View Poll Results: Most bannable card in Legacy? (not that they will touch it)

Voters
192. You may not vote on this poll
  • Brainstorm

    16 8.33%
  • Force of Will

    4 2.08%
  • Lion's Eye Diamond

    35 18.23%
  • Counterbalance

    34 17.71%
  • Sensei's Divining Top

    103 53.65%
  • Tarmogoyf

    46 23.96%
  • Phyrexian Dreadnaught

    2 1.04%
  • Goblin Lackey

    4 2.08%
  • Standstill

    6 3.13%
  • Natural Order

    8 4.17%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 359 of 1183 FirstFirst ... 259309349355356357358359360361362363369409459859 ... LastLast
Results 7,161 to 7,180 of 23644

Thread: All B/R update speculation.

  1. #7161

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Seth View Post
    I think shutting down Sneak and Show was kind of the point, heh.

    But if you want it to only hit Show and Tell decks, you could try "cards can't enter the battlefield from players' hands." (obviously there would be reminder text to specify that casting a creature makes it enter from the stack) That turns off both Show and Tell and Sneak Attack.
    Yeah, because that would be really freakin' fair to vial. Jesus, think it through.

    Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

  2. #7162

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Secretly.A.Bee View Post
    Yeah, because that would be really freakin' fair to vial. Jesus, think it through.
    Okay, I overlooked something. No need to get angry about it.

  3. #7163

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Wasn't meant as anger. Sorry, I can see how it came off as that, though.

    Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

  4. #7164
    Member
    Dzra's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Location

    Plano, Texas
    Posts

    911

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Hm, forgot about Aether Vial. I wonder if there is a way to word around it.

  5. #7165
    Some dipshit of a Moderator.
    Dice_Box's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2013
    Location

    A Tabernacle in some random Valley.
    Posts

    4,843

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dzra View Post
    Hm, forgot about Aether Vial. I wonder if there is a way to word around it.
    http://gatherer.wizards.com/pages/Ca...iverseid=40545
    It is better to ask and look stupid then keep your mouth shut and remain so.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spam View Post
    Do not make fun of lands masters, they've spent many years mastering the punishing fire technique in the secret loam monastery. Do not mistake them with the miracles masters, eternal rivals, they won't like it.
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    I hope your afterlife is filled with eternal torment.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dice_Box View Post
    Fuck. Which one of my quotes do I drop for this?
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    Something about how fun it is pulling the wings off flies and microwaving the neighbors cat?

  6. #7166

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Based on the current decks for February the point cutoff to be in the DTB thread is going to be 60.8 points. Elves will barely sneak in there to keep it from being a non-brainstorm shutout.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bed Decks Palyer View Post
    ______________________________________________
    Hatelizard That Touches Itself
    Legendary Creature — Lizard Mystic Praetor

    : ~ gets +2/+2 and flanking until end of turn.
    Activate this ability only once each turn.

    If a non-land permanent would enter the battlefield,
    if that permanent's controller didn't cast it from his hand,
    put that permanent into that owner's graveyard instead.
    ___________________________________________2/2
    Change the activated ability to "Exalted, Flanking" and you have yourself a deal.

  7. #7167
    Member
    AngryTroll's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2004
    Location

    College Station, TX
    Posts

    2,629

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Top 16 for SCG Atlanta:

    Quote Originally Posted by SCG Atlanta
    RUG Delver
    UWR Stoneblade
    BUG Delver
    Infect
    UWR Miracles
    Esper Stoneblade
    Goblins
    Shardless BUG

    Esper Stoneblade
    Reanimator
    Painted Stone
    Punishing Jund
    Esper Deathblade
    BUG Delver
    Reanimator
    Reanimator
    Eight different decks in the Top 8, 12 different decks in the Top 16.
    7/8 and 13/16 use Brainstorm
    7/8 and 13/16 use Force of Will
    5/16 use Stoneforge Mystic
    4/16 use Delver
    4/16 use True-Name Nemesis
    5-ish combo decks: Reanimator x3, Painted Stone, Infect
    Control: 1 UWR Miracles
    Tempo: 1 RUG Delver
    Tempo/Midrange decks (tough category, but ranges from tempo-heavy to midrange-heavy): 2 BUG Delver, 1 UWR Stoneblade, 1 Shardless BUG, 1 Punishing Jund, 2 Esper Stoneblade, 1 Esper Deathblade, 1 Goblins

    The Top 16 is overwhelmingly blue-heavy, with Brainstorm and Force in 13/16 decks. On the other hand, Brainstorm is played alongside pure tempo decks (RUG), pure midrange decks (Shardless), tempo-y midrange-y decks, control decks, and combo decks.

