Page 31 of 47 FirstFirst ... 2127282930313233343541 ... LastLast
Results 601 to 620 of 932

Thread: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

  1. #601
    Force of Will is my bitch
    Finn's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2004
    Location

    South Florida
    Posts

    2,977

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    There are several versions of wasteland strangler in the past, but they were all 3/3 for 4. I agree that this tiny power creep is a big deal. Notably, you can choose not to use the effect, so it will not kill itself.
    "Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job."
    "Politicians are like diapers. They should be changed often and for the same reason."
    "Governing is too important to be left to people as silly as politicians."
    "Politicians were mostly people who'd had too little morals and ethics to stay lawyers."

  2. #602

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Retreat to Coralhelm + Knight of the Reliquary

    Seems like it could be silly. Pump the knight. Use fetchlands for extra retreat triggers to tap down their creatures, and fetch the blue land with KoR to keep them tapped.

  3. #603
    Member
    Valtrix's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2008
    Location

    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts

    1,118

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Darkenslight View Post
    In Modern, it still counters almost everything of relevance, creature-wise. In Standard, it's gonna be nuts.
    Remember that modern already has Essence Scatter, so the new devoid counter with CMC restrictions is just pointless in terms of Modern.
    Playing Punishing Regular Miracles.

    Contribute to the community Miracles Primer.

  4. #604

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Dissection View Post
    Nice, thanks.

    EDIT: Do you know roughly how far back the discussion was? Would save me going through each page.
    It's basically an old ruling. You can search for "Void Maw" and "Yawgmoth's Will".

    Edit: Maw/Will got ruled out, so it becomes a new object in exile.

  5. #605
    Sushi or Meat and Eggs
    Cire's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Posts

    2,263

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by rufus View Post
    Retreat to Coralhelm + Knight of the Reliquary

    Seems like it could be silly. Pump the knight. Use fetchlands for extra retreat triggers to tap down their creatures, and fetch the blue land with KoR to keep them tapped.
    Not janky enough! We need Land Tax

  6. #606

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Cire View Post
    Not janky enough! We need Land Tax
    Did somebody say BANT Lands?!

  7. #607
    bruizar
    Guest

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Cire View Post
    Not janky enough! We need Land Tax
    Abolish

  8. #608
    Sushi or Meat and Eggs
    Cire's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Posts

    2,263

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Also fun useless 3 card combo with Retreat to Coralhelm

    1st turn - Land - Hedron Crab
    2nd turn - Land - Ruin Ghost
    3rd turn - 2 mana Land - Retreat to Coralhelm - exile land - etb - untap Ruin Ghost - repeat - mill opponent

    Hey Modern friendly !

    (or use Steppe Lynx for infinite attack power. . .)

  9. #609

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Too bad every modern deck plays 1 mana removals for creatures and/or enchantments :/
    “Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.

  10. #610

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by QBChaz View Post
    2B

    When ETB, kill target Delver/DRS/Mother

    3/2
    IMO, most B/x midrange decks will prefer Liliana. Still, it stands out as one of the most interesting designs we've seen in this set so far.

  11. #611
    get outta here, humanity.
    iamajellydonut's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2009
    Location

    Butugychag
    Posts

    2,031

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by DLifshitz View Post
    IMO, most B/x midrange decks will prefer Liliana. Still, it stands out as one of the most interesting designs we've seen in this set so far.
    I mean, sure, they have similar mana costs, but it's not like a deck can't have more than one kill spell. Liliana has to be run in moderation because of the legend rule, and this will have to be run in moderation because it's conditional. The way I see it, the cards work out just fine together.
    Quote Originally Posted by sdematt View Post
    tits.

  12. #612
    Sushi or Meat and Eggs
    Cire's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Posts

    2,263

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by HdH_Cthulhu View Post
    Too bad every modern deck plays 1 mana removals for creatures and/or enchantments :/
    Hahaha definitely not tier one

  13. #613

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Cire View Post
    ...
    Hey Modern friendly !

    (or use Steppe Lynx for infinite attack power. . .)
    I understand it's off topic,but I do wonder if there are enough good 'tap' creatures like Jace, Noble Hierach, and Knight of the Reliquary to make Return to Coralhelm worthwhile in Modern.

    T1, Noble Hiearch, T2, Knight of the Reliquary, T3 Return to Coralhelm, swing for 20.

  14. #614

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    I tried a janky brew of it with Tideforce Elemental in WWK during that standard which obviously didnt work as well.

