Page 37 of 49 FirstFirst ... 2733343536373839404147 ... LastLast
Results 721 to 740 of 970

Thread: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

  1. #721

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by rufus View Post
    I think it's one of those things where it ends up being a much bigger issue in limited than constructed formats.
    I'd be surprised if Wizards toned down the manlands because of Limited. In my experience (~30 drafts), Awakening a manland is a high-risk, high-reward play. A 5/6, or larger, lifelink Shambling Vents is capable of brutal swings in the life total difference, but Awaken strips away the resilience to most forms of removal that manlands are valued for. Sure, they'll do dirty things if they aren't met with an answer (of which there are plenty at Common), but the same can be said of so many cards in Limited. Bombs have always existed in Limited.

    I think the power shrivel had more to do with Constructed formats, especially Standard. WotC has, for better or worse, been pushing for a Standard format in which efficient threats are numerous and comprehensive removal is either expensive or virtually nonexistent in certain decks. Powerful manlands would just be another difficult to counter threat alongside Rhinos, Hangarbacks, Ojutais, Wingmate Rocs, Gideons, and whatnot—difficult threats that could be a bit too ubiquitous given their mana-producing roles.

    What disappointed me about this batch of manlands wasn't the power level, though, it's the lack of interesting designs. Four out of five of the BFZ manlands are extremely close to the RTR/GTC Keyrune cycle when you look at their animated forms, only the U/R representatives of the cycles having divergent designs. Just slap a keyword common to both colors on the creature form and call it good...lazy. I wanted to see more designs in the vein of Raging Ravine, Celestial Colonnade, and Lavaclaw Reaches (not just about power, folks)...stuff that feels unique and fun to build with.

    Aaaaand enough about manlands, thoughts on Oath of Ashaya and Last Word 2: Electric Surge-a-loo:

    -Oath of Nissa is yet another Green cantrip/dig-spell in the vein of Ancient Stirrings, Seek the Wilds, Gather the Pack, Kruphix's Insight, Commune with the Gods and Lead the Stampede. I like these designs a lot, as they mandate certain deckbuilding considerations and don't play well en masse (they can't chain into each other a la Blue cantrips/selection). Like its forebearers, Oath of Nissa is not good in Legacy—it's a shitty Mirri's Guile—but it certainly portends of interesting future designs.

    -Overwhelming Denial is okay, I guess. When hardcast, it's better than Last Word, but very few decks, even in EDH, want that effect. It's Surge cost will be restricted, in most cases, to a couple scenarios:

    1. When trying to protect a combo/play, in which case free countermagic, Flusterstorm, and even something like Spell Pierce is probably a better choice.

    2. When digging for an answer with a cantrip or draw spell in which case it becomes an uncounterable Counterspell. Nice, I guess, but I can't see where any deck would rather have something cheaper like the examples in scenario number one.

    Maybe it will be good at breaking control mirrors in Standard via winning counter wars, I dunno, but it looks underwhelming to me.

  2. #722
    Some dipshit of a Moderator.
    Dice_Box's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2013
    Location

    A Tabernacle in some random Valley.
    Posts

    4,843

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    If the flavour text is true, I want to know who summoned Phelddagrif.

    The Manlands really suck. The G/B one will see Modern play but that R/U one... ouch. And it is more complex than most cards that are made today. It dies to a bolt regardless and I know I am going to get into a fight over that.
    It is better to ask and look stupid then keep your mouth shut and remain so.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spam View Post
    Do not make fun of lands masters, they've spent many years mastering the punishing fire technique in the secret loam monastery. Do not mistake them with the miracles masters, eternal rivals, they won't like it.
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    I hope your afterlife is filled with eternal torment.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dice_Box View Post
    Fuck. Which one of my quotes do I drop for this?
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    Something about how fun it is pulling the wings off flies and microwaving the neighbors cat?

  3. #723

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamaican Zombie Legend View Post
    ...

    -Overwhelming Denial is okay, I guess. When hardcast, it's better than Last Word, but very few decks, even in EDH, want that effect. It's Surge cost will be restricted, in most cases, to a couple scenarios:

    ..
    It seems like it could be a good card for control mirrors - strong in counter wars or in the late game when you want to counter Terminus. Probably a sideboard card at best in legacy though.

  4. #724
    plays Mountains
    Ace/Homebrew's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2011
    Location

    Philadelphia Area
    Posts

    2,257

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Dice_Box View Post
    If the flavour text is true, I want to know who summoned Phelddagrif.
    Quote Originally Posted by Annorax from MtGS
    Yes, I wrote the flavor text. We do this on one or two cards a set now to discourage other sites (coughMythicspoilercough) from stealing the mockups.
    source

    S'funny how a conditionally better Counterspell is just a worse Counterspell.

