Brainstorm
Force of Will
Lion's Eye Diamond
Counterbalance
Sensei's Divining Top
Tarmogoyf
Phyrexian Dreadnaught
Goblin Lackey
Standstill
Natural Order
Happy about Eye (not Temple) ban. Slept on Visions and Thopter. Oops. Golem seems a bit harsh right after Chalice but I'm not a Shops player.
Bummer about Lodestone. I haven't played Vintage since last summer, but Shops was my deck when I did.
Still, on days like today it feels good to play Legacy.
This is one of the best announcements I've seen in a long time; if Top was on there it'd probably have been perfect.
Restricting Golem was a really shitty move. Super disappointed.
Supremacy 2020 is the modern era game of nuclear brinksmanship! My blog:
https://fieldmarshalshandbook.wordpress.com
You can play Lands.dec in EDH too! My primer:
http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/t...lara-lands-dec
I think on some level this kind of thing has to be done, with very close attention to statistics, for a deck that uses 4x Black Lotus: the land (in a format where we want to see 4 copies of workshops). The real question is whether or not 4/10 possible common taxing lock pieces [4x sphere, 4x thorn, 1x lode, 1x 3ball] moving to Sphere of Resistance is too much for the mana base to sustain (honestly it might be with the reemergence of crucible/standstill decks). I don't think it's all doom and gloom for shops in the long run, yes it's probably too severe in the short run, but I'm thinking a restriction like this opens the door for R&D to print a different type of taxing artifact (that will get restricted, but will ultimately help define the optimal/healthy number of viable taxers for the shops archetype).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)