Page 14 of 103 FirstFirst ... 41011121314151617182464 ... LastLast
Results 261 to 280 of 2044

Thread: Obligatory shitty card creation thread

  1. #261
    2224 players? Count me there!
    SilverGreen's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2006
    Location

    Rio de Janeiro
    Posts

    240

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Right, but very unlike. The MtG standard for 3 red damage has actually a CMC2, with CMC1 being the exception to the rule (the case of Lightning Bolt in current T2, the limited Lava Spike, or Rift Bolt), and for 4 dmg it gravitates towards CMC3 (when the card is pushed, and always with a drawback associated, as in Char and that Shadowmoor RRR instant) and 4 (with the default being the simple Lightning Blast). Adding a mere point of damage dealing to a card involves a much more different math than add a point of life gain. That's the same premise that makes a point of creature power much more onerous in terms of costs than a point of toughness. The reason is simple: damage shortens the game, as life gaining prolongs it, and the later is more likely to afford interactivity than the former.
    Tapping lands and watching the sky falling since 1995.
    -------------------------------------------------------
    FeFe Team - Fame, girls and Mox Diamonds
    AHHHHHHH MULHEK!!!!

    -------------------------------------------------------
    Elen Síla Lúmenn Ommentielvo!

  2. #262
    Noachide'
    MMogg's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2009
    Location

    Dongying, China
    Posts

    1,048

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Quote Originally Posted by SilverGreen View Post
    Right, but very unlike. The MtG standard for 3 red damage has actually a CMC2, with CMC1 being the exception to the rule (the case of Lightning Bolt in current T2, the limited Lava Spike, or Rift Bolt), and for 4 dmg it gravitates towards CMC3 (when the card is pushed, and always with a drawback associated, as in Char and that Shadowmoor RRR instant) and 4 (with the default being the simple Lightning Blast). Adding a mere point of damage dealing to a card involves a much more different math than add a point of life gain. That's the same premise that makes a point of creature power much more onerous in terms of costs than a point of toughness. The reason is simple: damage shortens the game, as life gaining prolongs it, and the later is more likely to afford interactivity than the former.
    Exactly! Just as Lightning Bolt is the exception, this card too could be an exception. As I said just before, it's high time red also gets some better burn. I mean, if Wizards cared so much about math and standards, they should realize a 3/4, 4/5 or 5/6 for is crazy. My proposed burn spell is not crazy. It's solid, but not broken or crazy.
    Who says the Internet isn't full of <3?
    Quote Originally Posted by Aleksandr View Post
    MMogg, I love you more and more.
    Quote Originally Posted by menace13
    MMogg is already loved any place he goes.

  3. #263
    Alan Shore
    Alecthar's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2009
    Location

    We're not territorial about that sort of thing, are we?
    Posts

    9

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Quote Originally Posted by MMogg View Post
    Sure!

    Kiss of Lightning
    Instant

    Kiss of Lightning deals 4 damage to target creature or player.

    So, pretty much a 4 dmg Lightning Bolt for an extra .
    The only cards I know of that deal this much damage for that cost are limited, possess a significant drawback, or both. If I recall correctly, Flame Javelin was fairly notable as giving you a drawbackless (assuming the triple red is no problem) 4 damage for 3 mana. It's obviously cheaper, it interacts like 10 times better with cards that search for cards based on converted mana cost and it's really great with Cascade (Bloodbraid Elf into Kiss of Lightning is alright). It's an interesting card, given that it's pretty much strictly better than Flame Javelin (in theory, Javelin has a few advantages, such as the ability to play it with varying color investments and the fact that it won't be CounterTopped or Spell Snared). But I honestly think it wouldn't see much play in Legacy, simply because it costs 2 Red, and I think it would probably be too good in Type 2, and maybe Extended (depending on what's legal at the time). Not to mention that, even at uncommon, it would be nonsensically good in Limited, assuming Red was even vaguely competent.

    I may be overselling the Limited part, but seriously, it would be pretty good.
    Quote Originally Posted by Aldo
    Nothing says "bitch please" like a wall of fire.