    That Top 16 is simultaneously extremely diverse and extremely blue heavy. To me this seems very typical of Legacy.
    InfoNinjas

  8. #7168
    (' ' '\( 0 ,o)/''')
    TheInfamousBearAssassin's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2004
    Location

    Northern Virginia
    Posts

    6,705

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    I mean it's mostly Stoneforge and/or Delver based aggro-control lists. Really not that diverse. Or we wouldn't have considered it so in old Legacy, where a top 8 that was 6/8 Thresh wasn't diverse just because RUG, BUG and WUG were all equally represented.

    Do you mean it's typical of modern Legacy or Legacy traditionally? I'll agree it's typical of what gets passed off as diversity these days.
    For my confessions, they burned me with fire/
    And found I was for endurance made

  9. #7169

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    Do you mean it's typical of modern Legacy or Legacy traditionally? I'll agree it's typical of what gets passed off as diversity these days.
    Yep

  10. #7170

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Phage being put into play via Aether Vial still loses you the game.

  11. #7171
    Some dipshit of a Moderator.
    Dice_Box's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2013
    Location

    A Tabernacle in some random Valley.
    Posts

    4,843

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    That was the point I was making.
    It is better to ask and look stupid then keep your mouth shut and remain so.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spam View Post
    Do not make fun of lands masters, they've spent many years mastering the punishing fire technique in the secret loam monastery. Do not mistake them with the miracles masters, eternal rivals, they won't like it.
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    I hope your afterlife is filled with eternal torment.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dice_Box View Post
    Fuck. Which one of my quotes do I drop for this?
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthVicious View Post
    Something about how fun it is pulling the wings off flies and microwaving the neighbors cat?

  12. #7172
    Member
    AngryTroll's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2004
    Location

    College Station, TX
    Posts

    2,629

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    I mean it's mostly Stoneforge and/or Delver based aggro-control lists. Really not that diverse. Or we wouldn't have considered it so in old Legacy, where a top 8 that was 6/8 Thresh wasn't diverse just because RUG, BUG and WUG were all equally represented.

    Do you mean it's typical of modern Legacy or Legacy traditionally? I'll agree it's typical of what gets passed off as diversity these days.
    It's only 7/16 Delver or Stoneforge, for what that's worth.

    By "old Legacy", do you mean pre-TNN, or do you mean pre-Tarmogoyf, or somewhere in the middle? I want to make sure I answer the right question, and "Thresh" makes me think of Mystic Enforcer vs. Fledgling Dragon. I wasn't being super specific, but I guess the blue-ness of this Top 16 is more extreme than I can remember. However, the SCG Open in St. Louis was 10/16 blue decks.

    I'd be really curious to see how the breakdown of Top 8s by deck type has changed over time. How much of a presence were Jund and Maverick back in their heydays? Did the format shift away from Jund with the printing of TNN, or was it before TNN was printed? My gut feeling is that Jund died down long before TNN was spoiled, but I don't have hard data for that.
    InfoNinjas

  13. #7173
    Win or lose, it begins with...
    Arsenal's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts

    2,184

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by AngryTroll View Post
    I'd be really curious to see how the breakdown of Top 8s by deck type has changed over time. How much of a presence were Jund and Maverick back in their heydays? Did the format shift away from Jund with the printing of TNN, or was it before TNN was printed? My gut feeling is that Jund died down long before TNN was spoiled, but I don't have hard data for that.
    From Jan-Oct 2013, Jund was #3 and Maverick was #7.
    Discussing the impact of True-Name Nemesis on Legacy:

    Quote Originally Posted by 2Rach View Post
    And format warping itself isn't necessarily a bad thing for that matter.

  14. #7174
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,533

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by AngryTroll View Post
    That Top 16 is simultaneously extremely diverse and extremely blue heavy. To me this seems very typical of Legacy.
    I don't remember blue consistently putting up results in the 75+% range.