  15. #615
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by rufus View Post
    I understand it's off topic,but I do wonder if there are enough good 'tap' creatures like Jace, Noble Hierach, and Knight of the Reliquary to make Return to Coralhelm worthwhile in Modern.

    T1, Noble Hiearch, T2, Knight of the Reliquary, T3 Return to Coralhelm, swing for 20.
    Hangarback Walker seems like another good tap guy.

    I'm interested to see the manabase that enables those shenanigans since fetches and sac fodder needs to be kinda balanced.

    A manabase with actual duals in Legacy could generate quite a bit mana from the fetched lands as well. Sunhome, Fortress of the Legion or Kessig Wolf Run could cover the last points of damage. Or you could generate mana and go Thespian's Stage + Dark Depths + Slayers' Stronghold for hasty Marit Lage tokens out of fucking nowhere. Probably needs some serious theorycrafting to get the numbers and sequencing right, though. Call me intrigued.

  16. #616
    Member
    ReAnimator's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2005
    Location

    Toronto Canada
    Posts

    599

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by rufus View Post
    I understand it's off topic,but I do wonder if there are enough good 'tap' creatures like Jace, Noble Hierach, and Knight of the Reliquary to make Return to Coralhelm worthwhile in Modern.

    T1, Noble Hiearch, T2, Knight of the Reliquary, T3 Return to Coralhelm, swing for 20.
    This really does seem worth talking about there is a lot of power here.
    This adds a lot of mana to your pool as every fetch you search up can add an extra mana off a Hierarch, and all the lands you are fetching with knight are giving you mana as well, so the turn you go off you have as much mana as you could want. Also there isn't any need to give knight or lynx whatever evasion as you can tap down blockers with every fetch you get (since you get a free activation that you don't need to use on knight).

    The fact that this isn't just a do nothing combo piece but can actually scry you to good cards or offensively or defensively tap a bunch of opposing creatures isn't worth nothing either. Without a knight this enchantment essentially turns your mana dorks into Lotus Cobras.

    Seems totally possible for a modern deck. Already there is a Knight of the Reliquary Naya deck that has put up a lot of results, not hard to think that a Bant version could be viable.

  17. #617

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Barook View Post
    ... Or you could generate mana and go Thespian's Stage + Dark Depths + Slayers' Stronghold for hasty Marit Lage tokens out of fucking nowhere ...
    Depths is banned in modern, Eye of Ugin is legal though and can do things if there's piles of mana available. Alterantively There's a bunch of stuff that could happen in legacy with DRS and such.

  18. #618

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by iamajellydonut View Post
    I mean, sure, they have similar mana costs, but it's not like a deck can't have more than one kill spell.
    That is true. Actually, I think that a Legacy deck wanting to make use of Strangler would have to play StP as well as DRS in order for there to be exiled cards. Without StP, you'd be relying mostly on your own DRS, and your opponent's FoW and Delve spells. I dunno, I want this card to be playable, but I the way I see it, its conditionality and being in competition with Liliana don't bode well.

    Speaking of other removal: Bolt or StP backed up with Snapcaster also feel so much better and versatile, even if they don't have the advantage of Devoid.

  19. #619
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by rufus View Post
    Depths is banned in modern, Eye of Ugin is legal though and can do things if there's piles of mana available. Alterantively There's a bunch of stuff that could happen in legacy with DRS and such.
    I was talking about Legacy. Sunhome/Kessig Wolf Run are probably the better solutions since they take 1 slot max, depending on what you want to run.

    Anybody interested in doing the math for a proper sequence for either Sunhome or Kessig (<-- which might be better since you can't chump Knight anymore) to go for the kill? It would be nice to know how feasible it actually is.

  20. #620

    Re: [BFZ]Battle for Zendikar spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Barook View Post
    I was talking about Legacy. Sunhome/Kessig Wolf Run are probably the better solutions since they take 1 slot max, depending on what you want to run.

    Anybody interested in doing the math for a proper sequence for either Sunhome or Kessig (<-- which might be better since you can't chump Knight anymore) to go for the kill? It would be nice to know how feasible it actually is.
    Just with kessig, each land you cycle through gives the knight +1/+1 by being in the graveyard, and 1 mana for the kessig activation. The knights 2 power offsets the 2 activation cost of Kessig, so that's 10 lands total. With Kessig + Sunhome, you can cycle through 7. So you probably want at least 10 forests or plains that come into play untapped in the deck so that you can start with 3 lands in play and cycle 7 without having to use fetchlands.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)