Page 66 of 98 FirstFirst ... 165662636465666768697076 ... LastLast
Results 1,301 to 1,320 of 1947

Thread: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

  1. #1301
    The green Ancestral
    ESG's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2010
    Location

    Seattle, WA
    Posts

    1,322

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by matty View Post
    Is it a bad idea to side out Delvers against Miracles? I've been trying it out lately and it works pretty well. It just seems like they get plowed before they do anything worthwhile and we have a lot of sideboard cards that can really shut them down.

    Abrupt Decay has been good enough to make me think they're worth having 4 of in our 75 as well.
    If you're siding out Delvers, you are possibly playing the wrong deck. If Delver isn't what you want, then why are you on a Delver deck? It's one of the best tempo creatures there is -- if not the best -- and you're a tempo deck. If Delver is considered not good enough vs. Miracles, then either you're an ineffective tempo strategy and you need a different shell, or you should be playing a midrange or control deck that you feel is better positioned against Miracles, like maybe Grixis Control.

  2. #1302
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2011
    Location

    Denmark
    Posts

    71

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by ESG View Post
    If you're siding out Delvers, you are possibly playing the wrong deck. If Delver isn't what you want, then why are you on a Delver deck? It's one of the best tempo creatures there is -- if not the best -- and you're a tempo deck. If Delver is considered not good enough vs. Miracles, then either you're an ineffective tempo strategy and you need a different shell, or you should be playing a midrange or control deck that you feel is better positioned against Miracles, like maybe Grixis Control.
    I could not disagree more. Delver strategies are very powerfull because you can switch rolls between aggro and controll. Delver is a big part of the aggro side of that.

    The agressive side is a very good baseline strategy for pre-board games, it gives you game against most of the field, but it is often suboptimal post-board. After board you want to be either agressive or controlling depending on the matchup.

    That being said i am currently experimenting with cutting the delvers entirely to play more tarmogoyfs ;-)

  3. #1303
    We are lost. We can never go home.
    Einherjer's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2011
    Location

    Noricum
    Posts

    1,475

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by Goddik View Post
    That being said i am currently experimenting with cutting the delvers entirely to play more tarmogoyfs ;-)
    That's also what I've been trying for a couple of days now. :)

    To be honest, though. I'm trying a lot of things right now.

    Greetings
    My articles here, here, here and here | My current list | Follow me on Twitter | Questions I answered.

  4. #1304
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts

    1,658

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by Einherjer View Post
    That's also what I've been trying for a couple of days now. :)

    To be honest, though. I'm trying a lot of things right now.

    Greetings
    I tried my Delver-less list above -1 Deluge, -1 Golgari Charm, -1 Taiga, +1 Counterspell, +1 Forked Bolt, +1 Volcanic Island (and changing the Catacombs to Polluted Delta) online and at my local Legacy FNM and I really do like having the Delvers over the bigger creatures. It really helps out in the combo matchups to have a fast clock, especially when you don't have to rely on DRS to have a threat and disruption on turn 2 or in Delver mirrors where you want removal + open mana early since you're almost never the beatdown in these matchups and tapping out early on for a Wall isn't great.

    I'm also trying a bunch of different decks right now, and I'm not sure where I'm going to land.

  5. #1305
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

  6. #1306
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2011
    Location

    Denmark
    Posts

    71

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Yeah, that's me.

    Have been playing a couple of dailies over the weekend 1x (2-2) 2 x (3-1) and 1 (4-0).

    Tarmogoyfs have for the record been amazing, i have not missed the delvers, but have won several games against grixis decks where they had tons of bolts, some where they even resolved one or more digs. Tarmogoyf just munches their face, and allows me to be agressive, where delver would simply die.

    Combo seems to be completely dead on modo at the moment. I don't know if it has been banished by the millions of cabal therapies and elementals flying around

    3 of my losses have been to infect. I have no idea how it is happening, but he (cartesian) seem to grind me out.....

