Druid
Currently Brewing: [Deck] Sadistic Sacrament / Chalice NO Eldrazi
why cards are so expensive...hoarders
Are you being sarcastic? I mean, why would that happen? That's green, nodes is white. The applications are different just on color alone.
Edit: Barook, Nodes has been used to off-and-on moderate success in landstill since it's printing.
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
Had an interesting discussion at our kitchen table game last night.
How much damage could a single person and $100k do to the magic card market?
I was thinking with the right buy and sell policy a person could maybe double their original investment once per year by manipulating card prices.
A large part of the discussion is I have a friend who is a commodities trader and very good at it, and she was saying that most of what players do with cards based investments/market manipulation would be multiple years of prison time on the commodities market.
She went on to say that with cards the behavior is not only completely legal but with the short run of older stuff could be very profitable to say buy 2000 zendikar fetch lands at avg. $50 each make the price spike by $10 each and flip for a $20k profit.
i went a step further and suggested a mix of legacy staples as a portfolio. Duals, fetches fow led etc. Stuff that if it started disappearing in the market place would cause a panic buy.
Aka SCG's business model?
I could see this working out very well. Wizards takes years to react to market shortages. Buying out Modern staples might work out even better since that market is even volatile than the Legacy market (and let's be realistic, the demand is bigger). I'd say that the Legacy market is already reaching the upper limit for certain staples, but the ceiling for Modern is still high.
Wizards tries to protect the collectors, but who protects US from the speculators? Edit: That would be an interesting topic by itself.
Legacy is easily attackable if you go for the blue duals since they're the format's Achilles' heel (thanks, Brainstorm and other blue, broken crap!).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)