  4. #264
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Quote Originally Posted by MMogg View Post
    Sure!

    Kiss of Lightning
    Instant

    Kiss of Lightning deals 4 damage to target creature or player.

    So, pretty much a 4 dmg Lightning Bolt for an extra .
    Alecthar has a point that it might be a tad to good compared to other spells. However, would it be a fairer card if it was a sorcery?

  5. #265
    Member

    Join Date

    Apr 2009
    Location

    Sweden, Trelleborg
    Posts

    816

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Quote Originally Posted by Barook View Post
    Alecthar has a point that it might be a tad to good compared to other spells. However, would it be a fairer card if it was a sorcery?
    It could however just do 3 damage on players while doing 4 or even 5 to creatures.

  6. #266
    They call me a slob, but I do my job...
    Cthuloo's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2009
    Location

    Back to the city by the sea, blowin' in the wind, fighting with hordes of retired people
    Posts

    274

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Quote Originally Posted by Rizso View Post
    It could however just do 3 damage on players while doing 4 or even 5 to creatures.
    If the purpose is to be able to get easily rid of a goyf it could be like:

    Tarmobolt RR
    Instant

    Tarmobolt deals 3 damage to target player or 5 damage to target creature without flying.

  7. #267
    ..sry, whut? ◔̯◔
    Humphrey's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2008
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    730

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    It wouldnt be an instant I guess, but I like it
    sick limited stuff nontheless
    Got tired of Legacy and you like drafts? Try my Paupercube What?

  8. #268
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Italy, Eternal
    Posts

    1,848

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Why so limited?

    Avalanche 1RR
    Sorcery
    Destroy target creature withouth flying or target land.

    Go imba.

  9. #269

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Tireless Sliver GW

    Creature - Sliver

    All Slivers have Persist

    2/2

    Something to give Sliver Tribal both an out vs Tarmogoyf and Sweepers while annoying the piss out of Goblins.
    Quote Originally Posted by wastedlife View Post
    Breathweapon, I regret saying this but ... I've been liking you more and more every day.

  10. #270
    Etherium is limited. Innovation is not.
    Hanni's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Columbus, OH
    Posts

    2,838

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Tireless Sliver GW

    Creature - Sliver

    All Slivers have Persist

    2/2

    Something to give Sliver Tribal both an out vs Tarmogoyf and Sweepers while annoying the piss out of Goblins.
    That... is... awesome.

  11. #271

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Quote Originally Posted by BreathWeapon View Post
    Tireless Sliver GW

    Creature - Sliver

    All Slivers have Persist

    2/2

    Something to give Sliver Tribal both an out vs Tarmogoyf and Sweepers while annoying the piss out of Goblins.
    Add...

    Broodmother Sliver 1GG

    Creature - Sliver

    All slivers gain: "Whenever another sliver comes into play, put a +1/+1 counter on ~this~"

    2/2



    And you would have broken the format in half!

    (sadly it has to cost 3 at a min, as it would be broken as fuck at 2cc, still 3cc is not bad, even if it means we can't vial it in...)

  12. #272
    Etherium is limited. Innovation is not.
    Hanni's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Columbus, OH
    Posts

    2,838

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Day of Judgement
    3WW
    Split Second
    Destroy all creatures. They cannot be regenerated.

    God is Calling
    3BB
    Split Second
    Destroy all creatures. They cannot be regenerated.

    Obsolete
    2WB
    Split Second
    Destroy target permanent.

  13. #273
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Quote Originally Posted by Hanni View Post
    That... is... awesome.
    This

    Another idea:

    Planar Voidmage
    Creature - Human Wizard
    If a card would be put into a graveyard from anywhere, remove it from the game instead.
    1/1

    It's basically an upgraded Planar Void with a fragile body.

  14. #274
    Etherium is limited. Innovation is not.
    Hanni's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Columbus, OH
    Posts

    2,838

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    The Advisor
    1B
    Creature - Human Wizard
    Flying
    At the beginning of your upkeep, reveal the top card of your library and put that card into your hand. You lose life equal to its converted mana cost.
    1/1

    Fixed.