    @Einherjer, would love to know what you are brewing.... Miracles not digging hard enough?

    As a side note, the badlands manabase is way superior to the taiga one. I don't know why i never saw this.... Badlands actually casts multiple spells in the deck

  7. #1307
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by Goddik View Post
    Yeah, that's me.

    Have been playing a couple of dailies over the weekend 1x (2-2) 2 x (3-1) and 1 (4-0).

    Tarmogoyfs have for the record been amazing, i have not missed the delvers, but have won several games against grixis decks where they had tons of bolts, some where they even resolved one or more digs. Tarmogoyf just munches their face, and allows me to be agressive, where delver would simply die.

    Combo seems to be completely dead on modo at the moment. I don't know if it has been banished by the millions of cabal therapies and elementals flying around

    3 of my losses have been to infect. I have no idea how it is happening, but he (cartesian) seem to grind me out.....

    @Einherjer, would love to know what you are brewing.... Miracles not digging hard enough?

    As a side note, the badlands manabase is way superior to the taiga one. I don't know why i never saw this.... Badlands actually casts multiple spells in the deck
    Nice, I was able to 3-1 today vs Infect (Cartesian, 2-1), Storm (2-1), Grixis Control (0-2), and Sylvan Plug (2-0) with the GP Lille top 8 version (with Delvers).

    I really want to try out Goddik's version but I am missing Scalding Tarns, Jaces, and Thoughtseizes; all of which are pretty expensive online.

  8. #1308
    Member
    AfroSmile's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2013
    Location

    Switzerland
    Posts

    62

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by Goddik View Post
    As a side note, the badlands manabase is way superior to the taiga one. I don't know why i never saw this.... Badlands actually casts multiple spells in the deck
    I totally agree with you! Since I saw this list from a previous post, I always play my manabase like this: 7 fetchs, 3 tropical, 2 Usea, 2 Volcanic, 1 Badlands and 4 Waste.

    Quote Originally Posted by wcm8 View Post
    You always search for tropical first and then you can go for Usea, Volcanic or Badlands depending on your hand. If I have Tropical + Badlands, I usually go for Usea because of deathrite activation. With this manabase, you can go for Liliana in the sideboard if you want. I don't play her anymore but she pretty fine in the deck. 7 fetch may be to low when we are running 3 Dig through time. Sometimes i feel like my graveyard was not big enough.

    I'm actually playing 3 decay but I'm considering to move one in sideboard and go with the 3 thoughseize + 3-4 goyf build.
    T1: Thoughseize
    T2: Tarmo + Daze back up seems to be a strong start. If you go delverless, i'll go 4 discard for sur.

    This new delverless approach is interesting. I feel it like a blue midrange list being a sort of blue Jund. Can have some strong start and then tempo out the opponent with cheap spell and card advantage. Maybe give a try to punishing fire. :-P
    But I think it isn't tempo anymore. Maybe we have to start a new thread in New and Developmental Section of the forum.
    I'm sad because I have no time to test this version of the deck. :'(

  9. #1309

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Hello bUrg'ers! First time posting in this thread. I recently completely my deck and took it for a spin this Sunday at an SCG IQ, the first round being the first games I've ever played with the deck. I ended up not losing a game until the finals, where I punted game 2 to lose 0-2 overall. Below are the decklist (Noah Walker build taken from SCG list) and details.