    Quote Originally Posted by AngryTroll View Post
    I'd be really curious to see how the breakdown of Top 8s by deck type has changed over time. How much of a presence were Jund and Maverick back in their heydays? Did the format shift away from Jund with the printing of TNN, or was it before TNN was printed? My gut feeling is that Jund died down long before TNN was spoiled, but I don't have hard data for that.
    Jund was pretty much destroyed by TNN. It's Maverick that died down long before TNN.

  15. #7175
    Win or lose, it begins with...
    Arsenal's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts

    2,184

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Barook View Post
    It's Maverick that died down long before TNN.
    I've gone through the data, and this is a common misconception that is just wrong. I went back and looked at the Top 8's from all 33+ player tourneys (6 round minimum) from Jan-Oct 2013 and Maverick was #7 during that pre-TNN era. #7 isn't exactly super duper top tier, but it's certainly a far cry from "dead" as so many think it was pre-TNN.
    Discussing the impact of True-Name Nemesis on Legacy:

    Quote Originally Posted by 2Rach View Post
    And format warping itself isn't necessarily a bad thing for that matter.

  16. #7176
    Joe Cool Above All
    HSCK's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Posts

    664

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal View Post
    I've gone through the data, and this is a common misconception that is just wrong. I went back and looked at the Top 8's from all 33+ player tourneys (6 round minimum) from Jan-Oct 2013 and Maverick was #7 during that pre-TNN era. #7 isn't exactly super duper top tier, but it's certainly a far cry from "dead" as so many think it was pre-TNN.
    Just curious, have you compared its total results vs. 8+ round tournaments, I think its lack of success in that aspect is what drives the narrative that it was "dead." Also, posted my February numbers.

  17. #7177
    Win or lose, it begins with...
    Arsenal's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts

    2,184

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by HSCK View Post
    Just curious, have you compared its total results vs. 8+ round tournaments, I think its lack of success in that aspect is what drives the narrative that it was "dead." Also, posted my February numbers.
    I did not. I thought that we had agreed that we'd be using all 33+ player tourneys and only Top 8's. That was the criteria that I used for all analysis for Jan-Oct 2013.
    Discussing the impact of True-Name Nemesis on Legacy:

    Quote Originally Posted by 2Rach View Post
    And format warping itself isn't necessarily a bad thing for that matter.

  18. #7178
    Joe Cool Above All
    HSCK's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Posts

    664

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Arsenal View Post
    I did not. I thought that we had agreed that we'd be using all 33+ player tourneys and only Top 8's. That was the criteria that I used for all analysis for Jan-Oct 2013.
    Not for discussing tiers, just as a personal curiosity. February was a really slow month for tourneys btw.

  19. #7179
    Member
    Dzra's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2010
    Location

    Plano, Texas
    Posts

    911

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    Do you mean it's typical of modern Legacy or Legacy traditionally? I'll agree it's typical of what gets passed off as diversity these days.
    Regardless of new cards and interactions, the Legacy community base has grown quite a bit since the format was first created. Due to the strong online presence of magic these days and an increase in tournament coverage, the archtypes are more distinct. Which is to say that generally certain builds are proven and shown to perform better, thus pushing out fringe builds and non-archtypes. If I say RUG Delver, you know about 56 out of 60 of the cards that I'm talking about. If I said WUG Threshold in 2005, you only know maybe 40 of the 60. Decks today are better and tighter than they were back in the day, and this means bad news for brews (especially weak ones).

    To say that Legacy is not diverse today compared to ye ole days is not exactly fair since it is no longer as reasonable to show up with a brew and just take down a tournament in such a developed format. More players, more tournaments, more tournament coverage, and more online discussion all come together to create a less "wild west" and a more definite meta. Traditional Legacy verses Modern Legacy is nothing more than the format growing up and developing.

    For reference: GP Philadelphia '05

  20. #7180
    Site Contributor
    Esper3k's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Location

    Houston, TX
    Posts

    2,057

    Re: All B/R update speculation.

    On top of that, we now have weekly large tournaments (the SCG Open series) that the community is watching. That in itself is rapidly evolving the meta (or at least skewing it) towards what is most popular on the SCG circuit.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)