  15. #275

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Rusted Sliver



    All slivers have Whither


    2/2

  16. #276
    Team Moosebite
    Volrath's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2009
    Location

    Oudega,tiny village in the Netherlands
    Posts

    104

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Vigilant Sliver

    Creature - Sliver

    All sliver creatures have vigilance

    Like a bee, it protects it's hive
    Like a bee, it seeks food for the Queen and it's hive.
    Unlike a bee, it seems to do it at the same time.

    Skyshroud ranger


    2/2



    Spiketail Sliver

    Creature - Sliver

    All sliver creatures have: ''Sacrifice this creature : counter target spell unless it controler pays ''

    Like a bee, it stings only when threathened and dies
    Unlike a bee, it stings raw magic and dissolves it.

    Skyshroud Ranger


    1/1



    Shielding Sliver

    All sliver creatures get +0/+1

    All Sliver Creatures have "Sacrifice this creature: return target creature to owners hand"'

    Like a bee, it....

    Skyshroud Ranger, last words


    1/1




    Hypnotic Sliver

    Creature - Sliver

    All slive creatures have ''tap: tap target creature''

    I know i have made several compairisons of bees and slivers in the past, but i never have seen a bee doing that..

    Skyshroud ranger


    2/2
    If there is such a thing as too much power, I have not discovered it.” —Volrath

    Founding father of Team Moosebite, the team that really bites.

  17. #277

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Quote Originally Posted by MMogg View Post
    Exactly! Just as Lightning Bolt is the exception, this card too could be an exception. As I said just before, it's high time red also gets some better burn.
    I really don't think it is, red has always had good burn printed for it, compared to, oh, I don't know, White's Life Gain. They just reprinted Lightning Bolt- Red Burn is fine. We already have a semi-viable Mono Red Burn deck, and frankly its one of the least interesting and most tiresome decks ever and there's no reason on earth to push that archetype.

  18. #278
    Noachide'
    MMogg's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2009
    Location

    Dongying, China
    Posts

    1,048

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Quote Originally Posted by FieryBalrog View Post
    I really don't think it is, red has always had good burn printed for it, compared to, oh, I don't know, White's Life Gain. They just reprinted Lightning Bolt- Red Burn is fine. We already have a semi-viable Mono Red Burn deck, and frankly its one of the least interesting and most tiresome decks ever and there's no reason on earth to push that archetype.
    I wasn't referring to burn as a deck type, I was referring to the utility. Life gain has always sucked because it isn't removal and it isn't really necessary since white has the best spot removal in the game. Also Swords to Plowshares just got an update with Path to Exile. That's 8 instant speed removal. Red has the same old lame 3 dmg spells it has had since 1994. The fact that they reprinted Lightning Bolt after saying they never would (and Shock had become the norm for ) just goes to show how little impact Lightning Bolt has nowadays. Heck, in Legacy even Incinerate isn't played, so I don't see why a 2cc 4 damage spell is somehow not worth considering.

    Anyway, I'm extremely biased since I <3 .
    Who says the Internet isn't full of <3?
    Quote Originally Posted by Aleksandr View Post
    MMogg, I love you more and more.
    Quote Originally Posted by menace13
    MMogg is already loved any place he goes.

  19. #279

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    One card I'm surprised they haven't made is very simple: or cantrip Edict.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bardo View Post
    Matt, basically everything you said turned out to be true.
    TeamReflection || noitcelfeRmaeT

    My MOTL sale list

  20. #280
    Amen, brotha.
    Nidd's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2009
    Location

    Bamberg / Franconia / Bavaria / Germany
    Posts

    615

    Re: Cards you'd like to see WotC print for Eternal reasons

    Quote Originally Posted by MattH View Post
    One card I'm surprised they haven't made is very simple: or cantrip Edict.
    You realize this would be pushing the 2-for-1 theme of Jund in Standard even further?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)