    Creatures (14)
    4 Deathrite Shaman
    4 Delver of Secrets
    2 Gurmag Angler
    1 True-Name Nemesis
    3 Young Pyromancer

    Lands (18)
    4 Flooded Strand
    4 Scalding Tarn
    1 Tropical Island
    2 Underground Sea
    3 Volcanic Island
    4 Wasteland

    Spells (28)
    4 Brainstorm
    4 Daze
    2 Dig Through Time
    4 Force of Will
    4 Lightning Bolt
    1 Pyroblast
    1 Spell Pierce
    1 Forked Bolt
    3 Gitaxian Probe
    4 Ponder

    Sideboard
    2 Grafdigger's Cage
    1 Pithing Needle
    1 Abrupt Decay
    1 Sylvan Library
    1 Dismember
    1 Flusterstorm
    2 Pyroblast
    1 Spell Pierce
    1 Submerge
    1 Vendilion Clique
    2 Cabal Therapy
    1 Forked Bolt

    The rounds in order:
    Abzan Land Destruction - Win 2-0 (I assume had loams, but I never saw them. Did have cycling lands, sinkholes, KotR, BoBs, etc.)
    Affinity - Win 2-0 (Believe this was his first legacy tourney. Nice kid, hope he keeps playing the format.)
    Shardless BUG - Win 2-0 (Made a play I learned watching Eli Kasis. Bolted a 3/4 'goyf, which my opponent was happy to let resolve, then cast Angler delving my yard which kills the 'goyf before he can respond.)
    UWR Stoneblade - ID (We play it out and I win in 3.)
    UWR Stoneblade - ID

    Top 8:
    Merfolk - Win 2-0 (Close games, but gitaxian probes give me the information I need to sequence much better than him.)
    UWR Stoneblade - Win 2-0 (I remember probes again giving me super valuable information to time my threats/wastelands perfectly.)
    Infect - 0-2 (Opponent picked his times to go for it very well and in game 2 I just forgot how vines works.)

    Overall, the deck just clicked from the moment I started playing it. I come from playing Elves and have never touched brainstorm/FoW before, so it was so fun getting to cast new spells. I loved the maindeck and wouldn't change a thing. The SB is flexible as always, and decay will probably get changed for something else before the next tourney. Likely a darkblast, surgical extraction, or null rod. I can't wait to play it more and (hopefully) contribute to the thread.

  10. #1310
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Just 3-0d at my shop. Beat Maverick 2-1, beat jeskai blade 2-0, then beat bant blade 2-1. Still playing Tomas Mar's prague eternal list, but with more removal in the sideboard.

  11. #1311
    Member
    AfroSmile's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2013
    Location

    Switzerland
    Posts

    62

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by MadRhetoric17 View Post
    Hello bUrg'ers! First time posting in this thread. I recently completely my deck and took it for a spin this Sunday at an SCG IQ, the first round being the first games I've ever played with the deck. I ended up not losing a game until the finals, where I punted game 2 to lose 0-2 overall. Below are the decklist (Noah Walker build taken from SCG list) and details.

    Creatures (14)
    4 Deathrite Shaman
    4 Delver of Secrets
    2 Gurmag Angler
    1 True-Name Nemesis
    3 Young Pyromancer

    Lands (18)
    4 Flooded Strand
    4 Scalding Tarn
    1 Tropical Island
    2 Underground Sea
    3 Volcanic Island
    4 Wasteland

    Spells (28)
    4 Brainstorm
    4 Daze
    2 Dig Through Time
    4 Force of Will
    4 Lightning Bolt
    1 Pyroblast
    1 Spell Pierce
    1 Forked Bolt
    3 Gitaxian Probe
    4 Ponder

    Sideboard
    2 Grafdigger's Cage
    1 Pithing Needle
    1 Abrupt Decay
    1 Sylvan Library
    1 Dismember
    1 Flusterstorm
    2 Pyroblast
    1 Spell Pierce
    1 Submerge
    1 Vendilion Clique
    2 Cabal Therapy
    1 Forked Bolt

    ...
    Thank you for sharing, but it's not really bUrg Delver. It's more like Grixis Delver splashing green for deathrite activation. There is only 1 green spell in the sideboard (except of deathrite shaman) and usually there is no green spell in this deck.
    You maybe want to check this threads instead.

    bUrg Delver play spell of all the 4 colors. You can check this deck too. It's really fun to play it and it becomes more popular in EU. ;-)