  5. #725
    Sushi or Meat and Eggs
    Cire's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Posts

    2,263

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    I'm slightly miffed that the Green Landlord does exactly the same thing as the Red one except gives vigilance instead of trample. Like I know that vigilance on a manland changes a lot, but they could have at least changed the P/T of the elementals or something. . . .

  6. #726

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    It's way too janky for legacy, but there's a bad combo with Wake the Dead and a suitable creature pile that includes Sifter of Souls.

  7. #727
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Cire View Post
    I'm slightly miffed that the Green Landlord does exactly the same thing as the Red one except gives vigilance instead of trample. Like I know that vigilance on a manland changes a lot, but they could have at least changed the P/T of the elementals or something. . . .
    I'd expect first strike for white, flying for blue and lifelink/deathtouch for black. It's an uncommon cycle, so meh.

  8. #728
    plays Mountains
    Ace/Homebrew's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2011
    Location

    Philadelphia Area
    Posts

    2,257

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Boring day for spoilers, it seems.



    Gavin Verhey also acted like nobody saw Kozilek's Return weeks ago.

  9. #729

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Ace/Homebrew View Post
    Boring day for spoilers, it seems.



    Gavin Verhey also acted like nobody saw Kozilek's Return weeks ago.
    Oath of Gideon is an intresting card... not a card that I see making waves in legacy, but it is intresting.

  10. #730
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Oath of Gideon might not be Legacy-material, but it's still a decent card. I like how it's on-curve and buffs BFZ Gideon to the point where you could ult immediately have him survive to pump out more tokens.

  11. #731
    GrimGrin and Glissa are in a boat...

    Join Date

    Jan 2013
    Location

    French Riviera
    Posts

    1,224

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Just by curiosity, what if you have doubling season and oath of gideon in play? How would the effect apply? First on the battlefield applied first?

  12. #732
    Member
    from Cairo's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    RI
    Posts

    1,093

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Oath of Gideon making a couple dorks that in turn can protect a Planeswalker the following turn is pretty synergistic. I assume the wording works on the transform walkers too? If so it's cool for curving Jace, VP into Oath of Gideon into another 'walker.
    TPDMC

  13. #733
    All the copies target you.
    thefringthing's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2011
    Location

    Kitchener, Ontario
    Posts

    574

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Transform cards go to exile and then enter the battlefield again back-face up when they transform, so this does work with transform planeswalkers.
    "I'm willing to imagine a TES where Past in Flames replaces Ill-Gotten Gains entirely, and we just don't play Diminishing Returns." - me, 29/09/2011
    Founding member of Team Scrubbad: Legacy Legends

  14. #734

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by from Cairo View Post
    Oath of Gideon making a couple dorks that in turn can protect a Planeswalker the following turn is pretty synergistic. I assume the wording works on the transform walkers too? If so it's cool for curving Jace, VP into Oath of Gideon into another 'walker.
    It works with flip walkers.

    I doubt it's legacy material. Talking in terms of standard: It also makes makes two sidekicks for Kitheon. Flip Jace and Ob Nixils get an extra use of their minus ability from it.

    There's also immediate ults with Tezzeret (but not much in the way of other synergies.)

  15. #735

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Tylert View Post
    Just by curiosity, what if you have doubling season and oath of gideon in play? How would the effect apply? First on the battlefield applied first?
    You control both sources of the replacement effects and the perm it would affect, so I think you get to choose the order that the replacement effects are applied in.

    - Not a Judge, so take it with a grain of salt for now.

  16. #736

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Friend of mine has already picked up his foiled playset of Ceaseless Searblades for the combo with the UR manland. 30 cents apiece, woo.

  17. #737

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by square_two View Post
    Friend of mine has already picked up his foiled playset of Ceaseless Searblades for the combo with the UR manland. 30 cents apiece, woo.
    Best of luck. This combo already existed with Lavaclaw Reaches, and Searblades was still a quarter per foil. So....

  18. #738
    Sushi or Meat and Eggs
    Cire's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Posts

    2,263

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread


  19. #739
    Sushi or Meat and Eggs
    Cire's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Posts

    2,263

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by MaximumC View Post
    Best of luck. This combo already existed with Lavaclaw Reaches, and Searblades was still a quarter per foil. So....
    but now you can run both for 8 combo cards which makes the combo much more consistent.

  20. #740

    Re: [OGW] Oath of the Gatewatch spoilers thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Cire View Post
    but now you can run both for 8 combo cards which makes the combo much more consistent.
    Yeah, it's still a 2-card, 3R combo that wins only if you can attack unblocked with a non-sick creature with 1 toughness. Cute for Cube and EDH, but I'm not betting on this for Modern. The only thing it's got going for it is that the manlands are not terrible on their own.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)