    Quote Originally Posted by ironclad8690 View Post
    Just 3-0d at my shop. Beat Maverick 2-1, beat jeskai blade 2-0, then beat bant blade 2-1. Still playing Tomas Mar's prague eternal list, but with more removal in the sideboard.
    Can you be more precise and tell us what change you made in your sideboard. I think it's really important to write which cards you changed and how you felt them in your 75 in your meta. Sometimes, it's really hard to have a good sideboard in this deck. Having detailed report about the sideboard card is really useful and may improve our understanding of deck from your point of view. If you know what I mean.

  12. #1312
    Member
    Manipulato's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2013
    Location

    Kempten, Germany
    Posts

    467

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by AfroSmile View Post
    Thank you for sharing, but it's not really bUrg Delver. It's more like Grixis Delver splashing green for deathrite activation. There is only 1 green spell in the sideboard (except of deathrite shaman) and usually there is no green spell in this deck.
    You maybe want to check this threads instead.

    bUrg Delver play spell of all the 4 colors. You can check this deck too. It's really fun to play it and it becomes more popular in EU. ;-)



    Can you be more precise and tell us what change you made in your sideboard. I think it's really important to write which cards you changed and how you felt them in your 75 in your meta. Sometimes, it's really hard to have a good sideboard in this deck. Having detailed report about the sideboard card is really useful and may improve our understanding of deck from your point of view. If you know what I mean.
    +1 both statements
    Splash more green for AD or Library MD and your in our club
    Currently playing
    Eldrazi

  13. #1313

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Ah, thanks for the clarification guys. I really wasn't sure which thread was right since there are many new variations of this type of deck. Just means I need to monitor both threads :)

  14. #1314
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Mainboard: Mar's exact 75 -1 Misty Rainforest +1 Wasteland, -1 Snapcaster Mage +1 True-Name Nemesis

    Sideboard:
    2 Golgari Charm
    2 Flusterstorm
    2 Nihil Spellbomb
    1 Pyroblast
    1 Red Elemental Blast
    1 Ancient Grudge
    1 Submerge
    1 Maelstrom Pulse
    1 Dismember
    1 Forked Bolt
    1 Grafdigger's Cage
    1 Vendilion Clique

    The pulse was very good, being able to take out whatever permanent I needed to get rid of. I dont have as much green in my meta so Submerge was reduced to 1 copy. The singleton Library in the main is enough due to the lack of miracles in my meta, so I replaced that with a Dismember for the fair matchups. Finally, with the last Wasteland moved to the mainboard, I had room for Grafdigger's because I expect Storm and Elves.

    The games I lost were often game 1s where the countermagic was bad (Maverick) and I board in extremely efficient answers in their place (Golg Charm, Forked Bolt).

    In the UWR blade matchup, game 1 I established a true name with him at 10 life, and even though he connected 1 time with a jitte, lightning bolt let me race him. Game 2 he bloodmooned himself out of the game while I had a Deathrite in play with a couple of lands in the yard, so I played a goyf and beat down.

    The bant match was strange. Game 1 I tempod him out easily with 3 lightning bolts to answer his creatures. Game 2 he played two noble hierarchs and a clique and beat for 5 for several turns while I was stuck on 1 Underground Sea (brainstorm + ponder in opener couldnt find more). Game 3 was super close, but I had just enough DRS activations for the win.
    Last edited by ironclad8690; 07-21-2015 at 03:18 PM.

  15. #1315
    Member
    AfroSmile's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2013
    Location

    Switzerland
    Posts

    62

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by ironclad8690 View Post
    Mainboard: Mar's exact 75 -1 Misty Rainforest +1 Wasteland, -1 Snapcaster Mage +1 True-Name Nemesis

    Sideboard:
    2 Golgari Charm
    2 Flusterstorm
    2 Nihil Spellbomb
    1 Pyroblast
    1 Red Elemental Blast
    1 Ancient Grudge
    1 Submerge
    1 Maelstrom Pulse
    1 Dismember
    1 Forked Bolt
    1 Grafdigger's Cage
    1 Vendilion Clique

    ...
    Really thank you! It's really helpful and always interesting. For some people, certain choices are obvious but it's not the case of everybody. We have to think about that.
    And it provides a more methodical approach of the deck development.

    I think the primer needs really a big update. The deck is becoming more popular and the Dig Through Time is really necessary in the pack.
    Some relevant information must be underlying like how to play some cards like Sylvan Library.
    We can take some relevant article like the one of Einherjer about forcing Top T1 against Miracle, etc.

    Sasan is always on the forum or did he leave?
    If he's here, we can always send him the modification of the primer. Or maybe he can come back here and play bUrg again!

  16. #1316
    Member

    Join Date

    Jul 2015
    Location

    Austin, TX
    Posts

    11

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    The mana-base in this thing terrifies me. Not on what to play, but doesnt it just get crushed by RUG delver?

  17. #1317
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2011
    Location

    Denmark
    Posts

    71

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    As bad as being 4 c is for our manabase, us having deathrite shaman is worse for them. So i would say, not necessarily

    What makes the matchup challenging is typically more that their creatures are better and more resilient then ours. They have nimble mongoos and tarmogoyf which are both very hard to handle, whereas we have only tarmogoyf that doesnt die to bolt (in the go top 8 list), or nemesis (in the more midrangy list)

  18. #1318
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Played in a Daily and went 0-2 drop losing to two burn decks. I have to say this match up doesn't seem very good. Grim lavamancer can shrink goyf and dome all of our creatures. I also drew somewhat poorly, but it really felt like I was behind the entire game. Anyone else experience this?

  19. #1319
    Member
    AfroSmile's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2013
    Location

    Switzerland
    Posts

    62

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by Goddik View Post
    As bad as being 4 c is for our manabase, us having deathrite shaman is worse for them. So i would say, not necessarily

    What makes the matchup challenging is typically more that their creatures are better and more resilient then ours. They have nimble mongoos and tarmogoyf which are both very hard to handle, whereas we have only tarmogoyf that doesnt die to bolt (in the go top 8 list), or nemesis (in the more midrangy list)
    And we have bolt AND decay. So their goyf can be kill too. It's not the case with us or it's at least 2 for 1. :D
    But it's true that sometimes it goes wrong and they can just mana denial us to death...

    Quote Originally Posted by ironclad8690 View Post
    Played in a Daily and went 0-2 drop losing to two burn decks. I have to say this match up doesn't seem very good. Grim lavamancer can shrink goyf and dome all of our creatures. I also drew somewhat poorly, but it really felt like I was behind the entire game. Anyone else experience this?
    I play the matchup in aggro mode, we don't stand a chance if we go in the mid/late game. I think Goyf is really good (stop goblin guide and other early aggression). We can let land/instant/sorcery in our graveyard pretty easily.
    Creature comes too if we play a deathrite. :D

    But this match up is sometimes really hard. I feel like it's like we are really dependent of our draw. Searing blaze and PoP are really hard for us too.

  20. #1320
    Member

    Join Date

    Jul 2015
    Location

    Austin, TX
    Posts

    11

    Re: [Deck] bUrg Tempo

    Quote Originally Posted by AfroSmile View Post
    And we have bolt AND decay. So their goyf can be kill too. It's not the case with us or it's at least 2 for 1. :D
    But it's true that sometimes it goes wrong and they can just mana denial us to death...
    Yes, I was not questioning 4-color delver's power level. It is the mana base that is terrifying and is the obvious angle you attack this kind of strategy.

    It can completely fold to wasteland / stifle. Also opening hands like Abrupt Decay, Tarmogoyf, Deathrite, Deathrite, Wasteland, XXX, Volcanic Island do happen.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)